Skip to main content

Global Benchmarking and Partner Selection using World University Rankings and Classifications

  • Chapter
  • 1254 Accesses

Part of the book series: Global Perspectives on Higher Education ((GPHE,volume 25))

Abstract

One well accepted definition of what constitutes a world-class university has been developed by Alden and Lin (2004). Their list of Key Characteristics of World-Class Universities was adopted by Griffith University in Australia in its Research Plan 2009-2013 to define the cultural shift necessary for advancement; however quantitative evidence of progress is necessary to determine if the university is succeeding, requiring detailed benchmarking of research. Griffith University therefore developed a method, using mainly world rankings and classifications, for the selection of an appropriate grouping of universities upon which to perform global benchmarking of research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alden, J., & Lin, G. (2004). Benchmarking the Characteristics of a World-Class University: Developing an International Strategy at University Level. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on the Future of Tertiary Education in Australia. (1964–65). Tertiary Education in Australia: Report to the Australian Universities Commission (Chairman: L. H. Martin). Melbourne: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • California State Department of Education. (1960). A Master Plan for Higher Education in California, 1960–1975. Sacramento: California State Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Higher Education. (1963). Higher Education: Report of the Committee Appointed by the Prime Minister under the Chairmanship of Lord Robbins 1961–63. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith University. (2009). Strategic Plan 2009–2013. Retrieved May 8, 2012, from http://www.griffith.edu.au/about-griffith/plans-publications/pdf/strategic-plan.pdf

  • Hazelkorn, E. (2011). Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education: The Battle for World-Class Excellence. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • International Association of Universities. (2004). World List of Universities and Other Institutions of Higher Education (24th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, N. C. (2009). The story of the academic ranking of world universities. International Higher Education, 54, 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon, K. R., Walker, S. H., & Davis, D. (2000). Benchmarking: A Manual for Australian Universities. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, C. (2010). Building the world-class university of the future: Impact of age on institutional research performance. In The 6th Annual QS-Apple Conference and Exhibition. Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Mara, M. P. (2005). Cities of Knowledge: Cold War Science and the Search for the Next Silicon Valley. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quacquarelli Symonds. (2011). QS World University Rankings by Subject Social Sciences. Retrieved July 1, 2011, from http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings

  • Quirke, N. (1996). Preparing for the Future: A History of Griffith University 1971–1996. Brisbane: Boolarong Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauhvargers, A. (2011). Global University Rankings and Their Impact. Brussels: European Universities Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmi, J. (2009). The Challenge of Establishing World-Class Universities. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sheil, T. (2008). Size does matter: Strategic research policy options for small nations and their institutions in response to world university rankings. In OECD Conference: Does Size Matter? Universities Competing in a Global Market. Reykjavík.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon Fraser University. (2011). Strategic Research Plan. Retrieved August 22, 2011, from www.sfu.ca/vpresearch/docs/SRP2010_15.pdf

  • Sowter, B. (2008). World university rankings: Beneath the surface. In The 4th Annual QS-Apple Conference and Exhibition. Seoul, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelin, J. R. (2004). A History of American Higher Education. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of California, San Diego. (2011). UC San Diego Campus Profile. Retrieved March 23, 2011, from http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/about/index.html#institution

  • University of Southern Denmark. (2011). About the University of Southern Denmark. Retrieved August 22, 2011, from http://www.sdu.dk/Om_SDU

  • University of Tsukuba. (2011). Mission Statement. Retrieved August 22, 2011, from http://www.tsukuba.ac.jp/english/about/objective.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mearns, F., Sheil, T. (2013). Global Benchmarking and Partner Selection using World University Rankings and Classifications. In: Wang, Q., Cheng, Y., Liu, N.C. (eds) Building World-Class Universities. Global Perspectives on Higher Education, vol 25. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-034-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships