Abstract
While my research focuses on the science identities performed by women of color, my overarching concern is with social justice. Thus, the first thing I want to ensure about my own work is that it can be used to increase equity, in or out of science, in some way. I think of this as ensuring that it has consequential validity. Consequential validity usually refers to whether test score use is valid (Popham, 2005).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barman CR. How do students really view science and scientists? Science and Children. 1996;34(1):30–33.
Barman CR. Students’ views about scientists and school science: Engaging K-8 teachers in a national study. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 1999;10:43–54.
Barton AC. Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 1998;35:379–394.
Barton AC, Tan E, Rivet A. Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal. 2008;45:68–103.
Basu SJ, Barton AC, Clairmont N, Locke D. Developing a framework for critical science agency through case study in a conceptual physics context. Cultural Studies of Science Education. 2009;4:345–371.
Basu SJ, Calabrese Barton A. Developing a sustained interest in science among urban minority youth. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2007;44:466–489.
Brickhouse NW, Lowery P, Schultz K. What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2000;37:441–458.
Brickhouse NW, Potter JT. Young women’s scientific identity formation in an urban context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2001;38:965–980.
Brown B, Reveles J, Kelly G. Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science learning. Science Education. 2005;89:779–802.
Brown SW. Hispanic students majoring in science or engineering: What happened in their educational journeys? Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. 2002;8:123.
Buxton CA. Social problem solving through science: An approach to critical, place-based, science teaching. Equity & Excellence in Education. 2010;43:120–135.
Carlone, H. (2003). (Re)producing good science students: Girls’ participation in high school physics. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9, 17–34.
Carlone H, Haun-Frank J, Webb A. Assessing equity beyond knowledge- and skills-based outcomes: A comparative ethnography of two fourth grade reform-based science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2011a;48:459–485.
Carlone H, Johnson A. Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2007;44:1187–1218.
Carlone, H., Kimmel, J., Lowder, C., Rockford, J., & Scott, C. (2011). Exploring the scope and limit of agency in the figured worlds of school science learning: A longitudinal study of students’ identities. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.
Ceglie, R. (2011). Support in the science pipeline: Support factors and persistence of women of color in the sciences. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.
College Board. (2010). Summary reports: 2010. Retrieved from http://www.collegeboard.com/student/testing/ap/exgrd_sum/2010.html
Elmesky R, Seiler G. Movement expressiveness, solidarity and the (re)shaping of African American students’ scientific identities. Cultural Studies of Science Education. 2007;2:73–103.
EPI. (2010). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers: Economic Policy Institute briefing paper #278. Retrieved from www.epi.org
Erickson F. Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In: Wittrock M, editor. Handbook of Research on Teaching. New York: Macmillan Library Reference; 1986.
Harding S. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1991.
Haun-Frank, J. (2011). Altruism as an entry point: An examination of African American students’ science trajectories. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.
Holland D, Lachiotte W, Skinner D, Cain C. Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1998.
Johnson A. Policy implications of supporting women of color in the sciences. Women, Politics and Policy. 2006;27:135–150.
Johnson A. Graduating underrepresented African American, Latino, and American Indian students in science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. 2007a;13:1–22.
Johnson A. Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color. Science Education. 2007b;91:805–821.
Johnson A, Anderson SC, Norlock K. A moral imperative: Retaining women of color in science education. Atlantis: A Women’s Studies Journal. 2009;33(2):72–82.
Johnson A, Brown J, Carlone H, Cuevas A. Authoring identity amidst the treacherous terrain of science: A multiracial feminist examination of the journeys of three women of color in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2011;48:339–366.
Jones CP. Levels of racism: A theoretic framework and a gardener’s tale. American Journal of Public Health. 2000;90:1212–1215.
Kozol J. The shame of the nation. NY: Crown Publishing; 2005.
Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
Lee, C., & Orfield, G. (2007). Historic reversals, accelerating resegregation, and the need for new integration strategies: Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles, UCLA.
Manning K. Roger Arliner Young, scientist. Sage: A Scholarly Journal on Black Women. 1989;6(2):3–7.
McDuffie Jr TE. Scientists–geeks and nerds? Science and Children. 2001;38(8):16–19.
NCES. (2009). Figure 14-2: Average science scale scores, by grade and race/ethnicity: 2009. Retrieved from the U.S. Department of Education: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/figures/figure-scp-2.asp
NSF. (2010). Science and engineering degrees, by race/ethnicity of recipients: 1997–2006. Detailed statistical table NSF 10300. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf10300/
NSF. (2011). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Special report NSF 11—309. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/
Ong M, Wright C, Espinosa L, Orfield G. Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review. 2011;81(2):172–209.
Popham J. Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Boston, MA: Pearson; 2005.
Rahm, J. (2007). Urban youths’ identity projects and figured worlds: Case studies of youths’ hybridization in science practices at the margin. Paper presented at the The Chicago Springer Forum, Science Education in an Age of Globalization. Retrieved from http://www.educ.uvic.ca/faculty/mroth/chicago/
Reveles JM, Cordova R, Kelly GJ. Science literacy and academic identity formation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2004;41:1111–1144.
Roth W-M. Making and remaking of self in urban schooling: Identity as dialectic. In: Kinceloe JL, Hayes K, Rose K, Anderson PM, editors. The Praeger handbook of urban education. Westport, CT: Greenwood; 2006. p. 143–153.
Russell ML, Atwater MM. Traveling the road to success: A discourse on persistence throughout the science pipeline with African American students at a predominantly white institution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2005;42:691–715.
Seymour E, Hewitt N. Talking about leaving. Boulder: Westview Press; 1997.
Shah, N. (2011). Federal data shed light on education disparities. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2011/07/01/36data.h30.html?tkn=LMTFFMD%2BTllQa1SJ8YED0zIql2%2F6Cb6xdm8n&cmp=clp-sb-ascd
Spradley J. The ethnographic interview. New York: Hold, Rinehart and Winston; 1979.
Spradley J. Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1980.
Tan E, Barton AC. Unpacking science for all through the lens of identities-in-practice: The stories of Amelia and Ginnie. Cultural Studies of Science Education. 2008;3:43–71.
Tonso KL. Engineering gender–gender engineering: A cultural model for belonging. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. 1999;5:365–404.
Tonso KL. Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world. Cultural Studies of Science Education. 2006;1:237–307.
Upadhyay B. Middle school science teachers’ perceptions of social justice: A study of two female teachers. Equity & Excellence in Education. 2010;43:56–71.
Zahur R, Barton AC, Upadhyay BR. Science education for empowerment and social change: A case study of a teacher educator in urban Pakistan. International Journal of Science Education. 2002;24:899–917.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Johnson, A. (2012). Consequential Validity and Science Identity Research. In: Varelas, M. (eds) Identity Construction and Science Education Research. Bold Visions in Educational Research, vol 35. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-043-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-043-9_12
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6209-043-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)