Skip to main content

Teachers’ Beliefs Regarding Programming Education

  • Chapter
  • 591 Accesses

Part of the book series: International Technology Education Studies ((ITES,volume 10))

Abstract

Beliefs are like old clothes; once acquired and worn for a while, they become comfortable. It does not make any difference if the clothes are out of style or ragged. Letting go is painful and new clothes require adjustment. And so it may be with epistemological beliefs, especially once they are established in adulthood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baird, J. R., Fensham, P. J., Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (1991). The importance of reflection in improving science teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, A., & Lister, R. (2010). Introductory programming and the didactic triangle. Twelfth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2010), Brisbane, Australasian, 103, 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beswick, K. (2011). Knowledge/beliefs and their relationship to emotion. Current State of Research on Mathematical Beliefs XVI: Proceedings of the MAVI-16 Conference (pp. 43–59). Tallinn, Estonia: Institute of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Tallinn University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boustedt, J., Anna E., Robert M., Jan E. M., Mark R., Kate S., & Carol Z. (2007). Threshold concepts in computer science: do they exist and are they useful? SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(1), 504–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee, J., Boulton-Lewis, G., & Purdie, N. (2002). Core beliefs about knowing and peripheral beliefs about learning: Developing an holistic conceptualisation of epistemological beliefs. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 2, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs, and attitude of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15, 13–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practice. Educational Research, 38, 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K. (2004). Introduction: Paradigmatic approaches to personal epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 39, 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, B., Hermerén, G., & Petersson, B. (2005). Vad är god forskningssed?: synpunkter, riktlinjer och exempel. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, R. P. (1988). Computers, cognition and curriculum: Retrospect and prospect. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kardash, C. M., & Scholes, R. J. (1996). Effects of preexisting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 260–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leder, G. C., & Forgasz, H. J. (2002). Measuring mathematical beliefs and their impact on the learning of mathematics: A new approach. Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (In C. Leder, Gilah, P., Erkki, T. Gunther (eds), (pp. 95–113). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, R., Lee, M., & Jeong, A.(1999). Reflective teaching of logo. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(2), 245–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M. C., & J. Dalbey. (1985). Cognitive consequences of programming instruction: Instruction, access, and ability. Educational Psychologist, 20, 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, Marcia, C., & Michael J. Clancy. (1992). The case for case studies of programming problems. Communications of the ACM, 35(3), 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, R. (2008). After the gold rush: Toward sustainable scholarship in computing. ACE ’08 Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Australasian Computing Education, Australian Computer Society, Inc. Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia, 78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luft, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Capturing science teachers’ epistemological beliefs: The development of the teacher beliefs interview. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11(2), 38–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Male, Sally A., & Baillie, Caroline A. (2011). Engineering threshold concepts. September 27–30. WEE2011, September 27–30, 2011, Lisbon, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Jan., & Land, Ray. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. Technical Report 4, ETL Project Occasional Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, J., & McDougall, A. (1997). Issues in the preparation of teachers of programming for children. In D. Passey & B. Samways (Eds.), Information technology: Supporting change through teacher education (pp. 108–114). London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olafson, L., & Schraw, G. (2006). Teachers’ beliefs and practices within and across domains. International Journal of Educational Research, 45(1–2), 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. K. (1981). Teacher influence in the classroom. Instructional Science, 10, 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teacher’s beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. Harvester Press, Brighton, Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1985). Computer criticism vs Technocentric thinking. Paper presented at Logo 85, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pears, A., Seidman, S., Malmi, L., Mannila, L., Adams, E., BennEds.n, J., et al. (2007). A survey of literature on the teaching of introductory programming. ITiCSE-WGR ’07: Working Group Reports on ITiCSE on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, A., Rountree, J., & Rountree, N. (2003). Learning and teaching programming: A review and discussion. Computer Science Education, 13(2), 137–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolandsson, L. (2010). Teacher pioneers in the introduction of computing technology in Swedish upper secondary school. 3rd IFIP WG9.7 Working Conference on History of Nordic Computing, Stockholm, Sweden. 159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2002). How can we examine the connections between teachers’ world views and their educational practices? Issues in Education, 8(2), 217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoefield, J. W. (1995). Computers and classroom culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1993). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 406–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1994a). An emerging conceptualization of epistemological beliefs and their role in learning. In R. Garner, & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Beliefs about text and instruction with text (pp. 25– 40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1994b). Synthesizing epistemological belief research: tentative understandings and provocative confusions. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 293–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer-Aikins, M. (2004). Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G. J., & Olafson, L. J. (2008). Assessing teachers’ epistemological and ontological worldviews. In K. Myint Swe (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse cultures. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, T. (1973). The practical translation into curriculum. School Review, 81, 501–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (2003). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Aldershot: Arena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheard, J., Simon, S., Hamilton, M., & Lönnberg, J. (2009). Analysis of research into the teaching and learning of programming. ICER 09, Berkley, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolinspektionen. (2010). Undervisning i matematik i gymnasieskolan (Kvalitetsgranskning No. 13). Stockholm: Skolinspektionen. (Diarienummer 40–2009:1837).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trainora, A., & Kate A. B. (2012). Exploring and developing reciprocity in research design. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utbildningsdepartementet. (2011). Uppdrag till Statens skolverk att stärka undervisningen i matematik, naturvetenskap och teknik. U2011/2229/G.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetenskapsrådet (2008). Forskningsetiska principer inom humanistisk-samhällsvetenskaplig forskning Vetenskapsrådet, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M., & Cooney, T. (2003). Mathematics teacher change and development. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education (p. 127). Secaucus, NJ, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yerrick, R., Parke, H., & Nugent, J. (1997). Struggling to promote deeply rooted change: The ‘filtering effect’ of teachers’ beliefs on understanding transformational views of teaching science. Science Education, 81(2), 137–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rolandsson, L. (2013). Teachers’ Beliefs Regarding Programming Education. In: Skogh, IB., Vries, M.J.D. (eds) Technology Teachers as Researchers. International Technology Education Studies, vol 10. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-443-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics