Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

The Ubiquity of the Chaos-Order Continuum

Insights from Diverse Academic Disciplines

  • Chapter
A Critique of Creativity and Complexity

Part of the book series: Advances in Creativity and Giftedness ((ACAG,volume 25))

Abstract

When considering the extent to which complexity theory applies to diverse phenomena it is interesting to consider the structure and dynamics of various academic disciplines. Epistemological frameworks and problem-solving heuristics can differ markedly when one passes through the border separating one discipline from another. Questions arise about the ways in which complex adaptive systems structure themselves and operate when viewed through differing disciplinary lenses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ambrose, D. (1995a). Creatively intelligent post-industrial organizations and intellectually impaired bureaucracies. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, D. (1995b). Seeking chaotic order: Classrooms as complex adaptive systems. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, D. (2003). Theoretic scope, dynamic tensions, and dialectical processes: A model for discovery of creative intelligence. In D. Ambrose, L. M. Cohen & A. J. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Creative intelligence: Toward theoretic integration, (pp. 325–345). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, D. (2005). Aspiration growth, talent development, and self-fulfillment in a context of democratic erosion. Roeper Review, 28, 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, D. (2006). Large-scale contextual influences on creativity: Evolving academic disciplines and global value systems. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, D. (2009). Expanding visions of creative intelligence: An interdisciplinary exploration. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, D. (2012). The not-so-invisible hand of economics and its impact on conceptions and manifestations of high ability. In D. Ambrose, R. J. Sternberg & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Confronting dogmatism in gifted education (pp. 97–114). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, D., & Cross, T. L. (Eds.). (2009). Morality, ethics, and gifted minds. New York, NY: Springer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, D., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (2012). How dogmatic beliefs harm creativity and higher-level thinking. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, D., Sternberg, R. J., & Sriraman, B. (Eds.). (2012). Confronting dogmatism in gifted education. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, D., VanTassel-Baska, J., Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (2010). Unified, insular, firmly policed or fractured, porous, contested, gifted education? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33, 453–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anteneodo, C., & da Luz, M. G. E. (2010). Complex dynamics of life at different scales: From genomic to global environmental issues. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society [special issue], 368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1997). The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleakley, A. (2010). Blunting Occam’s razor: Aligning medical education with studies of complexity. Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16 (4), 849–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belsey, A. (1998). Journalism and ethics: Can they co-exist? In M. Kieran (Ed.), Media ethics (pp. 1–14). London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, T., & Schorske, C. E. (Eds.). (1997). American academic culture in transformation: Fifty years, four disciplines. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. C. (2012). Narrowing curriculum, assessments, and conceptions of what it means to be smart in the US schools: Creaticide by design. In D. Ambrose & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), How dogmatic beliefs harm creativity and higher-level thinking (pp. 79–93). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermeo, N. (2003). Ordinary people in extraordinary times. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boal, K. B., & Schultz, P. L. (2007). Storytelling, time, and evolution: The role of strategic leadership in complex adaptive systems. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 411–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boedecker, J., Obst, O., Lizier, J. T., Mayer, N. M., & Asada, M. (2012). Information processing in echo state networks at the edge of chaos. Theory in Biosciences, 131, 205–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers, W. (2007). How mathematicians think: Using ambiguity, contradiction, and paradox to create mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, W. (2011). The blind spot: Science and the crisis of uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P. (2010). Economic complexity and equilibrium illusion: Essays on market instability and macro vitality. London, England: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corning, P. A. (2005). Holistic Darwinism: Synergy, cybernetics, and the bioeconomics of evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, G. A., Pines, D., & Meltzer, D. (Eds.). (1999). Complexity: Metaphors, models, and reality. Reading, MA: Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, D. Y., & Renzulli, J. S. (2008). Snowflakes, living systems, and the mystery of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 114–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (2004). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. New York, NY: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doll, W. E. (2012). Complexity and the culture of curriculum. Complicity, 9, 10–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, L., & Paul, R. (2012). Dogmatism, creativity, and critical thought: The reality of human minds and the possibility of critical societies. In D. Ambrose & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), How dogmatic beliefs harm creativity and higher-level thinking (pp. 37–49). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ensalaco, M. (2005). Pinochet: A study in impunity. In S. Nagy-Zekmi & F. Leiva (Eds.), Democracy in Chile: The legacy of September 11, 1973 (pp. 116–129). Brighton, England: Sussex Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontdevila, J., Opazo, M. P., & White, H. C. (2011). Order at the edge of chaos: Meanings from netdom switchings across functional systems. Sociological Theory, 29, 178–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1975). An economist’s protest: Columns in political economy (2nd ed.). Glen Ridge, NJ: Thomas Horton and Daughters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershenson, C. (2012). Guiding the self-organization of random Boolean networks. Theory in Biosciences, 131, 181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyer, R. (Ed.). (2007). complexity, science and society. Abingdon, England: Radcliffe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guastello, S. J. (1995). Chaos, catastrophe, and human affairs: Applications of nonlinear dynamics to work, organizations, and social evolution. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A. (2003). Identity in democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, J. S., & Pierson, P. (2005). Off center: The Republican revolution and the erosion of American democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, J. S., & Pierson, P. (2010). Winner-take-all politics: How Washington made the rich richer–and turned its back on the middle class. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harjunen, E. (2011). Patterns of control over the teaching–studying–learning process and classrooms as complex dynamic environments: A theoretical framework. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 139–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1944). The road to serfdom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H. (2006). Studying complex adaptive systems. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 19, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R. (1997). System effects: Complexity in political and social life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. A. (2002). Investigations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (2008). The return of depression economics and the crisis of 2008. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, D. (2006). Reviving the invisible hand: The case for classical liberalism in the twenty-first century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, C. G. (1990). Communication at the edge of chaos: Phase transitions and emergent computation. Physica D, 42, 12–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lizier, J. T. (2012). The local information dynamics of distributed computation in complex systems. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madrick, J. (2011). Age of greed: The triumph of finance and the decline of America, 1970 to the present. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty, M. E., & Appleby, R. S. (1994). An interim report on a hypothetical family. In M. E. Marty & R. S. Appleby (Eds.), Fundamentalism observed (Vol. 1, pp. 814–842). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1968). Marx and Engels: Selected works. London, England: Central Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, M. (1982). Education in the Soviet Union: Policies and institutions since Stalin. London, England: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzocchi, F. (2012). Complexity and the reductionism-holism debate in systems biology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine, 4, 413–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, A. R. (2001). Self-deception unmasked. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. H., & Page, S. E. (2007). Complex adaptive systems: An introduction to computational models of social life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M., Crutchfield, J. P., & Hraber, P. T. (1994). Dynamics, computation, and the “edge of chaos”; A re-examination. In G. Gowan, D. Pines & D. Melzner (Eds.), Complexity: Metaphors, models, and reality (Vol. 19, pp. 497–513). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B. (2000). Moral purity and persecution in history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morowitz, H. J. (2004). The emergence of everything: How the world became complex. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolescu, B. (1996). Levels of complexity and levels of reality: Nature as trans-nature. In B. Pullman (Ed.), The emergence of complexity in mathematics, physics, chemistry, and biology (pp. 393–417). Vatican City: Pontifical Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, R. N., & Hunt, J. G. (2007). Leadership and the choice of order: Complexity and hierarchical perspectives near the edge of chaos. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packard, N. H. (1988). Adaptation toward the edge of chaos. In J. A. S. Kelso, A. J. Mandell & M. F. Shlesinger (Eds.), Dynamic patterns in complex systems (pp. 293–301). Singapore: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, S. E. (2007). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T., & Derry, R. (2012). Sustainability and business in a complex world. Business and Society Review, 117, 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. New York, NY: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullman, B. (Ed.). (1996). The emergence of complexity in mathematics, physics, chemistry, and biology. Vatican City: Pontifical Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, J. (2010). Zombie economics: How dead ideas still walk among us. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramalingam, B. (2013). Data on the edge of chaos: Rethinking international cooperation in a complex world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea, D. (2003). Optimal motivation for creative intelligence. In D. Ambrose, L. M. Cohen & A. J. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Creative intelligence: Toward theoretic integration (pp. 211–235). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. (2001). Millenium as opportunity: Chaos, creativity, and Guilford’s structure of intellect model. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. (2010). Everyday creativity: Process and way of life--four key issues. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 189–215). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, A. (2012). Playing along the porous edge of chaos and discipline: Pathways to the creative analytic process. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 32, 225–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M., & Somers, M. (2006). Organizations as complex adaptive systems: Implications of complexity theory for leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 351–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2012). One creator’s meat is another creator’s poison: Field and domain restrictions on individual creativity. In D. Ambrose & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.). How dogmatic beliefs harm creativity and higher level thinking (pp. 125–134). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1937). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. New York, NY: Modern Library. (Original work published 1776)

    Google Scholar 

  • Solé, R. V. (2011). Phase transitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivey, M. (2008). The continuity of mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R. (2003a). For the glory of God: How monotheism led to reformations, science, witch-hunts, and the end of slavery. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R. (2003b). One true God. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, A. (1992). Human creativity as a function of chaotic dynamics: Implications for research and practice in education. (Doctoral dissertation), University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1999). A dialectical basis for understanding the study of cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of cognition (pp. 51–78). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2001). What is the common thread of creativity? Its dialectical relation to intelligence and wisdom. American Psychologist, 56, 360–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strogatz, S. H. (2003). Sync: How order emerges from chaos in the universe, nature, and daily life. New York, NY: Hyperion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2010). Free fall: America, free markets, and the sinking of the world economy. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (2012). The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York, NY: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (2001). International society: What is the best that we can do? In J. W. Scott & D. Keates (Eds.), Schools of thought: Twenty-five years of interpretive social science (pp. 388–401). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. J. (1999). Small worlds: The dynamics of networks between order and randomness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, T. G. (2009). In the minds eye: Creative visual thinkers, gifted dyslexics, and the rise of visual technologies. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. G., & Picket, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London, England: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolin, S. (2008). Democracy incorporated: Managed democracy and the specter of inverted totalitarianism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, C. E. (1989). Art and elegance in the synthesis of organic compounds: Robert Burns Woodward. In D. B. Wallace & H. E. Gruber (Eds.), Creative people at work (pp. 227–253). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Don Ambrose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Rider University, USA

    Don Ambrose

  2. The University of Montana, USA

    Bharath Sriraman

  3. Rider University, USA

    Kathleen M. Pierce

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ambrose, D. (2014). The Ubiquity of the Chaos-Order Continuum. In: Ambrose, D., Sriraman, B., Pierce, K.M. (eds) A Critique of Creativity and Complexity. Advances in Creativity and Giftedness, vol 25. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-773-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation