Abstract
My Doctor of Philosophy study (Midgley, 2011) was about the experiences of Saudi students at an Australian university. The data for this study were drawn from a series of narrative discussion groups (Midgley, 2013) in which I asked Saudi participants to tell me about their experiences as international students at an Australian university. As there were no pre-determined questions for these narrative discussion groups, the Saudi participants were able to select which experiences they wished to discuss in the context of this research project.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Australian Government. (2007). National statement on ethical conduct in human research. Retrieved from http://www.nhmrc.gov.au
Clough, P. (2002). Narratives and fictions in educational research. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Ellis, C. (2007). Telling secrets, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(3), 3–29.
Fine, M. (1992). Disruptive voices: The possibilities of feminist research. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Freire, P. (1986). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
Habermas, J. (1981/1984). Theory of communicative action (T. A. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Hooks, B. (2000). Where we stand: Class matters. New York, NY: Routledge.
Jones, K. (2007). How did I get to Princess Margaret (And how did I get her to the World Wide Web?). Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(3). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs
Keiser, K. (2009). Protecting respondent confidentiality in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19(11), 1632–1641.
Krumer-Nevo, M. (2009). From voice to knowledge: Participatory action research, inclusive debate and feminism. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(3), 279–295.
Liamputtong, P. (2006). Researching the vulnerable: A guide to sensitive research methods. London, UK: Sage.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Lyotard, J-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Medford, K. (2006). Caught with a fake ID: Ethical questions about slippage in autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(5), 853–864.
Midgley, W. (2011). Seeking to understand ‘experiences of difference’ in discussions with Saudi students at an Australian university. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.
Midgley, W. (2013). Participants and research method design: The development of Narrative Discussion Group Method. In W. Midgley, M. Baguley & P. A. Danaher (Eds.), The role of participants in education research: Epistemologies, ethics and methods (pp. 182–192). New York, NY: Routledge.
Midgley, W., Trimmer, K., & Davies, A. (Eds.). (2013). Metaphors for, in and of education research. Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
Yancy, G. (2002). Lyotard and Irigary: Challenging the (white) male philosophical metanarrative voice. Journal of Social Philosophy, 33(4), 563–580.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Midgley, W. (2014). A Faint Echo. In: Midgley, W., Davies, A., Oliver, M.E., Danaher, P.A. (eds) Echoes. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-491-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-491-8_2
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6209-491-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)