Skip to main content

The Camte Framework

A Tool for Developing Proficient Mathematics Teaching in Preschool

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Mathematics Teaching and Learning ((MTAL))

Abstract

This chapter is concerned with developing teachers’ knowledge for teaching mathematics in preschool. Like Alan Schoenfeld, we are concerned with teachers, in this case preschool teachers, knowing school mathematics in depth and in breadth. Like Günter Törner, one of the founders of theMAVI (Mathematical Views) conference, we are concerned with the affective side of teacher education. The framework we present in this chapter combines both cognitive and affective aspects related to facilitating proficient mathematics teaching in preschool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allinder, R. M. (1994). The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 86–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arcavi, A. (2004). Education of mathematics teachers. In Educating for the future. Proceedings of an International Symposium on Mathematics Teacher Education (pp. 227–238). Malmö, Sweden: The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers and Early Childhood Australia (AAMT/ECA). (2006). Position paper on early childhood mathematics. Retrieved January 20, 2009, from http://www.aamt.edu.au/documentation/statements.

  • Ball, D., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroody, A. J. (1987). Children’s mathematical thinking: A developmental framework for preschool, primary, and special education teachers. New York: Teacher’s College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, S., Gillis, M., Smith, T., Lavalette, M., Liss-Bronstein, L., Lowe, E., North, W., Russo, E., & Wilder, T. D. (2009). First grade teachers’ knowledge of phonological awareness and code concepts: Examining gains from an intensive form of professional development and corresponding teacher attitudes. Reading and Writing, 22(4), 425–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farran, D. C., Lipsey, M., Watson, B., & Hurley, S. (2007). Balance of content emphasis and child content engagement in Early Reading First program. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. (1978). The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, H. P. (2006). Mathematical Play and Playful Mathematics: A guide for early education. In D. G. Singer, R. Michnick Golinkoff, & K. Hirsh-Paslek (Eds.), Play = Learning. How play motivates and enhances children’s social-emotional growth (pp. 145–168). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H. P., Lee, J. S., & Boyd, J. S. (2008). Mathematics education for young children: What it is and how to promote it. Social Policy Report, XXII(I), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, G., & Betz, N. (1989). An exploration of the mathematics self-efficacy/mathematics performance correspondence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israel National Mathematics Preschool Curriculum (INMPC). (2008). Retrieved April 7, 2009, from http://meyda.education.gov.il/files/Tochniyot_Limudim/KdamYesodi/Math1.pdf.

  • Kaiser, G. (2002). Educational philosophies and their influence on mathematics education? An ethnographic study in English and German mathematics classrooms. ZDM – Zentralblatt füĄr Didaktik der Mathematik/International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 34(6), 241–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Association for the Education of Young Children & National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NAEYC & NCTM). (2002). Position statement. Early childhood mathematics: Promoting good beginnings. Available: www.naeyc.org/resources/position_statements/psmath.htm.

  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self efficacy believes in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pehkonen, E. & Törner, G. (1999). Teachers’ professional development: What are the key change factors for mathematics teachers? European Journal of Teacher Education, 22(2–3), 259–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence.New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietsch, J., Walker, R., & Chapman, E. (2003). The relationship among self-concept, self-efficacy, and performance in mathematics during secondary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 589–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Practice Guidance for the Early Years Foundation Stage. (2008). Retrieved April 9, 2009 from www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/eyfs/resources/downloads/practice-guidance.pdf.

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1999). Looking toward the 21st century: Challenges of educational theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2011). Toward professional development for teachers grounded in a theory of decision making. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 43, 457–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H., & Kilpatrick, J. (2008). Toward a theory of proficiency in teaching mathematics. In D. Tirosh & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education: Tools and processes in mathematics teacher education (Vol. 2, pp. 321–354). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, P., Klein, A., Chang, I., Qi, D., Lijuan, P., & Yang, Z. (1999). Environmental supports for young children’s mathematical development in China and the United States. Albuquerque, NM: Society for Research in Child Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swars, S. L., Daane, C. J., & Giesen, J. (2006). Mathematics anxiety and mathematics teacher efficacy: What is the relationship in elementary preservice teachers? School Science and Mathematics, 106(7), 306–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabach, M., Levenson, E., Barkai, R., Tirosh, D. Tsamir, P., & Dreyfus, T. (2010). Secondary school teachers’ awareness of numerical examples as proof. Research in Mathematics Education, 12(2), 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirosh, D., & Tsamir, P., Levenson, E., & Tabach, M. (2011). From preschool teachers’ professional development to children’s knowledge: Comparing sets. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Törner, G. (2002). Mathematical beliefs. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 73–94). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsamir, P., & Tirosh. (2009). Affect, subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: The case of a kindergarten teacher. In J. Maaß & W. Schläglman (Eds.), Beliefs and attitudes in mathematics education: New research results (pp. 19–32) Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D., & Levenson, E. (2008). Intuitive nonexamples: The case of triangles. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M. & Johnson, D. (2011). Exploring literacy teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: Potential sources at play. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 751–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, K. (2002). The potential benefits of teacher efficacy doubts for educational reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attainment of self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D., Levenson, E., Barkai, R., Tabach, M. (2013). The Camte Framework. In: Li, Y., Moschkovich, J.N. (eds) Proficiency and Beliefs in Learning and Teaching Mathematics. Mathematics Teaching and Learning. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-299-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships