Abstract
“There is general agreement among psychological and sociological theorists that change is fundamental to the growth and survival of human and social systems“ (Armstrong, 2009, p. 13). Similarly, the educational change acts as the vital roles for students’ learning and their future lives. However, why have most of the curriculum changes ended in failure? Teacher resistance is the main reason that the curriculum change is a failure or only accomplished surface changes. Therefore, the question remains of how to influence teachers to accept the change; this has become an important topic for curriculum reform. Elimination of the resistance of teachers and the relevant varieties of adversity is usually thought to be the best way to manage the change - use a variety of powerful media, offensive, administrative pressure, expert influence, so that teachers accept and understand the concepts or norms of curriculum reform. These ways seem to recognize the importance of teachers in curriculum change, but it cannot often reach the desired effects. Curriculum changes are often rejected outside the classroom by teachers. The resistance of teachers is an inevitable result of change rather than the question needed to be overcome. Look at resistance as a matter that must be overcome is actually wrong and controversial (Britzma, 1992). Resistance is the primary precondition for teachers’ learning, because this indicates that they lack the knowledge and competence needed by the change. Teachers and the education system itself need time to adapt to the change.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Armstrong, (2009). Perspectives on change, transitions and passages. Administrative Passages: Navigating the Transition from Teacher to Assistant Principal (p. 13). Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York.
Britzman, (1992). The terrible problem of knowing thyself: Toward a poststructural account of teacher identity. Journal of Interdisciplinary Curriculum Studies, 9(3), 23–46.
Dalin, (2005). School Development: Theories and Strategies. First published 1998, p. 202.
Evans, (1996). Implementation: Tasks of transition. The Human Side of School Change. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, p. 63.
Fullan, (2007). Causes and processes of implementation and continuation. The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York. Teacher College.
Fullan & Miles, (1992). Getting the reform right: What works and what doesn’t. Retrieved from: http://www.theptc.org/Resources/CESarticles/Getting%20%20Reform%20Right.pdf.
Gross, (1971). Implementing Organizational Innovations. New York & London, Basic Books Inc. Library of Brock University Catalog Card Number 155998.
Hall & Hord, (2006). Developing professional learning communities and understanding organizational culture. Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles & Potholes. San Francisco: Pearson Education.
Hord, Tutherford, Huling-Austin & Hall, (1987). Taking Charge of Change. Published by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved from: http://www.nationalacademies.org/rise/backg4a.htm.
“Monitoring Change Efforts”, para. 1. Retrieved from: http://resources.sai-iowa.org/change/cbam.html.
Senge E. H. The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday; 1990.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhidong, B. (2012). An Exploration of the Driving Force Behind Teacher Resistance to Curriculum Change. In: Chen, S., Kompf, M. (eds) Chinese Scholars on Western Ideas about Thinking, Leadership, Reform and Development in Education. Critical Issues in the Future of Learning and Teaching, vol 7. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-010-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-010-1_14
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6209-010-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)