The Appeal of Innovation

New Trends in STEMS from a Gender Point of view
  • Silvana Badaloni
  • Sonia Brondi
  • Alberta Contarello


Innovation is necessary to face the present challenges in society (Europe 2020). We know that new ideas flourish from diversity. Differences between the two genders constitute a fundamental source of diversity in society. A consequence is that society could be more innovative if both genders are equally represented and they are both able to contribute. It is more and more important that diversity of ideas in decisional processes lead to develop innovation.


Free Association Engineer Faculty Correspondence Factor Analysis Woman Scientist Woman Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Badaloni, S., Brondi, S., Contarello, A., Manganelli, A.M. 2010. “The threatened excellence. Reasoning about young women’s scientific and technological careers in Padua University, Italy.” In Proceedings of the PROMETEA International Conference. Rotterdam: Sense Publisher B.V.Google Scholar
  2. Badaloni S, Drace CA, Gia O, Levorato MC, Vidotto F, editors. Under-representation of women in Science and Technology. Padova: CLEUP; 2008a.Google Scholar
  3. Badaloni S, Contarello A, Allegrini A, Brondi S. “Science, Technology, Scientists: What do University students say? Results from an interdisciplinary enquiry at Padua University” Paper presented at ICWES (14th International Conference of Women Engineers and Scientists). Lille, July. 2008b;15–18:2008.Google Scholar
  4. Benzecri, et al. 1973. L ’analyse des données. L ’analyse des correspondances. Vol.2. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
  5. Beraud, A., EPWS. 2010. The HELENA research project. EPWS. Annual Conference, Women in Present and Future European. Brussels: Research; 2010.Google Scholar
  6. Blumberg RL. Mothers of inventions? The mith-breaking history and planetary promise of women’s key roles in subsistence technology. In: Amichai-Hamburger Y, editor. Technology and Psychological Well-being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  7. Ceci SJ, Williams WM, Barnett SM. Women’s under-representation in Science: Sociocul- tural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin. 2009;135(2):218–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Etzkowitz, H., Ranga, M. 2011. “Women in Science, Engineering and Technology: the “Field Status” Paradox.” cf.
  9. Lebart, L., Morineau, A., Becue, M., Haeusler L. 1989. Système portable pour l'analyse des données textuelles (SPAD.T), Paris: Cisia.Google Scholar
  10. Ryan, M.K., Haslam, S.A. e Kulich, C. 2010. “Politics and the glass cliff: evidence that women are preferentially selected to contest hard-to-win seats” Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34: 56–64.Google Scholar
  11. Schraudner, M. 2010. “Can gender shape the future of technology?” cfr.
  12. Schiebinger, L. 2011. “Gendered Innovations in Science, Medicine, and Technology.” cf.
  13. Steinke J. “Cultural representations of gender and science: Portrayals of female scientists and engineers in popular films”. Science Communication. 2005;27:27–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wajcman J. “Reflection of gender and technology studies: In what state is the art?” Social Study in Science. 2000;30(3):447–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvana Badaloni
    • 1
  • Sonia Brondi
    • 2
  • Alberta Contarello
    • 3
  1. 1.DEI Dept. of Information EngineeringUniversity of PaduaItaly
  2. 2.Dept. of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied PsychologyUniversity of PaduaItaly
  3. 3.Dept. of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied PsychologyUniversity of PaduaItaly

Personalised recommendations