Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Voice as Subject or Object

  • Chapter
Echoes

  • 723 Accesses

Abstract

In research it is imperative that the researcher considers the ethics of experimenting with human participants. Ethical approval considers the process of identifying the risks and benefits as well as the consent requirements for the participant to be involved in the research (Government, 2007). The preamble of the Australian National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (National Statement) considers ethical conduct as more than doing the right thing and involves “acting in the right spirit, out of an abiding respect and concern for one’s fellow creatures” (National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia Research Council & Vice-Chancellor’s Committee, 2007).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Belkin, N. (1990). The Cognitive viewpoint in information science. Journal of Information Science, 16(11).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, H., & School, U. o. W. I. (Eds.). (2002). CoLIS 4: proceedings of the fourth international conference on conceptions of library and information science, seattle, WA, USA, July 21–25, 2002: Libraries Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coloma, R. S. (2011). Who’s afraid of foucault? History, theory, and becoming subjects. History of Education Quarterly, 51(2), 184–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dictionary. (2012). Oxford English dictionary. Retrieved January 26, 2012, from http://oxforddictionaries.com/

  • Dreyfus, H., & Rabinow, P. (Eds.). (1983). Michael foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, 2nd Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia Research Council, & Australian Vice-Chancellor’s Committee. (2007). National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. Canberra: Retrieved from http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/e72_national_statement_130207.pdf.

  • Mandler, J., & Mandler, G. (1974). Good guys versus bad guys: The subject-object dichotomy. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 14(4), 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, M., Gutman, H., & Hutton, P. (Eds.). (1988). A Seminar with Michael Foucault’s Technologies of the Self.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review, 8(4), 357–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGushin, E. F. (2007). Foucault’s Askesis: An introduction to the philosophical life. Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Farrell, C. (2005). Michel Foucault. SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponterotto, J. (2005). Qualitative research in counselling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 52(2), 126–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeter, K. (2006). The Ethics of Empowerment. Journal of Trauma Nursing, 13(4), 157 – 158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talja, S. (1997). Contituting information and user as research objects: A theory of knowledge formation as an alternative to the information man theory. Paper presented at the international conference on information seeking in context. Retrieved from http://dl.acm/org/citation.cfm?id-267194#

  • Talja, S., Tuominen, K., & Savolainen, R. (2005). Isms in information Science: constructivism, collectivism and constructionims. Journal of documentation, 64(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Educational, S. a. C. O. U. (2006). Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. Retrieved from www.unesco.org/shs/ethics

  • Vladiv-Glover, S. (2010). Poststructuralism in Georgia. [Article]. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 15(3), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Australia

    Yvonne Salton

Authors
  1. Yvonne Salton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Southern Queensland, Australia

    Warren Midgley

  2. Sidra Medical and Research Center, Qatar

    Andy Davies

  3. University of Southern Queensland, Australia

    Mark E. Oliver

  4. University of Southern Queensland, Australia

    Patrick Alan Danaher

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salton, Y. (2014). The Voice as Subject or Object. In: Midgley, W., Davies, A., Oliver, M.E., Danaher, P.A. (eds) Echoes. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-491-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation