Skip to main content

Good professional work in accounting, engineering, nursing and teaching

From practice-based to research-based quality assessment?

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: The Knowledge Economy and Education ((KNOW,volume 6))

Abstract

Professionals are expected to carry out their work well and base their judgment on a system of abstract knowledge (Abbott, 1988). In return they are given a certain degree of autonomy regarding how they perform their work as well as recruitment and training to their field of expertise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions. An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P., Kwon, S.W., & Heckscher, C. (2008). Perspective - Professional work: The emergence of collaborative community. Organization Science, 19(2), 359–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, M.B. & Rousseau, D.M. (Eds.) (1996). The boundaryless career: a new employment principle for a new organizational era. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banning, C. (2005). Conceptions of evidence, evidence-based medicine, evidence-based practice and their use in nursing: independent nurse prescribers’ views. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14(4), 411–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (1999). Learning to work and working to learn. In D. Boud & J. Garrick (Eds.), Understanding learning at work (pp. 29–44). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, P. (1984). From novice to expert. California: Addision Wesley Publ. Comp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brint, S. (2001). Professionals and the “knowledge economy.” Rethinking the theory of post-industrial society. Current Sociology, 47, 101–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen B. (2008). Good work - How is it recognized by the nurse? Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(12), 1645–1651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J.G., Subrahmanian, E., & Westerberg, A.W. (2005). The “global” and the “local” in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(1), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Docherty, P., Forslin, J., & Shani, A.B. (2002). Creating sustainable work systems. Emerging perspectives and practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. & Dreyfus, S. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (2007). Learning from other people in the workplace. Oxford Review of Education, 33(4), 403–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evetts, J. (2002). New directions in state and international professional occupations: Discretionary decision-making and acquired regulation. Work, Employment, and Society, 16(2) 341–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farnham-Diggory, S. (1994). Paradigms of knowledge and instruction. Review of Educational Research, 64(3) 463–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Damon, W. (2001a). Good work. When excellence and ethics meet. USA: Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner H., Gregory A., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Damon, W., & Michaelson, M (2001b). The empirical basis of good work: Methodological considerations. Good Work Project Report Series, 3. Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge. The texture of workplace learning. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C.R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields, Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58-80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helms ley-Brown, J. & Sharp, C. (2003). How do teachers use research findings to improve their professional practice? Oxford Review of Education, 29(4), 449–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C. (2005). The experience of a good day: A phenomenological study to explain a good day as experienced by a newly qualified RN. Accident and Emergency Nursing, 13, 110–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joerges, B. & Czarniawska, B. (1998). The question of technology, or how organizations inscribe the world. Organization Studies, 19(3), 363–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karseth, B. & Nerland, M. (2007). Building professionalism in a knowledge society: Examining discourses of knowledge in four professional associations. Journal of Education and Work, 20(4), 335–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, K. (1997). Sociality with objects. Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(4), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures. How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, K. (2006). Knowledge in a knowledge society: Five transitions. Knowledge, Work and Society, 4(3) 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahn, L. C. (1995). Yrkeskompetanse i støpeskjeen [Professional competence in a melting spoon]. Thesis for dr.polit. Oslo: University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahn, L. C. (2003). Competence and learning in late career. European Educational Research Journal (online), 2(1), 126–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahn, L.C. (2010). Professional learning as epistemic trajectories. In S. Ludvigsen, I. Rasmussen, A. Lund, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites. New tools, infrastructures and practices (pp. 53–68). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (1997). Audit society. Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in practice. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sciulli, D. (2005). Continental sociology of professions today: Conceptual contributions. Current Sociology, 53, 915–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrest, H. (2002). Professionalization/professions in history, international encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J. & Horvath, J.A. (1999). Tacit knowledge in professional practice: Researcher and practitioner perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stutt, A. & Motta, E. (1998). Knowledge modelling: An organic technology for the knowledge age. In M. Eisenstadt & T. Vincent (Eds.), The knowledge web: Learning and collaboration on the net (pp. 211–224). London: KoganPage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, S. & Berg, M. (2003). The gold standard. The challenge of of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health care. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (2000). Enabling knowledge creation: How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lahn, L.C., Christiansen, B. (2012). Good professional work in accounting, engineering, nursing and teaching. In: Jensen, K., Lahn, L.C., Nerland, M. (eds) Professional Learning in the Knowledge Society. The Knowledge Economy and Education, vol 6. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-994-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships