Skip to main content

Controversial Science Issues

  • Chapter

Abstract

Concepts, such as evolution, stem cell research, clone research, climate change,and the existence of great lengths of geologic time may conflict with students’ personal, religious, or political views and ideologies causing discomfort, uncertainty, denial, or changing in one’s thinking based on the data or facts presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Cannard, K. (2005). Embracing controversy in the classroom. Science Scope, 28(9), 14-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slesnick, I. (2004). Clones, cats, and chemicals: Thinking scientifically about controversial issues. Alexandria VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McComas, W.F. (2014). Controversial Science Issues. In: McComas, W.F. (eds) The Language of Science Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-497-0_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics