Skip to main content

Teacher Evaluation as an Approach to Organizational Learning

A Case Study of Taiwan

  • Chapter
Curriculum Innovations in Changing Societies
  • 1402 Accesses

Abstract

After decades of development, the meanings and content of evaluation continue to evolve. In the context of educational reform, evaluation is used not only for assessing performance, but also for enhancing the competence of teachers and facilitating the improvement of schools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, A., & Foley, P. (2003). Foundations for a learning organization: Organizational learning mechanisms. The Learning Organization, 12(2), 72–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bapuji, H., & Crossan, M. (2004). From questions to answers: Reviewing organizational learning research. Management Learning, 35(4), 397–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkai, I., & Samuel, Y. (2005). The use of organizational learning mechanisms: Environmental, managerial, and cultural correlates. Academy of Management Best Conference Paper, OMT F1-F6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K. (2007). Institutional evaluation and its influence on organizational learning. Asib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 59(1), 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K., & Lin, P. (2008). Organizational learning in the evaluation procedures: A qualitative study. College & Research Libraries, 38, 36–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. (2008). A study on elementary and junior high school teachers’ cognition, concerns and coping strategies for the evaluation on teacher professional development in Taipei County. Unpublished master’s thesis, Tamkang University, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. D., & Yanow, D. (1996). Culture and organizational learning. In M. D. Cohen, & L. S. Sproull (Eds.), Organizational learning (pp. 430–459). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, J. B. (1996). Understanding organizational learning for educational leadership and school reform. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 589–652). London: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, J. B. (1998). Organizational consequences of participatory evaluation: School district case study. In K. Leithwook, & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Organizational learning in schools (pp. 127–148). Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. R., Ellett, C. D., & Annunziata, J. (2002). Teacher evaluation, leadership and learning organizations. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16(4), 287–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, S., & Shpielberg, N. (2003). Organizational learning mechanisms and managers’ perceived uncertainty. Human Relations, 56(10), 1233–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. P. (1996). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. In M. D. Cohen, & L. S. Sproull (Eds.), Organizational learning (pp. 124–162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. A. (2007). Developing evaluation capacity through process use. New Direction for Evaluation, 116, 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, Y. L. J., Chan, C. M. M., Pan, H. L. W., & Wei, H. C. P. (2003). Differential developments of Taiwanese schools in organizational learning: Exploration of critical factors. The International Journal of Educational Management, 17(6), 262–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, M. (2008). Impression management, conflict avoiding, power distance and inauthentic loyalty to supervisor. Unpublished master’s thesis, Chung Cheng University, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipshitz, R., Popper, M., & Oz, S. (1996). Building learning organizations: The design and implementation of organizational learning mechanisms. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32(3), 292–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1998). Leadership and other conditions which foster organizational learning in schools. In K. Leithwook & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Organizational learning in schools (pp. 67–90). Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y. (2007). A study on the evaluation of teachers’ professional development in Taichung City. Unpublished master’s thesis, Chi Nan University, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mai, R. (2004). Leadership for school improvement: Cues from organizational learning and renewal efforts. The Educational Forum, 68(3), 211–221.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • MOE (2010). Implementation main point of Teacher Professional Development Evaluation. Retrieved March 17, 2011, from http://tepd.moe.gov.tw/upfiles/fileupload/88/downf01288243625.pdf

  • Nonaka, I. & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of ‘Ba’: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, H. (2005). Looking forward to the next generation of educational evaluation: The past and the future. In H. L. Pan (Ed.), The retrospect and prospect of educational evaluation (pp. 1–36). Taipei: Sinli. Pan, H. et al. (2010). The program evaluation of a pilotprogram of teacher evaluation for professional development in primary and secondary schools (II). Research Report for Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, M., & Lipshitz, R. (1998). Organizational learning mechanisms: A structural and cultural approach to organizational learning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 34(2), 161–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, M., & Lipshitz, R. (2000). Organizational learning: Mechanisms, culture, and feasibility. Management Learning, 31(2), 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J. R. (2002). Presidential address: On mainstreaming evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 23(3), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schechter, C., & Feldman, N. (2010). Exploring organizational learning mechanism in special education. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(4), 490–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M.(1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M., Roberts, C., Ross, R. B., Smith, B., Roth, G., & Kleiner, A. (1999). The dance of change: The challenges to sustaining momentum in learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency

    Google Scholar 

  • Silins, H. C., Mulford, W. R., & Zarins, S. (2002). Organizational learning and school change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(5), 613–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428–444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (Eds.). (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stronge, J. H., & Tucker, P. D. (1999). The politics of teacher evaluation: A case study of new system design and implementation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13(4), 339–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, W., & Chen, Y. (2006). Constructivism oriented school organizational learning. Education Journal, 34(2), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, B., Shepperson, T., & Canavero, S. (2007). A systems approach to school improvement: Program evaluation and organizational learning. Education, 128(1), 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, R., & Preskill, H. (2001). Evaluation and organizational learning: Past, present, and future. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(3), 387–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, E. W. K. (1997). Organizational learning and the learning organization: A dichotomy between descriptive and prescriptive research. Human Relations, 50(1), 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yen, K., & Hung, S. (2007). A study of the opinions of elementary school teachers on the ministry of education trial on “teacher professional development evaluation”: An example of Taipei county. School Administration, 50, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and method (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wendy, P.H., Wenyan, C. (2013). Teacher Evaluation as an Approach to Organizational Learning. In: Law, E.HF., Li, C. (eds) Curriculum Innovations in Changing Societies. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-359-1_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-359-1_24

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6209-359-1

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics