Skip to main content

Transferring Knowledge Versus Knowledge Through Technology Education

What’s the Difference?

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: International Technology Education Studies ((ITES))

Abstract

These lines come from a Victorian comic opera that lampooned university study generally and women’s higher education in particular. A hundred and thirty years later it still points up current distinctions between different types of knowledge and hints at what type of knowledge is more valued. The “Classical” education of the time had little if any technical or scientific tuition, but the author was only mildly satirical realising that “Useful knowledge” was something that the Victorians valued highly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Archer, L.B. (1973). The need for design education. Paper presented to DES conference N850, Horncastle. Mimeo. London: Royal College of Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, F., & Barlex, D. (forthcoming). Linking science, technology, engineering and mathematics in the secondary school: The STEM teachers’ handbook. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M. (2007). Problem-solving in technology education: The role of strategies, schemes & heuristics. In D. Barlex (Ed.), Design and technology for the next generation (pp. 154-169). Whitchurch, UK: Cliffe & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronowski, J. (1973). The ascent of man. London: BBC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. (1982). Technology and knowledge. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 6(2), 3-18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggleston, J. (1992). Teaching design and technology. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. (1984). Education and thinking: The role of knowledge. American Psychologist, 39(2), 93-104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy, S., & McCormick, R. (2002). The general problem-solving process in technology education. Myth or reality. In G. Owen-Jackson (Ed.), Teaching design and technology in secondary schools (pp. 109-123). London: Routledge/Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Layton, D. (1993) Technology’s challenge to science education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawson, B. (2003). Beyond ‘the design process’: An alternative pedagogy for technology education. Intentional Journal of Technology & Design Education, 13(2), 117-128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R. (2006). Technology and knowledge. In J. Dakers (Ed.), Defining technological literacy (pp. 31-47). New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R., & Banks F. (1994). Study guide E650: Design and technology in the secondary curriculum. Milton Keynes, UK: The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. (1991). Gender differences in students’ reactions to practical work. In B. Woolnough (Ed.), Practical science (pp. 131-143). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. (2006). Gender and technology: Gender mediation in school knowledge construction. In J. Dakers (Ed.), Defining technological literacy (pp. 219-237). New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. (2007). Gender & pedagogy. In D. Barlex (Ed.), Design and technology for the next generation (pp. 236-261). Whitchurch, UK: Cliffe & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P., & McCormick, R. (1997). Problem solving in science and technology education. Research in Science Education, 27(3), 461-481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noström, P (2011) Engineers’ non-scientific models in technology education. Intentional Journal of Technology & Design Education (On-Line First). DOI 10.1007/s10798-011-9184-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant, M. (1994). How is science useful to technology? Course Booklet for E886. Milton Keynes, UK: The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E. E. (1973). Small is beautiful. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Banks, F., Plant, M. (2013). Transferring Knowledge Versus Knowledge Through Technology Education. In: Middleton, H.E., Baartman, L.K.J. (eds) Transfer, Transitions and Transformations of Learning. International Technology Education Studies. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-437-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships