Skip to main content
  • 413 Accesses

Abstract

We have presented an overview of the QR STEM project so STEM professional development leaders and teachers reading this have a sense of the big picture, including our goals, methods, and expected outcomes. We now turn to providing a detailed discussion of leading teachers in developing a performance task within the context of energy and environment using the Understanding by Design assessment framework (Wiggins and McTighe, 2005).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ausubel, J. H. (1996). Can technology spare the earth. American Scientist, 84, 166–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J. (2004). Making sustainable development evaluation work. Sustainable Development, 12, 200–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, S. M., & McMunn, N. D. (2006). A teacher’s guide to classroom assessment: Understanding and using assessment to improve student learning. Indianapolis, IN: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chertow, M. R. (2001). The IPAT equation and its variants: Changing views of technology and environmental impact. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 4, 13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePaolo, D. J., & Orr, F. M. (2008). Geoscience research for our energy future. Physics Today, 61, 46–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P., & Holdren, J. (1971). Impact of population growth. Science, 171, 1212–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. (1997). Minds of our own. Annenberg Learner. http://learner.org/resources/series26.html

  • Hilbert, D. (1901). Problemes mathematiques.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (2001). Grand challenges in environmental sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2005). Creating a disaster resilient America: Grand challenges in science and technology: Summary of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Teachers Association. (1996). Pathways to science education standards. Arlington, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omenn, G. S. (2006). Grand challenges and great opportunities in science, technology, and public policy. Science, 314, 1696–1704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rios-Velazquez, C., Robles-Suarez, R., Gonzalez-Negron, A. J., & Baez-Santos, I. (2006). The delta cooperative model: a dynamic and innovative team-work activity to develop research skills in microbiology. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 7, 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellnhuber, H.J., & Sahagian, D. (2002). The twenty-three GAIM questions. Global Change Newsletter, 49, 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on Mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York, NY: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, M. R. (1983). The role of products as social stimuli: A symbolic interactionism perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 319–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W., Sanderson, A., Tyson, P. D., Jäger, J., Matson, P. A., Moore III, B., … Wasson, RJ. (2004). Global change and the earth system: A planet under pressure. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varmus, H., Klausner, R., Zerhouni, E., Acharya, T., Daar, A. S., & Singer, P. A. (2003). Grand Challenges in Global Health. Science, 302(5644), 398–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Ascd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mayes, R., Myers, J. (2014). Energy and Environment Performance Task. In: Quantitative Reasoning in the Context of Energy and Environment. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-527-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics