Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Technology Education Studies ((ITES))

Abstract

Teachers are under no obligation to accept or develop a philosophy about what they do, but there is an obligation to think about what they do and why they do it; it is irresponsible not to.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Archer, B. (1986). The Three R’s in Technology in Schools. A. Cross and B. McCormick (Eds.) Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. (2012). Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown Business, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Education Council (1989). Common and Agreed National Goals for Schooling in Australia. Melbourne: The Curriculum Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, E. (1897). Equality. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronowski, J. (1964). Science and Human Values. London: Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butts, F. (1980). Curriculum for the educated citizen. Educational Leadership, October, p. 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, M. (1987). Technology and the humanities. The Weaver, 5(2), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M. (2009). Shop Class as Soulcraft. New York, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Camp, L.S. (1963). The Ancient Engineers. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellul, Jacques. (1965). The Technological Society. London: Jonathon Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Educational Policies Commission (1944). Imperative Educational Needs of Youth. Wash D.C.: National Educational Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feibleman, J. (1982). Technology and reality. The Hague: Martiness Nijhoff Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, R. (1989). A Philosophical Framework for Understanding Technology. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 27(1), 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Paul. (1968). People or Personnel. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (1986). National Policy of Education. http://www.educationforallinindia.com/

  • Hogan, G. (1991). President writes. Technology and Design Education 2(3), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitwood, T. (1980). The world refashioned for human use. NUQ, 483–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G. (1982). Issues and Alternatives in Educational Philosophy. Berrien Springs, MI: Andrews University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesthene, E. (1970). Technological Change. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H. (1971). The Children of Frankenstein. Indiana: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, L. (1934). Technics and civilization. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacey, A. (1984). The culture of technology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pannabecker, J. (1991). Technological Impacts and Determinism in Technology Education: Alternate Metaphors from Social Constructivism. Journal of Technology Education, 3(1), 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Playfair, L. (1861). Photogrpahy at the Industrial Exhibition of 1862. British Journal of Photography, August 1, 263–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P. (1987) The empire of total technology. The Times Higher Education Supplement, September 4, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shermis, S. (1967). Philosophic Foundations of Education. New York: D.Van Nostrand Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, C; Holmyard, E. & Hall, A. (Eds) (1958) A history of Technology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walden, D. (1981). The two faces of technological utopianism. The Journal of General Education, 33(1), 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, Alvin M. (1966). Can technology replace social engineering? University of Chicago Magazine, 59, 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, P.J. (2012). Introduction. In: Williams, P.J. (eds) Technology Education for Teachers. International Technology Education Studies. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-161-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics