Skip to main content

Teachers’ Perceptions of the School as a Learning Environment for Practice-Based Research

Testing a Model that Describes Relations Between Input, Process and Outcome Variables

  • Chapter
  • 3215 Accesses

Abstract

Learning environments research has a long tradition in investigating perceptions of students and teachers of all kinds of in-school and out-of-school learning environments (Fraser, 1998, 2002, 2007). Interestingly, the vast majority of these studies has investigated student perceptions of teacher behavior or the learning environment, and related such perceptions to student outcomes, either via traditional analyses of variance, multilevel analyses, and, in exceptional cases, structural models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, D., & Bartlett, S. (2005). Practitioner research for teachers. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance. Practitioner research in the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999a). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28 (15), 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999b). Relationships of knowledge and practice. Teacher learning in communities. In A. Iran-Nejad & C. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24) (pp. 249–264). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conaway, B.J., & Mitchell, M.W. (2004). A comparison of the experiences of yearlong interns in a professional development school and on semester student teachers in a non-PDS location. Action in Teacher Education, 26(3), 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooner, D.D., & Tochterman, S.M. (2004). Life inside a professional development school: what experienced teachers learn. The Teacher Educator, 39(3), 184–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordingley, P. (2003). Research and evidence-based practice: Focusing on practice and practitioners. In L. Anderson & N. Bennet (Eds.), Developing educational leadership. Using evidence for policy and practice (pp. 104-114). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, F., van Swet, J., Beijaard, D., & Bergen, T. (2011). Aspects of school-university research networks that play a role in developing, sharing and using knowledge based on teacher research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 147–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (Ed.). (2005). Professional development schools: Schools for developing a profession. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbutt, D. (2002). The development of a research culture in secondary schools. Educational Action Research, 10(1), 123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. (2008). Using research to improve practice. The notion of evidence-based practice. In C. Day & J. Sachs (Eds.), International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers (pp. 264–290). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 3–56). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1998). Science learning environments: Assessment, effects and determinants. In B. J. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 527–564). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (2002). Learning environments research: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. In S. C. Goh & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Studies in educational learning environments: An international perspective (pp. 1–27). Singapore: World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (2007). Classroom learning environments. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp.103–125). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, P., & Gauld, C. (1990). Labwork and students’ attitudes. In E. Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.), The student laboratory and the science curriculum (pp. 132–156). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groundwater-Smith, S., & Dadds, M. (2006). Critical practitioner inquiry: Towards responsible professional communities of practice. In C. Day & J. Sachs (Eds.), International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers (pp. 238–263). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. M., & van Tassel, F. (2005). The professional development school as a learning organization. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(2), 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henson, R. K. (2001). The effects of participation in teacher research on teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 819–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes Group. (1990). Tomorrow’s schools: Principles for the design of professional development schools. East Lansing: Holmes Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, R. S., & Power, B. M. (1993). The art of classroom inquiry: A handbook for teacher researchers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, R. S., & Power, B. M. (1999). Living the questions: A guide for teacher researchers. York: ME: Stenhouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. L. (2003). Teachers as researchers: Qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment (2nd edition). London: Routledge Farmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs. The four levels (3rd edition). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publisher, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger, M. L. (2010). Leading schools in the knowledge society: On the way to leaders of learning in inquiry-based schools. In A. H. Normore (Ed.), Global perspectives on educational leadership reform: The development and preparation of leaders of learning and learners of leadership (pp. 397–417). Binley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2004). A handbook for teacher research. From design to implementation. Glasgow: Bell & Bain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B.B., & Rock, T.C. (2003). The effects of collaborative action research on preservice and experienced teacher partners in professional development schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 54 (2), 135–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, P., Meirink, J., Lockhorst, D., & Oolbekkink-Marchand, H. (2010). (Leren) onderzoeken door docenten in het voortgezet onderwijs [Teachers (learn to) do research in Dutch secondary education]. Pedagogische Studiën, 87, 232–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, G. E. (2000). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mule, L. (2006). Preservice teachers’ inquiry in a professional development school context: Implications for the practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (1999). Mplus user’s guide (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE). (2001). Standards for professional development schools. Washington, DC: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, P. (2002a). Actieonderzoek door docenten: Uitvoering en begeleiding in theorie en praktijk [Action research by teachers: executing and supervising in theory and practice]. Doctoral dissertation. Apeldoorn/Leuven: Garant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, P. (2002b). Onderwijs van eigen makelij: Actie onderzoek in scholen en opleiding [Home grown education: Action research in schools and teacher education courses]. Soest: Nelissen BV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, P., Ax, J., Beijaard, D., & Wubbels, T. (2004). Teachers’ development of professional knowledge through action research and the facilitation of this by teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 571–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, P. (2005). A critically constructed concept of action research as a tool for the professional development of teachers. Journal of In-service Education, 31 (2), 273–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schussler, D. L. (2006). The altered role of experienced teachers in professional development schools: The present and its possibilities. Issues in Teacher Education, 15 (2), 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrigley, R. L., Koballa, T. R., & Simpson, R. D. (1988). Defining attitude for science educators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 659–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S., & Tamir, P. (1972). Research on teaching in the natural sciences. In R. M. W. Travers (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching (pp. 1098–1148). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snoek, M., & Moens, E. (2011). The impact of teacher research on teacher learning in academic training schools in the Netherlands. Professional Development in Education, 37 (5), 817–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow-Gerono, J.L. (2005). Professional development in a culture of inquiry: PDS teachers identify the benefits of professional learning communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teitel, L. (2003). The professional development schools handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verschuren, P. (1991). Structurele modellen tussen theorie en praktijk [Structural models between theory and practice]. Utrecht: Het Spectrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrijnsen-de Corte, M. (2012). Researching the teacher-researcher: practice-based research in Dutch professional development schools. Doctoral dissertation. Eindhoven: ESoE/Eindhoven University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, A. (2006). So what exactly do teacher-researchers think about doing research? Support for Learning, 21 (1), 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, N. (2004). Trying to build a research culture in a school: trying to find the right questions to ask. Teacher Development, 8 (2 & 3), 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K. M., & Noffke, S. E. (2001). Practitioner research. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 298–330). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Corte, M.Vd., Brok, P.d., Bergen, T., Kamp, M. (2013). Teachers’ Perceptions of the School as a Learning Environment for Practice-Based Research. In: Khine, M.S. (eds) Application of Structural Equation Modeling in Educational Research and Practice. Contemporary Approaches to Research in Learning Innovations. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-332-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships