Advertisement

Female Engineering Students

Career Attractors
  • Michelle Wallace
  • Ian Lings
  • Neroli Sheldon
  • Roslyn Cameron

Abstract

There are still relatively few women in engineering studies in Australia. In overall completions, women are outnumbered by men 5:1 in Engineering and related technologies. At the same time many industries such as mining, construction and rail are in a growth phase. However, the rail industry, particularly, is not attracting sufficient engineers and skilled technicians from within the Australian labour market and is facing widespread retirements from an ageing workforce. Rail is thus trying to actively attract early and mid-career engineers and skilled technical workers and is in competition for talent with other industries.

Keywords

Brand Equity Outcome Expectation Engineering Student Engineering Career Employer Brand 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. “Ambler T, Barrow S. The employer brand.” The Journal of Brand Management. 1996;4(3):185–206.Google Scholar
  2. Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers Australia (APESMA). 2010. Women in the Professions - The State of Play 2009-10, Executive Summary of the APESMA Women in the Professions Survey Report. Available at:Google Scholar
  3. Australasian Railway Association (ARA), The Bus Industry Confederation (BIC) and Australasian Railway Association (ARA). The Australian Railway Industry Report 2008. Canberra, Australia: The Apelbaum Consulting Group; 2008.Google Scholar
  4. Australasian Railway Association (ARA), Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). The Changing Face of Rail: A Journey to the Employer of Choice. Canberra, Australia: ARA/DEEWR; 2007.Google Scholar
  5. Australasian Railway Association (ARA), Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). 2007(b). A Rail Revolution: Future Capability Identification and Skills Development for the Australasian Rail Industry. Canberra, Australia: ARA/DEEWR.Google Scholar
  6. Berthon P, Ewing M, Hah L. “Captivating company: Dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding.” International Journal of Advertising. 2005;24(2):151–172.Google Scholar
  7. Birrell B, Sheridan J, Rapson V. “Why no action on engineering training?” People and Place. 2005;13(4):34–47.Google Scholar
  8. Blickeenstaff JC. “Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter?” Gender and Education. 2005;17(4):17–27.Google Scholar
  9. Chang, I., Hwang, H., Liu, C., and Siang, S. 2007. “A study of career anchors and job characteristic preferences of IS students” Journal of Computer Information System 47(3): 24.Google Scholar
  10. Collins CJ, Stevens R. The relationship between early recruitment-related activities and the application decisions of new labour market entrants: A brand equity approach to recruitment. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2002;87(6):1121–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2009.Google Scholar
  12. Cunningham GB, Doherty AJ, Gregg MJ. “Using social cognitive career theory to understand head coaching intentions among assistant coaches of women's teams.” Sex Roles. 2007;56:365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). 2009. Labour Market Outcomes and Experiences of Recent Engineering Graduates. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra: DEEWR.Google Scholar
  14. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). 2008. Views of Engineering Students: Report of a survey of final year university engineering students. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra: DEEWR.Google Scholar
  15. Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, 2010. The impact of a sustained gender wage gap on the Australian economy, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra; ACT. Available at: http://www.fahcsia.gov. au/sa/women/pubs/general/gender_wage_gap/Pages/p3.aspx
  16. Department of Immigration and Citizenship, 2010. General Skilled Occupations List (SOL) May 2010, Commonwealth of Australia, Department of Immigration and Citizenship: Canberra, Australia. Available at: http://www.immi.gov.au/skilled/sol/#a
  17. Diekman AB, Brown E, Johnston AM, Clark E. “Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers.” Psychological Science. 2010;21(8):1051–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dryburgh H. WORK HARD, PLAY HARD: Women and professionalization in engineering - Adapting to the culture. Gender & Society. 1999;13:664–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Engineers Australia (EA), 2010(a). Engineering sector remains well short of meeting demand, Media release, Engineers Australia, Barton, Canberra: EA.Google Scholar
  20. Engineers Australia (EA) 2010(b). The Engineering Profession — A Statistical Overview 2010, Seventh Edition. Canberra, Australia: EA.Google Scholar
  21. Engineers Australia (EA) 2010(c). Specialised Engineering Occupation — Submission to Skills Australia, Canberra, Australia: EA.Google Scholar
  22. Australia E. Inquiry into Skills Shortages in the Rail Industry — Submission to the Victorian Education and Training Committee. Canberra, Australia: EA; 2009.Google Scholar
  23. Erdem T, Swait J. “Brand equity as a signalling phenomenon”. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 1998;7(2):31–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fox MF. “Women and men faculty in academic science and engineering: Social-organizational indicators and implications.” American Behavioral Scientist. 2010;53(7):997–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fox MF, Sonnert G, Nikiforova I. Successful programs for undergraduate women in science and engineering: Adapting versus adopting the institutional environment. Research in Higher Education. 2009;50:333–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gibson, G. and Scoble, M. 2004.“’Regenderneering' the mining industry” CLM Bulletin, 97(1082): 54-60.Google Scholar
  27. Gill J, Mills J, Franzway S, Sharp R. “’Oh you must be very clever!’ High-achieving women, professional power and the ongoing negotiation of workplace identity.” Gender and Education. 2008;20(3):223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Greene JC. Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2007.Google Scholar
  29. Hapgood K. Women in engineering: A simple mathematical theory for the rate of adverse experience, a report prepared for Engineers Australia. Canberra, Australia: EA; 2007.Google Scholar
  30. Highhouse S, Lievens P, Sinar F. “Measuring attraction to organisations.” Educational and psychological Measurement. 2003;63:986–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hibbert, L. 2001. “Careers on the line” Professional Engineering 31 October, 37-38.Google Scholar
  32. Keller K. “Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity.” Journal of Marketing. 1993;57(1):1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. King R. Addressing the supply and quality of engineering graduates for the new century. Sydney, Australia: Carrick Institute; 2008.Google Scholar
  34. Lent RW, Brown S, Hackett G. “Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis.” Journal of Counselling Psychology. 2000;47(1):36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lievens, F., Van Hoye, G., and Anseel, F. 2007. “Organizational identity and employer image: Towards a unifying framework” British Journal of Management 18(Issue Supplement): 45-49Google Scholar
  36. Lievens F, Highhouse S. “The relation of industrial and symbolic attributions and a company’s attractiveness as an employer.” Personal Psychology. 2003;56(1):75–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lievens F, Van Hoye G, Schreurs B. “Examining the relationship between employer knowledge dimensions and organizational attractiveness: An application in a military context.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2005;78:553–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Male, S. A., Bush, M. B., and Murray, K. 2009. Gender typing and engineering competencies, paper presented at the 20th Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, University of Adelaide, 6-9 December 2009.Google Scholar
  39. Manpower 2009a. 2009. Talent Shortage Survey Results, Manpower Services (Australia) Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
  40. Manpower 2009b. Insights into Engineering Professionals (Australia), Manpower Services (Australia) pty Ltd.Google Scholar
  41. McDonald K, Hite L. “Reviving the relevance of career development in human resource development.” Human Resource Development Review. 2005;4(4):418–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McCuen R, Greenberg J. “Educating Guidance Counsellors on Engineering as a Career and Academic Choice.” Journal of professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 2009;135(3):91–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Patton W, McMahon M. A systems theory framework of career development, career development and systems theory: A new relationship. New York: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company; 2006.Google Scholar
  44. Phipps A. “Re-inscribing gender binaries: Deconstructing the dominant discourse around women's equality in science, engineering, and technology.” The Sociological Review. 2007;55(4):768–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Plano Clark V, Creswell J. The mixed methods reader. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications; 2008.Google Scholar
  46. Rainey L, Simons M, Pudney V, Hughes E. What choice? An evaluation of career development services for young people. Adelaide, Australia: National Centre for Vocational Education Research; 2008.Google Scholar
  47. Schein E. “Career anchors revisited: Implications for career development in the 21st century.” Academy of Management Executive. 1996;10(4):80–89.Google Scholar
  48. Slaughter J, Zickar M, Highhouse S, Mohr D. “Personality trait inferences about organizations: Development of a measure and assessment of construct validity.” Journal of Applied Psychology. 2004;89:85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Springs S, Seong Y, Watkins M, Tinnin D. Capturing Judgment Policy on College Admissions: A Preliminary Look at the Gender Gap in Engineering Field from the Lens Model Perspective. Norcross: IIE Annual Conference; 2006. p. 1–6.Google Scholar
  50. Stanton Smith, W. 2005/06. “Employers and the new generation of employees” Community College Journal 76(3): 8-14.Google Scholar
  51. Vrcelj Z, Krishnan S. “Gender differences in student attitudes toward engineering and academic careers.” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. 2008;14(2):43–56.Google Scholar
  52. Wallace M, Sheldon N, Lings I, Cameron R. Rail Attraction and Image Final Report. Brisbane, Australia: CRC for Rail Innovation; 2011.Google Scholar
  53. Wallace M, Sheldon N, Lings I, Cameron R. Attraction and Image for the Australian rail industry, paper presented at the British Academy of Management Conference. UK, September: Sheffield; 2010.Google Scholar
  54. Watts, M. 2003. “The evolution of occupational gender segregation in Australia:Google Scholar
  55. Measurement and interpretation” Australian Journal of Labour Economics 6(4): 631–655Google Scholar
  56. Watts M. “Occupational gender segregation: Index measurement and econometric modelling.” Demography. 1998;35(4):489–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michelle Wallace
    • 1
  • Ian Lings
    • 2
  • Neroli Sheldon
    • 3
  • Roslyn Cameron
    • 4
  1. 1.Associate Professor of Human ResourcesSouthern Cross UniversityAustralia
  2. 2.Professor of MarketingQueensland University of TechnologyAustralia
  3. 3.Research AssociateSouthern Cross Business SchoolAustralia
  4. 4.Senior LecturerCentral Queensland UniversityAustralia

Personalised recommendations