Skip to main content

The Paradox of Inquiry

  • Chapter
The Edusemiotics of Images

Part of the book series: Educational Futures ((EDUFUT,volume 55))

  • 869 Accesses

Abstract

Tarot edusemiotics creates in practice an unorthodox experimental “foundation” for moral knowledge, both actual and potential, and should help us in repairing what Isaiah Berlin (1990), borrowing a phrase from Marx, called the crooked timber of humanity. Tarot images create an adventure story of our learning in the school of life, with its many events and experiences. Indeed, the “stories lives tell” (Witherell & Noddings, 1991), which unfold when the pictures are read and interpreted in the context of a particular layout (Semetsky, 2011), bind together disparate events and amount to what Charles Taylor (1989) called the quest for the Good.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ansell-Pearson, K. (1997). Deleuze outside/outside Deleuze. In K. Ansell-Pearson (Ed.), Deleuze and philosophy: The difference engineer (pp. 1–22). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anton, J. P. (2000). Archetypal principles and hierarchies: Essays on neoplatonic themes. Themata Neoplatonica, International Society for Neoplatonic Studies, Binghamton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anton, J. P. (2001). The three faces of truth: Mythos, episteme, philosophia. In K. Boudouris (Ed.), Greek philosophy and epistemology (Vol. 1, pp. 11–28). Athens: Ionia Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, M. W., Pettit, P., & Slote, M. (1997). Three methods of ethics: A debate. Oxford: Wiley- Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. (1985). Towards a solution of the learning paradox. Review of Educational Research, 55(2), 201–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I. (1990). The crooked timber of humanity: Chapters in the history of ideas. H. Hardy (Ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogue, R. (2008). Search, Swim and See: Deleuze’s apprenticeship in signs and pedagogy of images. In I. Semetsky (Ed.), Nomadic education: Variations on a theme by Deleuze and Guattari (pp. 1–16). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (1995). Understanding John Dewey: Nature and cooperative intelligence. Chicago & La Salle, IL: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, J. (1990). Basics of semiotics. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deely, J. (2001). Four ages of understanding: The first postmodern survey of philosophy from ancient times to the turn of the twenty-first century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1986). Cinema 1: The movement-image (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1990). The logic of sense (M. Lester & C. Stivale, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1991). Bergsonism (H. Tomlinson, Trans.). New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1993). The fold: Leibniz and the Baroque (T. Conley, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (P. Patton, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations, 1972–1990 (M. Joughin, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (R. Hurley, M. Seem & H. R. Lane, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? (H. Tomlinson & G. Burchell, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (1987). Dialogues (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1996). Kinds of minds: Toward an understanding of consciousness: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916/1924). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1922/1988). Human nature and conduct. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The middle works of John Dewey, 1899–1924 (Vol. 14). Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1925/1958). Experience and nature. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1934/1980). Art as experience. New York: Perigee Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1934/1998). Religion versus the religious. From A common faith. In L. A. Hickman & T. M. Alexander (Eds.), The essential Dewey, Vol. 1: Pragmatism, education, democracy (pp. 401–410). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1959). Moral principles in education. New York: The Wisdom Library, a Division of Philosophical Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1991). How we think. New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W. (1975). Mass action in the nervous system. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W. (1999). How brains make up their minds. London: Weidenfield & Nicholson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. (1998). What is abduction? The fundamental problem of contemporary epistemology. Transactions of Charles S. Peirce Society, 34, 503–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, J. (1993). Signs of meaning in the universe (B. J. Haveland, Trans.). Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (2001). Language in the ecology of mind. In P. Cobley (Ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics (pp. 52–65). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch, E. (1980). The self-organizing universe: Scientific and human implications of the emerging paradigm of evolution. Oxford & New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joughin, M. (1995). Translator’s notes. In Deleuze, G. Negotiations, 1972–1990 (pp. 183–203). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (1953–1979). Collected works (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.): H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler, W. M. McGuire. (Eds.). Princeton University Press. [cited as CW].

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, L. H. (1996). Virtual logic. Systems Research, 13(3), 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, R. (2001). The god who may be: A hermeneutics of religion. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, J. A. S., & Engstrøm, D. A. (2006). The complementary nature. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom, J. F. (1993). The rediscovery of the unconscious. In H. J. Morowitz & J. L. Singer (Eds.), The mind, the brain, and complex adaptive systems (Vol. 22, pp. 123–143). Santa Fe Institute, Studies in the Sciences of Complexity: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. (2002). Joyful revolt. In M. Zournazi (Ed.), Hope: New philosophies for change (pp. 64–77). Annandale, NSW: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T., & Kahn, R. (2010). Education out of bounds: Reimagining cultural studies for a posthuman age. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L. (2001). Abduction, reason, and science: Processes of discovery and explanation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merrell, F. (1992). Signs, textuality, world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1999). Comments on ‘Dewey, Peirce and the learning paradox.’ American Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 83–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2010). The maternal factor: Two paths to morality. Berkeley: The University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N., & Shore, P. J. (1984). Awakening the inner eye: Intuition in education. New York & London: Teachers College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olshewsky, T. (2001). Grasping the starting-points. In K. Boudouris (Ed.), Greek philosophy and epistemology (Vol. 1, pp. 141–155). Athens: Ionia Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1931–1935). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 1860–1911 (Vol. I–VIII, edited by Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss and Arthur Burks). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [cited as CP]

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. (2004). The road to reality: A complete guide to the laws of the universe. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R., Shimony, A., Cartwright, N., & Hawking, S. (1997). The large, the small, and the human mind. UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petitot, J. (1995). Morphodynamics and Attractor Syntax: Constituency in Visual Perception and Cognitive Grammar. In R. F. Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition (pp. 227–281). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (1999). The essential Plato (B. Jowett, Trans.). Introduction by Alain De Botton: Book-of-the-Month Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prawat, R. (1999). Dewey, Peirce and the learning paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 36(1), 47–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salanskis, J.-M. (1996). Idea and destination. In P. Patton (Ed.), Deleuze: A critical reader (pp. 58–78). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheman, N. (2001). Non-negotiable demands: Metaphysics, politics, and the discourse of needs. In J. Floyd & S. Shieh (Eds.), Future pasts: The analytic tradition in twentieth-century philosophy (pp. 315–337): Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semetsky, I. (2005). Learning by abduction: A geometrical interpretation. Semiotica, 157(1/4), 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semetsky, I. (2006). Deleuze, education and becoming. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semetsky, I. (2008). Resolving the Socratic paradox: A semiotic approach. In K. Boudouris & M. Knezevic (Eds.), Paideia: Education in the global era (pp. 207–221). Athens: Ionia Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semetsky, I. (2009). Deleuze as a Philosopher of Education: Affective Knowledge/Effective Learning. The European legacy: Toward new paradigms, 14(4), 443–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semetsky, I. (2011). Re-symbolization of the self: Human development and Tarot hermeneutic.Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimony, A. (1997). On mentality, quantum mechanics and the actualization of potentialities. In R. Penrose, A. Shimony, N. Cartwright, & S. Hawking, The large, the small, and the human mind (pp. 144–160). UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolensky, P. (1988). On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 11, 1–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smolensky, P. (1991). Connectionism, constituency and the language of thought. In B. Lower & G. Rey (Eds.), Meaning in mind: Fodor and his critics (pp. 201–227). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapp, H. P. (2007). Mindful universe: Quantum mechanics and the participating observer. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, R. (1985). From the icon to the symbol. In R. E. Innis (Ed.), Semiotics: An introductory anthology (pp. 275–291). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tubbs, N. (2005). Philosophy of the teacher. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(2), 184–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J. (1999). Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom and cognition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1961). Adventures of ideas. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1966). Modes of thought. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality: An essay in cosmology (Corrected ed.). D. R. Griffin & D. W. Sherburne (Eds.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2011). Gilles Deleuze’s philosophy of time: A critical introduction and guide. Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witherell, C., & Noddings, N. (Eds.). (1991). Stories lives tell: Narrative and dialogue in education. New York & London: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Semetsky, I. (2013). The Paradox of Inquiry. In: The Edusemiotics of Images. Educational Futures, vol 55. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-055-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships