Abstract
This chapter conceptually integrates three frameworks: teacher self-efficacy beliefs, teacher change processes, and teacher professional development as a means of improving teaching and learning in science.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all\ Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Andersen, A. M., Dragsted, S., Evans, R. H., & Sorensen, H. (2004). The relationship between changes in teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and science teaching environment of Danish first-year elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15, 25–38.
Ballone-Hartzell, L., & Czerniak, C. M. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs about accommodating students’ learning styles in science classes. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 6(2).
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
Borko, H. (2004). Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.
Boyle, B., Lamprianou, I., & Boyle, T. (2005). A longitudinal study of teacher change: What makes professional development effective? Report of the second year of the study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(1), 1–27.
Bray-Clark, N., & Bates, R. (2003). Self-Efficacy beliefs and teacher effectiveness: Implications for professional development. Professional Educator, 26(1), 13–22.
Brownell, M. T., & Pajares, F. (1999). Teacher efficacy and perceived success in mainstreaming students with learning and behavior problems. Teacher Education and Special Education, 22, 154–164.
Chester, M. D., & Beaudin, B. Q. (1996). Efficacy beliefs of newly hired teachers in urban schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 233–257.
Christou, C., Eliophotou-Menon, M., & Philippou, G. (2004). Teachers’ concerns regarding the adoption of a new mathematics curriculum: An application of CBAM. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57, 157–176.
Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947–967.
Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76, 607–652.
Driksen, D. J., & Tharp, M. D. (1997). Utilizing the concern-based adaption model to facilitate systemic change. Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 1064–1067.
Ellett, C. D., Demir, A., Martin-Hansen, L., Awong-Taylor, J., & Vandergrift, N. (2012, April). Self-efficacy, organizational culture, and change process correlates of faculty engagement in a new policy-based initiative to improve teaching and learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, BC.
Evans, R. H. (2011, September). Active strategies during inquiry-based science teacher education to improve long-term teacher self-efficacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the European Science Education Research Association. Lyon, France.
Fitchett, P. G., Starker, T. V., & Salyers, B. (2012). Examining culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy in a preservice social studies education course. Urban Education, 47, 585–611.
Fullan, M. (1992). Successful school improvement. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. Falmer, London.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Gado, I., Ferguson, R., & van ’t Hooft (2006). Inquiry-based instruction through handheld-based science activities: Preservice teachers’ attitude and self-efficacy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 501–529.
Greensfeld, H., & Elkad-Lehman, I. (2007). An analysis of the processes of change in two science teachers educators’ thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1219–1245.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 381–391.
Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Huberman, M. (1983). Recipes for busy teachers. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 4, 478–510.
Huberman, M. (1995). Professional careers and professional development: Some intersections. In Guskey, T., & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 193–224). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
James, R. K., & Hall, G. (1981). A study of the concerns of science teachers regarding an implementation of ISCS. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18, 479–487.
Khourey-Bowers, C., & Simonis, D. G. (2004). Longitudinal study of middle grades chemistry professional development: Enhancement of personal science teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15, 175–195.
Lakshmanan, A., Heath, B. P., Perlmutter, A., & Elder, M. (2011). The impact of science content and professional learning communities on science teaching efficacy and standards-based instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 534–551.
Loucks-Horsely, S., Love, N., Stiles, K., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teacher of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
Lumpe, A. T., Haney, J. J., & Czerniak, C.M. (2000). Assessing teachers’ beliefs about their science teaching context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 275–292.
Malone, M. (1984). Concerns based adoption model (CBAM): Basis for an elementary science methods course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 755–768.
Martin, J. J., McCaughtry, N., McCaughtry, P., & Cothran, D. (2008). The influences of professional development on teachers’ self-efficacy toward educational change. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 13, 171–190.
McKinney, M., Sexton, T., & Meyerson, M. J. (1999). Validating the efficacy-based change model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 471–485.
Morris, L. V. (2004). Self-efficacy in academe: Connecting the belief and the reality. Innovative Higher Education, 28(3), 159–162.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National committee for science education standards and assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Pajares, F. (1997). Current directions in self-efficacy research. In M. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advance in motivation and achievement, (Vol. 10, pp. 1–49). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Posnanski, T. J. (2002). Professional development programs for elementary science teachers: An analysis of teacher self-efficacy beliefs and a professional development model. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 189–220.
Powell-Moman, A. D., & Brown-Schild, V. B. (2011). The influence of a two-year professional development institute on teacher self-efficacy and use of inquiry-based instruction. Science Educator, 20, 47–53.
Richardson, V. (1990). Significant and worthwhile change in teaching practice. Educational Researcher, 13(7), 10–18.
Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 905–947). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Roberts, J. K., Henson, R. K., Tharp, B. Z., & Moreno, N. P. (2001). An examination of change in teacher self-efficacy beliefs in science education based on the duration of inservice activities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12, 199–213.
Ross, J., & Bruce, C. (2007). Professional development effects on teacher efficacy: Results of randomized field trial. Journal of Educational Research, 101(1), 50–60.
Senger, S. E. (1999). Reflective reform in mathematics: The recursive nature of teacher change. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37, 199–221.
Sinclair, B. B., Naizer, G., & Ledbetter, C. (2011). Observed implementation of a science professional development program for K-8 classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 579–594.
Smolleck, L. A., & Mongan, A. M. (2011). Changes in preservice teachers’ self-efficacy: From science methods to student teaching. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 1(1), 133–145.
Smith, C., Hofer, J., Gillespie, M., Solomon, M., & Rowe, K. (2003). How teachers change: A study of professional development in adult education. NCSALL reports #25. Boston, MA: National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy.
Smith, C., & Gillespie, M. (2007). Research on professional development and teacher change: Implications for adult basic education. In Comings, J., Garner, B., & Smith, C. (Eds.), Review of adult learning and literacy: Connecting research, policy, and practice (pp. 205–244). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Burke-Spero, R. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A Comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 343–356.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Demir, K., Ellett, C.D. (2014). Science Teacher Self-Efficacy Beliefs, Change Processes, and Professional Development. In: Evans, R., Luft, J., Czerniak, C., Pea, C. (eds) The Role of Science Teachers’ Beliefs in International Classrooms. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-557-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-557-1_12
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6209-557-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)