Skip to main content

Growth And New Directions? Research In Tertiary Mathematical Science Education

  • Chapter
Research in Mathematics Education in Australasia 2008–2011

Abstract

Have the quantity and quality of papers on tertiary mathematics education in Australasia changed? Are we going over the same ground, or are we venturing into new areas and exposing a vista we had not previously seen? Our review of research found indications of improved quality as well as some repetitive work. We can say that new directions are being opened up. We hope they will provoke productive research in the next four years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams P, Alcock J, Bulmer M, Grotowski J, Hong M, Jennings M, Scharaschkin V. A new enabling technology for learning and teaching quantitative skills. Melbourne, Australia: ALTC; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badcock C. Drug development—What statistical skills are required by whom and when. In: MacGillivray HL, Martin MA, editors. OZCOTS 2008 (Proceedings of the 6th Australian Conference on Teaching Statistics. Melbourne, Australia: ALTC & SSAI; 2008. p. 123–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew H, Darragh L, Ell F, Saunders J. 'I'm a natural and I do it for love!': Exploring students' accounts of studying mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2011;42(7):915–924. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2011.608863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton B. Growing understanding of undergraduate mathematics: A good frame produces better tomatoes. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2011;42(7):963–973. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2011.611911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton B, Clark C, Sheryn L. Collective dreaming: A school-university interface. New Zealand Journal of Mathematics. 2010;40:15–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton B, Sheryn L. The Pipeline Report. Berlin, Germany: ICMI; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begg A. Mathematics 101: Reconsidering the axioms. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2011;42(7):835–846. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2011.608859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belward S, Matthews K, Rylands L, Adams P, Coady C, Simbag V. A study of the Australian tertiary sector's portrayed view of the relevance of quantitative skills in science. In: Clark J, Kissane B, Mousley J, Spencer T, Thornton S, editors. Mathematics: Traditions and [new] practices (Proceedings of the 34th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia and the 23rd biennial conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers, Alice Springs. Adelaide, SA: AAMT & MERGA; 2011. p. 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgin, A. (2010). Non-statisticians learning statistics. In C. Reading (Ed.), Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence based society (Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Teaching Statistics, July, 2010, Ljubljana, Slovenia). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistics Institute. Retrieved from http://icots.net/8/cd/pdfs/contributed/ICOTS8_C147_BILGIN.pdf

  • Bilgin A, Crowe S. Approaches to learning in statistics: Cross cultural learning behaviour among university students. Asian Social Science. 2008;4(3):37–43. doi:10.5539/ass.v4n3P36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black M. Unit standard assessment involving official statistics: An evaluation of four assessment tools. In: MacGillivray HL, Martin MA, editors. OZCOTS 2008 (Proceedings of the 6th Australian Conference on Teaching Statistics. Melbourne, Australia: ALTC & SSAI; 2008. p. 128–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blyth B. Digital ink and annotations in e-teaching of advanced mathematics. MSOR Connections. 2010;9(4):18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blyth B, Labovic A. Using Maple to implement e-learning integrated with computer aided assessment. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2009;40(7):975–988. doi:10.1080/00207390903226856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britton S, Henderson J. Linear algebra revisited: An attempt to understand students' conceptual difficulties. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2009;40(7):963–974. doi:10.1080/00207390903206114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau G. Theory of didactical situations in mathematics: Didactique des mathématiques, 1970—1990. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, N., Bower, M., Skalicky, J., Wood, L. N., Donovan, D., Loch, B., … Joshi, N. (2010). A professional development framework for teaching in higher education. In M. Devlin, J. Nagy and A. Lichtenberg (Eds.), Research and development in higher education: Reshaping higher education Volume 33. Melbourne, Australia: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.herdsa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/conference/2010/papers/HERDSA2010_Brown_N.pdf

  • Chevallard Y. L'analyse des pratiques enseignantes en théorie anthropologique du didactique. Recherches en Didactique des Máthématiques. 1999;19(2):221–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark M, Lovric M. Understanding secondary-tertiary transition in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2009;40(6):755–776. doi:10.1080/00207390902912878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cretchley P. Are Australian universities promoting learning and teaching activity effectively? An assessment of the effects on science and engineering academics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2009;40(7):865–875. doi:10.1080/00207390903199228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, G. (2010). Statistics education in the social and behavioural sciences: From dichotomous thinking to estimation thinking and meta-analytic thinking. In C. Reading (Ed.), Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence based society (Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Teaching Statistics, July, 2010, Ljubljana, Slovenia). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistics Institute. Retrieved from http://icots.net/8/cd/pdfs/contributed/ICOTS8_C111_CUMMING.pdf

  • David, I., & Brown, J. (2010). Implementing the change: Teaching statistical thinking not just the methods. In C. Reading (Ed.), Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence based society (Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Teaching Statistics, July, 2010, Ljubljana, Slovenia). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistics Institute. Retrieved fromhttp://icots.net/8/cd/pdfs/contributed/ICOTS8_C155_DAVID.pdf

  • Dhand N. K., & Thomeson, P. C. (2009). Scenario-based approach for teaching biostatistics to veterinary students. In C. Reading (Ed.), Next steps in statistics education (Proceedings from the 2009 IASE Satellite Conference). Durban, South Africa: International Association for Statistics Education. Retrieved from http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications/sat09/8_3.pdf

  • Dubinsky, E. (1992).A learning theory approach to calculus. In Z. Karian, (Ed.) Symbolic computation in undergraduate mathematics education, MAA Notes, 24, (pp. 48-55). Washington, DC: MAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easdown D. Syntactic and semantic reasoning in mathematics teaching and learning. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2009;40(7):941–949. doi:10.1080/00207390903205488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fidler, F. (2010). The American Psychological Association publication manual sixth edition: Implications for statistics education. In C. Reading (Ed.), Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence based society (Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Teaching Statistics, July, 2010, Ljubljana, Slovenia). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistics Institute. Retrieved from http://icots.net/8/cd/pdfs/contributed/ICOTS8_C156_FIDLER.pdf

  • Forbes, S. (2009). Creation and evaluation of a workplace based certifícate in official statistics for government policy makers. In C. Reading (Ed.), Next steps in statistics education (Proceedings from the 2009 IASE Satellite Conference). Durban, South Africa: International Association for Statistics Education. Retrieved from http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications/sat09/9_2.pdf

  • Forbes S, Pfannkuch M. Developing statistical thinking: Teaching and learning. In: Averill R, Harvey R, editors. Teaching secondary school mathematics and statistics: Evidence-based practice. Wellington, New Zealand: Council for Educational Research; 2009. p. 93–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galligan L. Using Valsiner. In: Goos M, Brown R, Makar K, editors. Navigating currents and charting directions (Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Brisbane, QLD: MERGA; 2008. p. 211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galligan L, Loch B, Lawrence J. Building academic numeracy in a first year nursing course using an evaluative model of program development. In: Coben D, O'Donoghue J, editors. TSG 8: Adult mathematics education: Papers from the Topic Study Group (TSG) 8, 11th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Limerick, Ireland: ALM in association with NCE-MSTL; 2010a. p. 165–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galligan L, Loch BI, McDonald C, Taylor JA. The use of tablet and related technologies in mathematics teaching. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal. 2010b;24(1):38–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey D, Thomas MOJ. Student perspectives on equation: The transition from school to university. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 2008;20(2):71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, I., Finch, S., & Maillardet, R. (2008). Statistics as breadth: The Melbourne experiment. I: Content and delivery. II: Assessment. In H. L. MacGillivray & M. A. Martin (Eds.), OZCOTS 2008 (Proceedings of the 6th Australian Conference on Teaching Statistics, pp. 143-155). Melbourne, Australia: ALTC & SSAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon S, Nicholas J. Why do statistics educators use examples to teach statistics? In: MacGillivray HL, Martin MA, editors. OZCOTS 2008 (Proceedings of the 6th Australian Conference on Teaching Statistics. Melbourne, Australia: ALTC & SSAI; 2008. p. 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah J, Stewart S, Thomas MOJ. Analysing lecturer practice: The role of orientations and goals. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2011;42(7):975–984. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2011.610008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson S, Broadbridge B. Engineering mathematics education in Australia. MSOR Connections. 2009;9(1):12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton D, Muller E, Oikkonen J, Sanchez V, Oscar A, Zizhao R. Some reasons for change in undergraduate mathematics enrolments. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2009;40(1):3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Y. Y., Kerr, S., Klymchuk, S., McHardy, J., Murphy, P., Spencer, S., … Watson, P. (2009). A comparison of teacher and lecturer perspectives on the transition from secondary to tertiary mathematics education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(7), 877-889.

    Google Scholar 

  • James A, Montelle C, Williams P. From lessons to lectures: NCEA mathematics results and first-year mathematics performance. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2008;39(8):1037–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings M. Issues in bridging between senior secondary and first year university mathematics. In: Hunter R, Bicknell B, Burgess T, editors. Crossing divides (Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference on Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Palmerston North, NZ: MERGA; 2009. p. 273–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachapova, K., & Kachapova, I. (2010). Orthogonal projection in teaching regression and financial mathematics. Journal of Statistics Education, 18(1), 1-18. Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v18n1/kachapova.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalinowski, P. (2010). Identifying misconceptions about confidence intervals. In C. Reading (Ed.), Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence based society (Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Teaching Statistics, July, 2010, Ljubljana, Slovenia). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistics Institute. Retrieved from http://icots.net/8/cd/pdfs/contributed/ICOTS8_C104_KALINOWSKI.pdf

  • Kalinowski P, Lai J, Fidler F, Cumming G. Qualitative research: An essential part of statistical cognition research. Statistics Education Research Journal. 2008;9(2):22–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, C. M. (2008). Experience, the difference: Maths attitudes and beliefs in commencing undergraduate students and pre-tertiary adult learners. In T. Maguire, N. Colleran, O. Gill, & J. O'Donoghue (Eds.), The changing face of adults mathematics education, (pp. 197-206.) Limerick, Ireland: Adults Learning Mathematics—A Research Forum & University of Limerick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klymchuk S. Counterexamples in calculus. Washington, DC: MAA; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klymchuk S, Thomas MOJ. The influence of attention on mathematical knowledge of teachers and lecturers: A comparison. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2011;42(7):1011–1020. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2011.607246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klymchuk S, Zverkova T, Gruenwald N, Sauerbier G. Increasing engineering students' awareness to environment through innovative teaching of mathematical modelling. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications. 2008;27(3):123–130. doi:10.1093/teamat/hrn007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klymchuk S, Zverkova T, Gruenwald N, Sauerbier G. University students' difficulties in solving application problems in calculus: Student perspectives. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 2010;22(2):81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyng T, Tickle L, Wood LN. Graduates' use of technical software in financial services. In: Lau M, Sugden S, editors. Applications of spreadsheets in education: The amazing power of a simple tool. Bussam, The Netherlands: Bentham Science; 2011. p. 175–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, J. (2010). Dichotomous thinking: A problem beyond NHST. In C. Reading (Ed.), Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence based society (Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Teaching Statistics, July, 2010, Ljubljana, Slovenia). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistics Institute. Retrieved from http://icots.net/8/cd/pdfs/contributed/ICOTS8_C101_LAI.pdf

  • Lerman S, Davis B. Mathematical action and structures of noticing. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim LL, Tso TY, Lin FL. Assessing science students' attitudes to mathematics: A case study on a modelling project with mathematical software. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2009;40(4):441–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loch, B. (2010). What do on campus students do with mathematics lecture screencasts at a dual-mode Australian university? Proceedings of 'Opening Windows on Mathematics and Statistics', the Continuing Excellence in the Teaching and Learning of Maths, Stats and Operational Research Conference (CETL-MSOR 2009), (pp. 43-37). Milton Keynes, United Kingdom: The Maths, Stats & OR Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loch B. Screencasting for mathematics online learning - A case study of a first year operations research course at a dual-mode Australian university. In: Juan AA, Huertas MA, Trenholm S, Steegman C, editors. Teaching mathematics online: Emergent technologies and methodologies. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; 2011. p. 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loch B, Galligan L, Hobohm C, McDonald C. Learner-centred mathematics and statistics education using netbook tablet PCs. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2011;42(7):939–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low Choy, S., & Wilson, T. (2009). How do experts think about statistics? Hints for improving undergraduate and postgraduate training. In C. Reading (Ed.), Next steps in statistics education (Proceedings from the 2009 IASE Satellite Conference). Durban, South Africa: International Association for Statistics Education. Retrieved from http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications/sat09/4_3.pdf

  • Luo K, Vemulpad S, Bilgin AA. Statistics learning: Making it easy for non-statisticians. In: MacGillivray HL, Martin MA, editors. OZCOTS 2008 (Proceedings of the 6th Australian Conference on Teaching Statistics. Melbourne, Australia: ALTC & SSAI; 2008. p. 114–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGillivray, H. (2009). Examples from an introductory course in developing probabilistic statistical thinking: Part 1 & 2. MSOR Connections, 8(1), 7-10, and 8(2), 2-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallet DG, McCue SW. Constructive development of the solutions of linear equations in introductory ordinary differential equations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2009;40(5):587–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin P. Assessment of participants in an industrial training program. In: MacGillivray HL, Martin MA, editors. OZCOTS 2008 (Proceedings of the 6th Australian Conference on Teaching Statistics. Melbourne, Australia: ALTC & SSAI; 2008. p. 136–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews KE, Adams P, Goos M. Putting it into perspective: Mathematics in the undergraduate science curriculum. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2009;40(7):891–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAndrew A. Mathematical induction, difference equations and divisibility. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2009;40(8):1013–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, C., Loch, B., & Lloyd, M. (2010). Interaction in synchronous chat tutorials facilitate learning in introductory statistics. In C. Reading (Ed.), Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence based society (Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Teaching Statistics, July, 2010, Ljubljana, Slovenia). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistics Institute. Retrieved from http://icots.net/8/cd/pdfs/contributed/ICOTS8_C179_MCDONALD.pdf

  • McPhan G, Pegg J. The option of selecting higher-level mathematics courses: Transitional tensions. In: Hunter R, Bicknell B, Burgess T, editors. Crossing divides (Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference on Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Palmerston North, NZ: MERGA; 2009. p. 363–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan A, Klymchuk S, Gruenwald N, Sauerbier G, Zverkova T. Mathematical modelling of infectious disease with biomathematics: Implications for teaching and research. In: Kaiser G, editor. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematical Modelling and Applications: ICTMA-14. Horwood: Hamburg, Germany; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, D. L., Hood, M., & Neumann, M. M. (2009). Statistics? You must be joking: The application and evaluation of humor when teaching statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 17(2). Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v17n2/neumann.html

  • Neumann, D. L., Neumann, M. M., & Hood, M. (2010). The development and evaluation of a survey that makes use of student data to teach statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 18(1), 1-19. Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v18n1/neumann.pdf

  • Oates G. Relative values of curriculum topics in undergraduate mathematics in an integrated technology environment. In: Hunter R, Bicknell B, Burgess T, editors. Crossing divides (Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference on Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Palmerston North, NZ: MERGA; 2009. p. 419–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates G. Integrated technology in undergraduate mathematics: Issues of assessment. The Electronic Journal of Mathematics and Technology. 2010;4(2):1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates G. Sustaining integrated technology in undergraduate mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2011;42(6):709–721. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2011.575238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson J, Sneddon J. Conversations about curriculum change: Mathematical thinking and team based learning in a discrete mathematics course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2011;42(7):879–889. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2011.613487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson J, Thomas MOJ, Taylor S. Reaching decisions via internal dialogue: Its role in a lecturer professional development model. In: Ubuz B, editor. Developing mathematical thinking (Proceedings of the 35th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Ankara, Turkey: PME; 2011. p. 353–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petocz A, Newberry G. On conceptual analysis as the primary qualitative approach to statistics education research in psychology. Statistics Education Research Journal. 2010;9(2):123–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petropoulou G, Potari D, Zachariades T. Inquiring mathematics teaching at the university level. In: Ubuz B, editor. Developing mathematical thinking (Proceedings of the 35th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Ankara, Turkey: PME; 2011. p. 386–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfannkuch M, Regan M, Wild C, Budgett S, Forbes S, Harraway J, Parsonage R. Inference and the introductory statistics course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2011;42(7):903–913. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2011.604732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfannkuch, M., Regan, M., Wild, C., & Horton, N. J. (2008). Telling data stories: Essential dialogues for comparative reasoning. Journal of Statistics Education, 18(1), 1-38. Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v18n1/pfannkuch.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce R, Stacey K, Steinle V, Widjaja W. Understanding decimal numbers: A foundation for correct calculations. International Journal for Nursing Education Scholarship. 2008;5(1):1–15. doi:10.2202/1548-923X.1439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plank M, James A, Hannah J. Group by subject or by ability? Tertiary mathematics for engineering students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2011;42(7):857–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruzek, R. M., & Helmreich, J. E. (2009). Enhancing dependent sample analyses with graphics. Journal of Statistics Education, 17(1). Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v17n1/helmreich.html

  • Pytlak, M., Swoboda, E., & Rowland, T. (2011). Proceedings of the Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. University of Rzeszów, Poland: European Society in Mathematics Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid A, Abrandt Dahlgren M, Dahlgren LO, Petocz P. From expert student to novice professional. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, A., Dahlgren, L. O., Dahlgren, M. A., & Petocz, P. (2010). Applying a model of professional learning to case studies in statistics education. In C. Reading (Ed.), Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence based society (Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Teaching Statistics, July, 2010, Ljubljana, Slovenia). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistics Institute. Retrieved from http://icots.net/8/cd/pdfs/invited/ICOTS8_6G2_REID.pdf

  • Reid A, Petocz P. A tertiary curriculum for future professionals. In: Nygaard C, Holtham C, editors. Understanding learning-centred higher education. Copenhagen, Denmark: CBS Press; 2008. p. 31–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J., & Reading, C. (2010). Developing a framework for reasoning about explained and unexplained variation. In C. Reading (Ed.), Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence based society (Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Teaching Statistics, July, 2010, Ljubljana, Slovenia). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistics Institute. Retrieved from http://icots.net/8/cd/pdfs/contributed/ICOTS8_C169_REID.pdf

  • Richardson A. Language support for statistics learners. In: MacGillivray HL, Martin MA, editors. OZCOTS 2008 (Proceedings of the 6th Australian Conference on Teaching Statistics. Melbourne, Australia: ALTC & SSAI; 2008. p. 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein H. A national strategy for mathematical sciences in Australia. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rylands LJ, Coady C. Performance of students with weak mathematics in first-year mathematics and science. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2009;40(6):741–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. M., Ryan, P., Carlin, J. B., Gurrin, L., & Marschner, I. (2009). Training a new generation of biostatisticians: A successful consortium model. Journal of Statistics Education, 17(2). Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v17n2/simpson.pdf

  • Sowey, E., & Petocz, P. (2010). Enriching statistics courses with statistical diversions. In C. Reading (Ed.), Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence based society (Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Teaching Statistics, July, 2010, Ljubljana, Slovenia). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistics Institute. Retrieved from http://icots.net/8/cd/pdfs/invited/ICOTS8_4D3_SOWEY.pdf

  • Stewart, S. (2008). Understanding linear algebra concepts through the embodied, symbolic and formal worlds of mathematical thinking. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).The University of Auckland, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart S. Understanding linear algebra concepts through APOS and the three worlds of mathematical thinking theories. In: Tzekaki M, Kaldrimidou M, Sakonidis H, editors. In search of theories in mathematics education (Proceedings of the 33rd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Thessaloniki, Greece: PME; 2009. p. 169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall D. Building theories: The three worlds of mathematics. For The Learning of Mathematics. 2004;24(1):29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JA. Assessment in first year university: A model to manage transition. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. 2008;5(1):19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas J, Muchatuta M, Wood LN. Mathematical sciences in Australia. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2009;40(1):17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas MOJ, Kensington-Miller B, Bartholomew H, Barton B, Paterson J, Yoon C. Mathematics undergraduate teaching: Perspectives and interactions. Proceedings of the Conference of the New Zealand Association for Research in Education. Auckland, New Zealand: NZARE; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas MOJ, Stewart S. Eigenvalues and eigenvectors: Embodied, symbolic and formal thinking. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 2011;23(3):275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonkes EJ, Isaac PS, Scharaschkin V. Assessment of an innovative system of lecture notes in first-year mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2009;40(4):495–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viirman O. Discursive practices of two university teachers on the concept of 'linear transformation'. In: Ubuz B, editor. Developing mathematical thinking (Proceedings of the 35th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Ankara, Turkey: PME; 2011. p. 313–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson R, Bulmer M. Joining the DOTS: Directed online tutorials for statistics. In: MacGillivray HL, Martin MA, editors. OZCOTS 2008 (Proceedings of the 6th Australian Conference on Teaching Statistics. Melbourne, Australia: ALTC & SSAI; 2008. p. 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiwatanapataphee B, Noinang S, Wu YH, Nuntadilok B. An integrated Powerpoint- Maple based teaching-learning model for multivariate integral calculus. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. 2010;5(1):5–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood G, Petocz P. One in a million: An alternative transformation of the first-year statistics course. Asian Social Science. 2008;4(3):43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L. N. (2008). University learners of mathematics. In H. Forgasz, A. Barkatsas, A. Bishop, B. Clarke, S. Keast, W-T. Seah, & P. Sullivan (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2004-2007 (pp. 73-97). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood LN. Graduate capabilities: putting mathematics into context. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2010;41(2):189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood LN. Practice and conceptions: Communicating mathematics in the workplace. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 2011;79(1):doi:10.1007/s10649-011-9340-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L. N., Mather, G., Petocz, P., Reid, A., Engelbrecht, J., Harding, A., … Perrett, G. (2011). University students' views of the role of mathematics in their future. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s10763-110-9279-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood LN, Solomonides I. Different disciplines, different transitions. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 2008;20(2):117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, L. N., Vu, T., Bower, M., Brown, N., Skalicky, J., Donovan, D., … Bloom, W. (2011). Professional development for teaching in higher education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(7), 997-1009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worsley S. The big ideas in two large first level courses of undergraduate mathematics. In: Clark J, Kissane B, Mousley J, Spencer T, Thornton S, editors. Mathematics: Traditions and [new] practices (Proceedings of the 34th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia and the 23rd biennial conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers, Alice Springs. Adelaide, SA: AAMT & MERGA; 2011. p. 839–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon C, Dreyfus T, Thomas MOJ. How high is the tramping track? Mathematising and applying in a calculus model-eliciting activity. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 2010;22(1):147–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon C, Kensington-Miller M, Sneddon J, Bartholomew H. It's not the done thing: Social norms governing students' passive behaviour in undergraduate mathematics lectures. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2011. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2011.573877.

  • Yoon C, Sneddon J. Student perceptions of effective use of tablet PC recorded lectures in undergraduate mathematics courses. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2011;42(4):425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barton, B., Goos, M., Wood, L., Miskovich, A. (2012). Growth And New Directions? Research In Tertiary Mathematical Science Education. In: Perry, B., Lowrie, T., Logan, T., MacDonald, A., Greenlees, J. (eds) Research in Mathematics Education in Australasia 2008–2011. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-970-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships