Skip to main content

The Language of Images

  • Chapter
The Edusemiotics of Images

Part of the book series: Educational Futures ((EDUFUT,volume 55))

  • 906 Accesses

Abstract

In Jerome Bruner’s famous empirical study in the field of cognitive psychology participants were presented with a set of cards for the purpose of the so-called concept attainment task. The findings, however, did not match the experimenters’ expectations. The cards were in due course interpreted by the participants, but not according to the logic anticipated by the researchers. In fact, as a result of the experiment, the study’s subjects were proclaimed to be “plainly involved in forming ‘dramatic hypotheses’ … They … were not ‘processing’ the cards in the analytic way. …They were constructing narratives and, like good literary critics, looking for metaphoric kinship between them” (Bruner, 1986, p. 92).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aphek, E., & Tobin, Y. (1989). The semiotics of fortune-telling (Vol. 22, Foundations of Semiotics). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borch-Jacobsen, M. (1988). The Freudian subject (C. Porter, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. (1990). Sources of semiotics: Readings with commentary from antiquity to the present. Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, P. (1993). The alchemist (Reissue ed.). Australia: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, J. (1990). Basics of semiotics. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, J. (2001). Four ages of understanding: The first postmodern survey of philosophy from ancient times to the turn of the twenty-first century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, J. (2007). Intentionality and semiotics: A story of mutual fecundation. Chicago: University of Scranton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1990). The logic of sense (M. Lester & C. Stivale, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1993). The fold: Leibniz and the Baroque (T. Conley, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (P. Patton, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations, 1972–1990 (M. Joughin, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (2003). Francis Bacon: The logic of sensation (D. W. Smith, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? (H. Tomlinson & G. Burchell, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (1987). Dialogues (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1925/1958). Experience and nature. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1932/1998). Moral judgment and knowledge. From Ethics. In L. A. Hickman & T. M. Alexander (Eds.), The essential Dewey, Vol. 2, Ethics, logic, psychology (pp. 328–340). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933/1998). Analysis of reflective thinking. From How we think. In L. A. Hickman & T. M. Alexander (Eds.), The essential Dewey, Vol. 2, Ethics, logic, psychology (pp. 137–144). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1934/1980). Art as experience. New York: Perigee Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1991). How we think. New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M. (1980). The game of Tarot: From Ferrara to Salt Lake City. London: Gerald Duckworth & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1997a). Two problems in textual interpretation. In R. Capozzi (Ed.), Reading Eco: An anthology (pp. 34–52). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1997b). Universe of The Mind: A semiotic theory of culture. In R. Capozzi (Ed.), Reading Eco: An anthology (pp. 53–58). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egorov, B. F. (1977). The simplest semiotic system and the typology of plots. In D. P. Lucid (Ed.), Soviet semiotics: An anthology (pp. 77–86). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faivre, A. (1994). Access to western esotericism. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gad, I. (1994). Tarot and individuation: Correspondences with Cabala and alchemy. York Beach, ME: Nicholas-Hays, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, J. W. (1997). Dewey and Eros: Wisdom and desire in the art of teaching. New York & London: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D. R. (1986). Bohm and Whitehead on wholeness, freedom, causality, and time. In D. R. Griffin (Ed.), Physics and the ultimate significance of time (pp. 127–153). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guattari, F. (1995). Chaosmosis: An ethico-aesthetic paradigm (P. Bains & J. Pefanis, Trans.). Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiraud, P. (1975). Semiology (G. Gross, Trans.). London & Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeren, J. W., & Mason, M. (1984). Seeing and believing: A study of contemporary spiritual readers. Semiotica, 50(3/4), 191–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, J. (1972). The myth of analysis: Three essays in archetypal psychology. New York: New York: Harper & Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, J. (1993). Signs of meaning in the universe (B. J. Haveland, Trans.). Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1974). The prison-house of language: A critical account of structuralism and Russian formalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch, E. (1980). The self-organizing universe: Scientific and human implications of the emerging paradigm of evolution. Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (1953–1979). Collected works (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.): H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler, W. M. McGuire. (Eds.). Princeton University Press. [cited as CW]

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (1963). Memories, dreams, reflections (R. Winston & C. Winston, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, L. H. (2010). Virtual logic - An introduction. In I. Semetsky (Ed.), Semiotics education experience (pp. 175–202). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. A. (1993). The origins of order: Self organization and selection in evolution. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. A. (2008). Reinventing the sacred: A new view of science, reason, and religion. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, J. A. S., & Engstrøm, D. A. (2006). The complementary nature. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. (1984). Revolution in poetic language (M. Waller, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo, E. (1991). The age of bifurcation: Understanding the changing world. Philadelphia: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo, E. (1995). The interconnected universe: Conceptual foundations of transdisciplinary unified theory. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo, E. (2004/2007). Science and the Akashic field: An integral theory of everything. Rochester, VT: Inner Traditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecomceva, M. I., & Uspenskij, B. A. (1977). Describing a semiotic system with a simple syntax. In D. P. Lucid (Ed.), Soviet semiotics: An anthology (pp. 65–76). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, S. (2006). Programming the universe: A quantum computer scientist takes on the cosmos. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotman, Y. M. (1990). Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture (A. Shukman, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. (2006). The gnostics: The first Christian heretics. Harpenden: Pocket Essentials.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1980). The Guttenberg galaxy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrell, F. (2002). Learning living, living learning: Signs, between East and West. New York, Toronto: Legas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. R. (1999). Plotinus on body and beauty: Society, philosophy, and religion in third-century Rome. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2010). The maternal factor: Two paths to morality. Berkeley: The University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nöth, W. (1995). Handbook of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peat, F. D. (1997). Infinite potential: The life and times of David Bohm. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1931–1935). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 1860–1911 (Vol. I–VIII, edited by Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss and Arthur Burks). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [cited as CP].

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. (1989). What is culture? Toward a semiotic explication of anthropological concepts. In W. A. Koch (Ed.), The nature of culture: Proceedings of the International and Interdisciplinary Symposium, October 7–11, 1986 (pp. 240–295). Bochum: Brockmeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, A. (1985). Jung and the post-Jungians. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. (1991). Communication. In A sign is just a sign (Advances in semiotics) (pp. 23–35). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semetsky, I. (2000). The end of a semiotic fallacy. Semiotica 130(3/4), 283–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semetsky, I. (2009). Reading signs: Semiotics and depth psychology. Semiotica, 176(1/4), 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semetsky, I. (2010a). Moral stumbling: When ethics recapitulates ontology. In I. Semetsky (Ed.), Semiotics education experience (pp. 53–70). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semetsky, I. (2010b). When Cathy was a little girl: The healing praxis of Tarot images. International Journal of Children’s Spirituality, 15(1), 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semetsky, I. (2011a). Re-symbolization of the self: Human development and Tarot hermeneutic. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Semetsky, I. (2011b). Tarot images and spiritual education: The three Is model. International Journal of Children’s Spirituality, 16(3), 249–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimony, A. (1989). Search for a worldview which can accommodate our knowledge of microphysics. In J. T. Cushing & E. McMullin (Eds.), Philosophical consequences of quantum theory: Reflections on Bell’s theorem. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shlain, L. (1998). The alphabet versus the goddess: The conflict between word and image. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, K. (1984). The subject of semiotics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolin, L. (2001). Three roads to quantum gravity. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonesson, G. (1989). Pictorial concepts. Inquiries into the semiotic heritage and its relevance to the analysis of the visual world. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stivale, C. J. (1998). The two-fold thought of Deleuze and Guattari: Intersections and animations. New York, London: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Eenwyk, J. R. (1997). Archetypes & strange attractors: The chaotic world of symbols Toronto: Inner City Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J. (1979). Principles of biological autonomy. New York: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, F. (1966). The art of memory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Semetsky, I. (2013). The Language of Images. In: The Edusemiotics of Images. Educational Futures, vol 55. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-055-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships