Skip to main content

Consequential Validity and Science Identity Research

  • Chapter
Identity Construction and Science Education Research

Part of the book series: Bold Visions in Educational Research ((BVER,volume 35))

Abstract

While my research focuses on the science identities performed by women of color, my overarching concern is with social justice. Thus, the first thing I want to ensure about my own work is that it can be used to increase equity, in or out of science, in some way. I think of this as ensuring that it has consequential validity. Consequential validity usually refers to whether test score use is valid (Popham, 2005).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barman CR. How do students really view science and scientists? Science and Children. 1996;34(1):30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barman CR. Students’ views about scientists and school science: Engaging K-8 teachers in a national study. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 1999;10:43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton AC. Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1998;35:379–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton AC, Tan E, Rivet A. Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal. 2008;45:68–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu SJ, Barton AC, Clairmont N, Locke D. Developing a framework for critical science agency through case study in a conceptual physics context. Cultural Studies of Science Education. 2009;4:345–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu SJ, Calabrese Barton A. Developing a sustained interest in science among urban minority youth. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2007;44:466–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickhouse NW, Lowery P, Schultz K. What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2000;37:441–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickhouse NW, Potter JT. Young women’s scientific identity formation in an urban context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2001;38:965–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown B, Reveles J, Kelly G. Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science learning. Science Education. 2005;89:779–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown SW. Hispanic students majoring in science or engineering: What happened in their educational journeys? Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. 2002;8:123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buxton CA. Social problem solving through science: An approach to critical, place-based, science teaching. Equity & Excellence in Education. 2010;43:120–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlone, H. (2003). (Re)producing good science students: Girls’ participation in high school physics. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9, 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlone H, Haun-Frank J, Webb A. Assessing equity beyond knowledge- and skills-based outcomes: A comparative ethnography of two fourth grade reform-based science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2011a;48:459–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlone H, Johnson A. Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2007;44:1187–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlone, H., Kimmel, J., Lowder, C., Rockford, J., & Scott, C. (2011). Exploring the scope and limit of agency in the figured worlds of school science learning: A longitudinal study of students’ identities. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceglie, R. (2011). Support in the science pipeline: Support factors and persistence of women of color in the sciences. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • College Board. (2010). Summary reports: 2010. Retrieved from http://www.collegeboard.com/student/testing/ap/exgrd_sum/2010.html

  • Elmesky R, Seiler G. Movement expressiveness, solidarity and the (re)shaping of African American students’ scientific identities. Cultural Studies of Science Education. 2007;2:73–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPI. (2010). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers: Economic Policy Institute briefing paper #278. Retrieved from www.epi.org

  • Erickson F. Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In: Wittrock M, editor. Handbook of Research on Teaching. New York: Macmillan Library Reference; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding S. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haun-Frank, J. (2011). Altruism as an entry point: An examination of African American students’ science trajectories. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland D, Lachiotte W, Skinner D, Cain C. Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson A. Policy implications of supporting women of color in the sciences. Women, Politics and Policy. 2006;27:135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson A. Graduating underrepresented African American, Latino, and American Indian students in science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. 2007a;13:1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson A. Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color. Science Education. 2007b;91:805–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson A, Anderson SC, Norlock K. A moral imperative: Retaining women of color in science education. Atlantis: A Women’s Studies Journal. 2009;33(2):72–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson A, Brown J, Carlone H, Cuevas A. Authoring identity amidst the treacherous terrain of science: A multiracial feminist examination of the journeys of three women of color in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2011;48:339–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CP. Levels of racism: A theoretic framework and a gardener’s tale. American Journal of Public Health. 2000;90:1212–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozol J. The shame of the nation. NY: Crown Publishing; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., & Orfield, G. (2007). Historic reversals, accelerating resegregation, and the need for new integration strategies: Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles, UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning K. Roger Arliner Young, scientist. Sage: A Scholarly Journal on Black Women. 1989;6(2):3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDuffie Jr TE. Scientists–geeks and nerds? Science and Children. 2001;38(8):16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCES. (2009). Figure 14-2: Average science scale scores, by grade and race/ethnicity: 2009. Retrieved from the U.S. Department of Education: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/figures/figure-scp-2.asp

  • NSF. (2010). Science and engineering degrees, by race/ethnicity of recipients: 1997–2006. Detailed statistical table NSF 10300. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf10300/

  • NSF. (2011). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Special report NSF 11—309. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/

  • Ong M, Wright C, Espinosa L, Orfield G. Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review. 2011;81(2):172–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popham J. Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Boston, MA: Pearson; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahm, J. (2007). Urban youths’ identity projects and figured worlds: Case studies of youths’ hybridization in science practices at the margin. Paper presented at the The Chicago Springer Forum, Science Education in an Age of Globalization. Retrieved from http://www.educ.uvic.ca/faculty/mroth/chicago/

  • Reveles JM, Cordova R, Kelly GJ. Science literacy and academic identity formation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2004;41:1111–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth W-M. Making and remaking of self in urban schooling: Identity as dialectic. In: Kinceloe JL, Hayes K, Rose K, Anderson PM, editors. The Praeger handbook of urban education. Westport, CT: Greenwood; 2006. p. 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell ML, Atwater MM. Traveling the road to success: A discourse on persistence throughout the science pipeline with African American students at a predominantly white institution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2005;42:691–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour E, Hewitt N. Talking about leaving. Boulder: Westview Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, N. (2011). Federal data shed light on education disparities. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2011/07/01/36data.h30.html?tkn=LMTFFMD%2BTllQa1SJ8YED0zIql2%2F6Cb6xdm8n&cmp=clp-sb-ascd

  • Spradley J. The ethnographic interview. New York: Hold, Rinehart and Winston; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradley J. Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan E, Barton AC. Unpacking science for all through the lens of identities-in-practice: The stories of Amelia and Ginnie. Cultural Studies of Science Education. 2008;3:43–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonso KL. Engineering gender–gender engineering: A cultural model for belonging. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. 1999;5:365–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonso KL. Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world. Cultural Studies of Science Education. 2006;1:237–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyay B. Middle school science teachers’ perceptions of social justice: A study of two female teachers. Equity & Excellence in Education. 2010;43:56–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahur R, Barton AC, Upadhyay BR. Science education for empowerment and social change: A case study of a teacher educator in urban Pakistan. International Journal of Science Education. 2002;24:899–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johnson, A. (2012). Consequential Validity and Science Identity Research. In: Varelas, M. (eds) Identity Construction and Science Education Research. Bold Visions in Educational Research, vol 35. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-043-9_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics