Skip to main content

Equality, Democratic Citizenship and Solidarity

Is There a Role for Higher Education in the Framing of an Alternative Paradigm?

  • Chapter
  • 399 Accesses

Abstract

Academic scrutiny is characterized by what Amartya Sen (2011) called, in his conference in Faculty of Economics of the University of Coimbra, on 14 March 2011, “criticality”, that is, and I quote: “the importance of critically confronting our own values, in addition to scrutinizing the values that others propagate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, Benedict (1991), Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. london: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Noel S.; Kharem, Haroon (eds.) (2009), Education as Freedom. African American Educational Thought and Activism. lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, Hannanh (1979), The Origins of Totalitarism. new York: harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benadusi, Luciano (2001), “Equity and Education. A critical review of sociological research and thought”, in Walo Hutmacher et al. (2001), In Pursuit of Equity in Education. Using International Indicators to Compare Equity Polices. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 25-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, Nicholas (2007), “Higher education and social cohesion: an introduction”, Prospects, 37:287–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, Craig (2006), “University and the Public Good”, Thesis Eleven, 84:7, pp. 7-43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Randall (2004), Interaction Ritual Chains, Princeton studies in cultural sociology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubet, François, Duru-Bellat, Marie and Vérétout, Antoine (2010), Les écoles et leur societé. Emprise du diplôme et cohesion sociale. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, Jean-Pierre (2009), La marque du sacré. Paris: Carnets Nord.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinoza, Oscar (2010), “Solving the equity/equality Conceptual dilemma: A new-Goal oriented Model to Approach Analyses Associated with different Stages of the educational Process” in Joseph Zadja (ed.), Globalization, Education and Social Justice. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 127-143.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Field, Simon; Kuzcera, Malgorzata; Pont, Beatriz (2007), No More Failures. Ten Steps to Equity in Education. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flecha, Ramón (2011), the dialogic sociology of education”, International Studies in Sociology of Education, 21:1, pp. 7-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, Andy, Preston, John and Janmaat, Jan Germen (2006) Education, Equality and Social Cohesion. A comparative analysis. new York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Andy, Janmaat, G. and Han, C. (2009) Regimes of Social Cohesion, published by the Centre for learning and life Chances in Knowledge economies and Societies. Consulted on 17 March 2011: http://www.llakes.org.uk/.

  • Habermas, Jurgen (1994), Técnica e ciência como ideologia. Lisboa: Edições 70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, A. H. (1993), “Trends in Access and and Equity in Higher Education: Britain in International Perspective”, Oxford Review of Education, 19:2, pp.129-140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hechter, Michael (2001), “Solidarity, Sociology of”, in N. J. Smelser and P. B. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier, pp. 14588-14591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuser, Brian (2007), “Academic social cohesion within higher education”, Prospects, 37:293-303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • hooks, bell (1994), Teaching to transgress. Education as the practice of freedom. new York: routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutmacher, Walo et al. (2001), In Pursuit of Equity in Education. Using International Indicators to Compare Equity Polices. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, Chris (2006), “Higher Education Policies in the European Union, the ‘Knowledge Economy’ and Neo-Liberalism”, Social Europe, vol. 2, 2, Autumn 2006, pp. 78-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Todd (2008), The Political Thought of Jacques Rancière. Creating Equality. Edinburg: Edinburgh university Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2006), Measuring the Effects of Education on Health and Civic Engagement. Proceedings of the Copenhagen Symposium. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/23/61/37437718.pdf (consulted on 16 March 2011).

  • Post, David et al. (2004), “World Bank okays public interest in higher education. A review of Higher Education in Developing Countries: Peril and Promise, Task Force on Higher Education and Society (Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 2000)”, Higher Education, 48: 213–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, Eugene (2008), “White, Black, and Gray: Critical Dialogue with the International Risk Governance Council’s Framework for Risk Governance” in Ortwin Renn and Katherine Walker (eds), Global Risk Governance. Concept and Practice Using the IRGC Framework. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 101-111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Room, Graham et al. (2005), The European Challenge. Innovation, Policy Learning and Social Cohesion in the New Knowledge Economy. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, Paulo et al. (2008), Tertiary Education for the Knowledge Society. OECD Thematic Review of Tertiary Education: Synthesis Report. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, Boaventura de Sousa (2010), “The university in the twenty-first century. Towards a democratic and emancipatory university reform”, Eurozine, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya (1992), Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya (2011), “Values and Justice”, paper presented at the Faculty of Economics of the University of Coimbra (FEU C), Portugal, 14 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shu, Bin (2010), “Solidarity Among Strangers: Interaction Rituals and Publics in the 2008 Sichuan Earthquake in China”, Proceedings of the American Sociological Association Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers, Margaret (2005), “Let them Eat Social Capital: Socializing the Market versus Marketizing the Social”, Thesis Eleven, 81: 5-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somers, Margaret (2008), “Let them eat social capital: how marketizing the social turned Solidarity into a bowling team” in Margaret Somers, Genealogies of Citizenship. Markets, Statelessness, and the Right to Have Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press, chapter 6, pp. 213-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theo, Thomas (2005), The Critique of Psychology. From Kant to Postcolonial Theory. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2000), Higher Education in Developing Countries: Peril and Promise, Task Force on Higher Education and Society. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2002), Constructing knowledge societies: New challenges for tertiary education. Directions in Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mendes, J.M. (2014). Equality, Democratic Citizenship and Solidarity. In: Teodoro, A., Guilherme, M. (eds) European and Latin American Higher Education Between Mirrors. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-545-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics