Skip to main content

Dialogical Participatory Action Research in Social Work Using Delta-Reflecting Teams

  • Chapter

Abstract

Action research cannot work from a position where the main flow of impulses moves from general theory to local action (Gustavsen, 2008). In action research we must move away from theory-based approaches to ones more rooted in people’s practice (Shotter, 2005a). Action research (AR) is a form of practitioner research dealing with tasks and changing processes in the world – in everyday practice (Denscombe, 2009) – in the everyday conduct of our lives (Reason & Bradbury, 2006).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andersen, T. (1987). The reflecting team: Dialogue and meta-dialogue in clinical work. Family process, 26, 415–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T. (1992). Relationship, language and pre-understanding in the reflecting processes. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 13(2), 87–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T. (2003). Reflekterande processer. Samtal och samtal om samtalen. Stockholm: Mareld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, H. (1990). Then and now: A journey from “knowing” to “not knowing”. Contemporary Family Therapy, 12(3), 193–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1987). Ande och Natur. En nödvändig enhet (C. G. Liungman, Trans.). Stockholm/Lund: Symposion Bokförlag & Tryckeri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (2007). Kunskapssociologi. Hur individen uppfattar och formar sin sociala verklighet (S. Olsson, Trans.). Stockholm: Wahlströms & Widstrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, J. (1992). Approach, method, technique: Making distinctions and creating connections. Human Systems: The Journal of Systemic Consultation & Management, 3, 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchin, G. (1987). Hypothesizing, circularity, and neutrality revisited: An invitation to curiosity. Family process, 26(4), 405–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. (2003). Appreciative inquiry. In M. Gergen & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Social construction: A reader (pp. 173–181). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. (2005). Appreciative inquiry: A positive revolution in change. San Francisco, CA: Berett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooperrider, D. L., Whitney, D., & Stavros, J. M. (2005). Appreciative inquiry handbook. The first in a series of AI workbooks for leaders of change. San Francisco, CA: Crown Custom Publishing, Berett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denscombe, M. (2009). Forskningshandboken – för småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom samhällsvetenskaperna (P. Larson, Trans.). Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1991). How we think. New York, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (2007). Democracy and education. Teddington, Middlesex: Echo Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (2001). Social construction in context. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. (Eds.). (2003). Social construction: A reader. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (1998). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsen, B. (2008). Action research, practical challenges and the formation of theory. Action Research, 6, 421–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. (1991). Organisations: Conundrums, chaos and communication. In M. Marshall, M. Preston-Shoot, & E. Wincott (Eds.), Effective management. Birmingham: British Association of Social Workers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. (1997). Patterns, connections and change. London: Kensington Consultation Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P., & McAdam, E. (1994). Stories, giving account and systemic descriptions: Perspectives and positions in conversations. Feeding and fanning the winds of creative imagination. Human Systems, 6(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, E. (1995). Hearing the voices of the child: Tuning into the voices of influence: The social construction of therapy with children. Human Systems, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNiff, J., Lomax, P., & Whitehead, J. (1996). You and your action research project. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brian, C., & Bruggen, P. (1985). Our personal and professional lives: Learning positive connotation and circular questioning. Family Process, 24(31), 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, A. M. (2005). Barnets socialsekreterare. Coaching i dialogiska utredningar (Vol. 4). Malmö: Länsstyrelsen i Skåne län.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, A. M. (2006). Coach i socialt arbete och dialogcoaching. Om reflektion och dialog som gör skillnad (Vol. 1). Malmö: Länsstyrelsen i Skåne län.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, A. M. (2007a). Barns berättelser om socialtjänstens utredningar. Samtal mellan socialsekreterare och barn (Vol. 1). Malmö: Länsstyrelsen i Skåne län.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, A. M. (2007b). Klienternas socialsekreterare inom missbrukarvården (Vol. 9). Malmö: Länsstyrelsen i Skåne län.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, A. M. (2008a). Annorlunda kommunikation på socialkontoret. Om förändring och utveckling i språk-systemisk praktik (Vol. 2). Malmö: Länsstyrelsen i Skåne län.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, A. M. (2008b). Hörs barnet? Studie om hur socialsekreterare gör barns röst hörda i utredningarna (Vol. 3). Malmö: Länsstyrelsen i Skåne län.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, A. M. E. (2010). Listening to the Voice of Children. Systemic Dialogue Coaching: Inviting Participation and Partnership in Social Work (Professional Doctorate in Systemic Practice PhD). University of Bedfordshire, Luton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, W. B. (1994). Interpersonal communication: Making social worlds. New York, NY: Harper Collins College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn, P. (1982). Circular Questioning. Family process, 21, 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penn, P. (1985). Feed forward: Future questions, future maps. Family Process, 24, 299–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2006). Introduction: Inquiry and participation in search of world worthy of human aspiration. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 1–14). London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practioner. toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (2002). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Aldershot: Ashgate Arena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (1980). Men the magicians: The duality of social being and the structure of moral worlds. In A. J. Chapman & D. M. Jones (Eds.), Models of man (pp. 25–28). Leicester: British Psychological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (1984). Social accountability and selfhood. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (1987). The social construction of an “us”: Problems of accountability and narratology. In R. Burnett, P. McGhee, & D. Clarke (Eds.), Accounting for personal relationships: Social representations of interpersonal links (pp. 225–247). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (2002). Spontaneous responsiveness, chiasmic relations, and consciousness inside the realm of living expression. Retrieved July 04, 2014 from http://pubpages.unh.edu/~jds/Consciousness.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (2003, October). Inside the moment of speaking: In our meetings with others, we cannot simply be ourselves. Paper presented at the Psychologies and Identities Conference, University of Bergamo, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (2004, December). The embodied practitioner: Toward dialogic-descriptive accounts of social practices. Paper presented at The Role of the Social Sciences Today. Cardiff university, Wales. Retrieved July 04, 2014 from http://pubpages.unh.edu/~jds/Cardiff.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (2005a). Inside organizations: Action research, management and ‘withness’-thinking. London: KCC Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (2005b). The short book of ‘Withness’-thinking. London: KCCF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (2006). Understanding process from within: An argument for ‘withness’-thinking. Organization Studies, 27(4), 585–604. doi: 10.1177/0170840606062105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (2011). Spontaneous responsiveness, chiasmic relations, and consciousness: Inside the realm of living expression. Retrieved July 04, 2014 from http://www.johnshotter.com/2011/08/19/draftpaper-on-consciousness/

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., & Nylund, D. (Eds.). (1997). Narrative therapies with children and adolescents. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomm, K. (2000). Systemisk intervjumetodik. En utveckling av det terapeutiska samtalet. Stockholm: Mareld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F., Greenwood, D. J., & Lazes, P. (1991). Participatory action research. through practice to science in social research. In W. F. Whyte (Ed.), Participatory action research. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Olsson, Am.E. (2014). Dialogical Participatory Action Research in Social Work Using Delta-Reflecting Teams. In: Rauch, F., Schuster, A., Stern, T., Pribila, M., Townsend, A. (eds) Promoting Change through Action Research. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-803-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics