Skip to main content

Science Teacher Self-Efficacy Beliefs, Change Processes, and Professional Development

  • Chapter
The Role of Science Teachers’ Beliefs in International Classrooms

Abstract

This chapter conceptually integrates three frameworks: teacher self-efficacy beliefs, teacher change processes, and teacher professional development as a means of improving teaching and learning in science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all\ Americans. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, A. M., Dragsted, S., Evans, R. H., & Sorensen, H. (2004). The relationship between changes in teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and science teaching environment of Danish first-year elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15, 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballone-Hartzell, L., & Czerniak, C. M. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs about accommodating students’ learning styles in science classes. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 6(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H. (2004). Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, B., Lamprianou, I., & Boyle, T. (2005). A longitudinal study of teacher change: What makes professional development effective? Report of the second year of the study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray-Clark, N., & Bates, R. (2003). Self-Efficacy beliefs and teacher effectiveness: Implications for professional development. Professional Educator, 26(1), 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownell, M. T., & Pajares, F. (1999). Teacher efficacy and perceived success in mainstreaming students with learning and behavior problems. Teacher Education and Special Education, 22, 154–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chester, M. D., & Beaudin, B. Q. (1996). Efficacy beliefs of newly hired teachers in urban schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 233–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christou, C., Eliophotou-Menon, M., & Philippou, G. (2004). Teachers’ concerns regarding the adoption of a new mathematics curriculum: An application of CBAM. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57, 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76, 607–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driksen, D. J., & Tharp, M. D. (1997). Utilizing the concern-based adaption model to facilitate systemic change. Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 1064–1067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellett, C. D., Demir, A., Martin-Hansen, L., Awong-Taylor, J., & Vandergrift, N. (2012, April). Self-efficacy, organizational culture, and change process correlates of faculty engagement in a new policy-based initiative to improve teaching and learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, BC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. H. (2011, September). Active strategies during inquiry-based science teacher education to improve long-term teacher self-efficacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the European Science Education Research Association. Lyon, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitchett, P. G., Starker, T. V., & Salyers, B. (2012). Examining culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy in a preservice social studies education course. Urban Education, 47, 585–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1992). Successful school improvement. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. Falmer, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gado, I., Ferguson, R., & van ’t Hooft (2006). Inquiry-based instruction through handheld-based science activities: Preservice teachers’ attitude and self-efficacy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 501–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greensfeld, H., & Elkad-Lehman, I. (2007). An analysis of the processes of change in two science teachers educators’ thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1219–1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, M. (1983). Recipes for busy teachers. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 4, 478–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, M. (1995). Professional careers and professional development: Some intersections. In Guskey, T., & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 193–224). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, R. K., & Hall, G. (1981). A study of the concerns of science teachers regarding an implementation of ISCS. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18, 479–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khourey-Bowers, C., & Simonis, D. G. (2004). Longitudinal study of middle grades chemistry professional development: Enhancement of personal science teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15, 175–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshmanan, A., Heath, B. P., Perlmutter, A., & Elder, M. (2011). The impact of science content and professional learning communities on science teaching efficacy and standards-based instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 534–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsely, S., Love, N., Stiles, K., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teacher of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumpe, A. T., Haney, J. J., & Czerniak, C.M. (2000). Assessing teachers’ beliefs about their science teaching context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 275–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, M. (1984). Concerns based adoption model (CBAM): Basis for an elementary science methods course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 755–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. J., McCaughtry, N., McCaughtry, P., & Cothran, D. (2008). The influences of professional development on teachers’ self-efficacy toward educational change. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 13, 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, M., Sexton, T., & Meyerson, M. J. (1999). Validating the efficacy-based change model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 471–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L. V. (2004). Self-efficacy in academe: Connecting the belief and the reality. Innovative Higher Education, 28(3), 159–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National committee for science education standards and assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (1997). Current directions in self-efficacy research. In M. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advance in motivation and achievement, (Vol. 10, pp. 1–49). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posnanski, T. J. (2002). Professional development programs for elementary science teachers: An analysis of teacher self-efficacy beliefs and a professional development model. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 189–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell-Moman, A. D., & Brown-Schild, V. B. (2011). The influence of a two-year professional development institute on teacher self-efficacy and use of inquiry-based instruction. Science Educator, 20, 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, V. (1990). Significant and worthwhile change in teaching practice. Educational Researcher, 13(7), 10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 905–947). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. K., Henson, R. K., Tharp, B. Z., & Moreno, N. P. (2001). An examination of change in teacher self-efficacy beliefs in science education based on the duration of inservice activities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12, 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J., & Bruce, C. (2007). Professional development effects on teacher efficacy: Results of randomized field trial. Journal of Educational Research, 101(1), 50–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senger, S. E. (1999). Reflective reform in mathematics: The recursive nature of teacher change. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37, 199–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, B. B., Naizer, G., & Ledbetter, C. (2011). Observed implementation of a science professional development program for K-8 classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 579–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smolleck, L. A., & Mongan, A. M. (2011). Changes in preservice teachers’ self-efficacy: From science methods to student teaching. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 1(1), 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., Hofer, J., Gillespie, M., Solomon, M., & Rowe, K. (2003). How teachers change: A study of professional development in adult education. NCSALL reports #25. Boston, MA: National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., & Gillespie, M. (2007). Research on professional development and teacher change: Implications for adult basic education. In Comings, J., Garner, B., & Smith, C. (Eds.), Review of adult learning and literacy: Connecting research, policy, and practice (pp. 205–244). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Burke-Spero, R. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A Comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 343–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Demir, K., Ellett, C.D. (2014). Science Teacher Self-Efficacy Beliefs, Change Processes, and Professional Development. In: Evans, R., Luft, J., Czerniak, C., Pea, C. (eds) The Role of Science Teachers’ Beliefs in International Classrooms. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-557-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics