Skip to main content

Building Counter-Power from the Ground up

Contesting ‘Ngoisation’ Through Social Movement Learning and Knowledge Production

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: International Issues in adult Education ((ADUL,volume 10))

Abstract

The chapter reflects upon tensions over learning and knowledge production in international non-governmental organisation (NGO) and social movement networks contesting global free market capitalism, now widely known as the ‘global justice movement’. It discusses aspects of NGO/social movement activist networks opposing the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum during the 1990s, and more recent activism against bilateral free trade and investment agreements, (FTAs) both in the Asia-Pacific region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allman, P. (2001). Critical education against global capitalism: Karl Marx and revolutionary critical education. Westport, CT.: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandy, J., & Smith, J. (2005). Coalitions across borders: Transnational protest and the neoliberal order. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevington, D. & Dixon, C. (2005). “Movement-relevant theory: Rethinking social movement scholarship and activism,” Social Movement Studies, 4(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bob, C. (2005). The marketing of rebellion: Insurgents, media and international activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Choudry, A. (2011). On knowledge production, learning and research in struggle. Alternate Routes. 23, 175–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudry, A. & Shragge, E. (2011). Disciplining dissent: NGOs and community organisation. Globalisations, 8(4), 503–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudry, A. (2011). Learning in struggle, Sharing knowledge: Building resistance to bilateral FTAs. In Kapoor, D. (Ed), Critical Perspectives on Neoliberal Globalisation, development and education in Africa and Asia/Pacific, (pp. 31–48). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudry, A. (2010a). What’s left? Canada’s ‘global justice’ movement and colonial amnesia. Race and Class, 52(1), 97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudry, A. (2010b). Global justice? Contesting NGOisation: Knowledge politics and containment in antiglobalisation networks. In Choudry, A, & Kapoor, D. (Eds.) (2010) Learning from the ground up: Global perspectives on social movements and knowledge production (pp. 17–34). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudry, A. (2008). NGOs, social movements and anti-APEC activism: A study in knowledge power and struggle. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Concordia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. & Ivanic, R. (1997). The politics of writing. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, R. J. F. (2005). Gramsci is dead: Anarchist currents in the newest social movements. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flacks, R. (2004). Knowledge for what? Thoughts on the state of social movement studies. In Goodwin, J. & Jasper, J. M. (Eds.), Rethinking social movements: Structure, culture, and emotion (pp. 135–153). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flusty, S. (2004). De-coca-colonization: Making the globe from the inside out. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, G. (1999). Learning in social action: A contribution to understanding informal education. London and New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, J (Ed.) (2002). Protest and globalisation: Prospects for transnational solidarity. Sydney: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R. (2004). Some recurring themes: Southall Black Sisters 1979–2003 and still going strong. In Gupta R. (Ed.), From Homebreakers to Jailbreakers: Southall Black Sisters (pp. 1–27). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holst, J. D. (2011). Frameworks for understanding the politics of social movements. Studies in the education of adults, 43(2), 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holst, J. D. (2002). Social movements, civil society, and radical adult education. Westport, CT.: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP), (2008, 29 July). “Trade talks collapse, new direction needed”. Press release. Retrieved from http://www.tradeobservatory.org/library.cfm?refID=103455.

  • INCITE! Women of Color Against Violence. (Eds.) (2007). The revolution will not be funded: Beyond the non-profit industrial complex Boston, MA.: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamat, S. (2004). The privatization of public interest: Theorizing NGO discourse in a neoliberal era. Review of International Political Economy, 11(1) (February), 155–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamat, S. (2002). Development Hegemony: NGOs and the State in India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, R. D. G. (2002). Freedom dreams: The Black radical imagination. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey, J. (1999). Reclaiming the future: New Zealand and the global economy. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsman, G. (2006). “Mapping social relations of struggle: Activism, ethnography, social organization” in Sociology for changing the world: Social movements/social research, (Ed.), Frampton, C., G. Kinsman, A.K. Thompson, and K Tilleczek. Black Point, N.S.: Fernwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (1982). Learning to write. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1968). Theses on Feuerbach. In Karl Marx and Frederich Engels: Selected Works. New York: International. Accessed online at: http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/theses/theses.htm

  • McNally, D. (2002). Another world is possible: Globalisation and anti-capitalism. Winnipeg: Arbeiter Ring.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels, R. (1978). Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. Gloucester, MA.: Peter Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menotti, V, (2008, 30 July). “Derailing Doha and the pathway to a new paradigm: How WTO’s collapse clears the way to solve today’s food, fuel, and financial crises”. International Forum on Globalisation. Retrieved from www.ifg.org/programs/derailing_doha-vmenotti-30july08.pdf

  • Newman, M. (2006). Teaching defiance: Stories and strategies for activist educators. San Francisco, CA.: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novelli, M. (2010). Learning to win: Exploring knowledge and strategy development in anti- privatization struggles in Colombia. In Choudry, A, and Kapoor, D. (Eds.), Learning from the ground up: Global perspectives on social movements and knowledge production (pp. 121–137). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrogorski, M. (1964). Democracy and the organization of political parties. Volume I: England. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petras, J. & Veltmeyer, H. (2005). Social movements and state power: Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Ecuador. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petras, J., & Veltmeyer, H. (2001). Globalisation unmasked: Imperialism in the 21st century. New Delhi: Madhyam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polet, F, and CETRI (2004). Globalizing resistance: The state of struggle. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pue, W. W. (Ed.) (1998). Pepper in our eyes: The APEC affair. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. W. (2006). Political activist as ethnographer. In Sociology for changing the world: Social movements/social research, ed. G. Kinsman, A. K. Thompson, & K. Tilleczek, pp. 44–70. Black Point, NS: Fernwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L.T. (1999). Decolonising methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, A. (2000). Naming the enemy: Anti-corporate movements confront globalisation. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, M. (2000). Traveling feminisms: From embodied women to engendered citizenship. In Burawoy, M., et al. Global ethnography: Forces, connections, and imaginations in a postmodern World (pp. 295–338). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, T. (2003). NGO Dilemmas: Trojan horses for global neoliberalism? In Panitch, L., and Leys, C. (Eds.), Socialist Register 2004: The New Imperial Challenge (pp. 202–219). London: Merlin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Choudry, A. (2012). Building Counter-Power from the Ground up. In: Hall, B.L., Clover, D.E., Crowther, J., Scandrett, E. (eds) Learnning and Educationfor a Bettter World. International Issues in adult Education, vol 10. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-979-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics