Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Routes to Conceptual Change in Teaching and Learning About Evolution

Experiences with Students Aged Between 11 and 16 Years

  • Chapter
Darwin-Inspired Learning

Part of the book series: New Directions in Mathematics and Science Education ((NDMS))

Abstract

I regard my own experience of Darwin-inspired learning as the continuation of a highly personal journey. My academic and professional life is rooted in the laboratory, but since joining the Charles Darwin Trust as an educator in 2008, I have become aware that I am still on this childhood journey of discovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ayala, F, J. (2009). Darwin and the scientific method. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(suppl.), 10033–10039.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC. (2006). Britons unconvinced on evolution. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4648598.stm

  • Borun, M, Massey, C., & Lutter, T. (1993). Naïve knowledge and the design of Science Museum exhibits, Curator, 36(3), 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braund, M., & Reiss, M. J. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: the contribution of outof-school learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1373–1388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunby, M. (1984). Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students. Science Education, 68(4), 493–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, J. Retrieved from http://www.csun.edu/~jcc62330/coursework/690/Assignments/castro_misconception.pdf

  • Cerini, B., Murray, I., & Reiss M. J. (2003). Student review of the science curriculum: Major findings. London: Planet Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles Darwin Trust. (2012). Retrieved from http://charlesdarwintrust.org/content/19/darwin-inspiredlearning

  • Cleaves, A., & Toplis, R. (2007). In the shadow of intelligent design: The teaching of evolution. Journal of Biological Education, 42(1), 30–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, E., & Wood-Robinson, C. (1985). How secondary students interpret instances of biological adaptation. Journal of Biological Education, 19(2), 125–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, C., Goodman, N. D., & Sculz, L. E. (2011). Where science starts: Spontaneous experiments in preschoolers’ exploratory play. Cognition, 120, 341–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, A., & Moore, J. (1991). Darwin. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, M. J. (2009). Closing the gap: Inverting the genetics curriculum to ensure an informed public. American Journal of Human Genetics, 85, 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghein, A. (1985). Children’s ideas in science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. E. (2006). Teaching and learning about evolution. In M. E. Evans & J. Diamond (Ed.). Virus and the whale: Exploring evolution in creatures small and large. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre, D., & Marjoram, T. (1990). Enriching and extending the national curriculum. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, M., & Chi, M. T. H. (1998). The nature of naive explanations of natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1231–1256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helm, H., & Novak, J. D. (1983). Misconceptions in science and mathematics. Proceedings of the First International Seminar on Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ideker, T., Galitski, T. & Hood, L. (2001). A new approach to decoding life: Systems biology. Annual Review of Genomics: Human Genetics, 2, 343–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. (2008). Darwin’s Island: The Galapagos in the garden of England. London: Hachette Digital.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, R. (2001). Darwin, his daughter and human evolution. New York, NY: The Berkley Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, R. (2009). Darwin’s ways of working: The opportunity for education. Journal of Biological Education, 43(3), 101–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J., Leach, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000). All in the genes? Young people’s understanding of the nature of genes. Journal of Biological Education, 34(2), 74–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis J., & Kattman, U. (2004). Traits, genes, particles and information: re-visiting students’ understanding of genetics. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills Shaw, K. R., Van Horne, K., Zhuang, H., & Broughman, J. (2008). Essay contest reveals misconceptions of high school students in genetics content. Genetics, 178(3), 1157–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nundy, S. (2001). Raising achievement through the environment: A case for fieldwork and field centres. Peterborough, UK: National Association of Field Studies Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, P. A. (2007). The evolution of textbook misconceptions about Darwin. Journal of Biological Education, 41(2), 53–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J. (2008). Teaching evolution in a creationist environment: an approach based on worldviews not misconceptions. School Science Review, 90(331), 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samarapungavan, A. (2011). Ontological assumptions about species and their influence on students’ understanding of evolutionary biology. In R.S. Taylor & M. Ferrari (Eds.), Epistemology and science education: Understanding the evolution vs. intelligent design controversy. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1994). About curiosity and being inquisitive. Annual Review of Physiology, 56, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, A., & Hurst, J. A. (2008). What is this Genetics, Anyway? Understandings of genetics, illness causality and inheritance among British Pakistani users of genetic services. Journal of Genetic Counselling, 17, 373–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G. M., Brem, S. K., & Evans, M. (2008). Changing Minds? Implications of conceptual change for teaching and learning about biological evolution. Evolution Education Outreach, 1, 189–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venville, G., Gribble, S. J., & Donovan, J. (2004). An exploration of young children’s understandings of genetics concepts from Ontological and Epistemological perspectives. Science Education, 89(4), 614–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. D. (2009). Belief versus acceptance: Why do people not believe in evolution? Bioessays, 31(11), 1255–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Charles Darwin Trust, UK

    Emma Newall

Authors
  1. Emma Newall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Education, University of London, UK

    Carolyn J. Boulter

  2. Institute of Education, University of London, UK

    Michael J. Reiss

  3. Department of Pedagogical, Curricular and Professional Studies, University of Gothenburg, Sweden

    Dawn L. Sanders

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Newall, E. (2015). Routes to Conceptual Change in Teaching and Learning About Evolution. In: Boulter, C.J., Reiss, M.J., Sanders, D.L. (eds) Darwin-Inspired Learning. New Directions in Mathematics and Science Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-833-6_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation