Abstract
Understanding how people learn science demands consideration of a variety of factors such as interests, opportunities, and interactions that potentially influence learning across the lifespan and throughout multiple contexts (see also Anderson chapter 2). Facilitating such a process, through different settings and different situations, is not really the sole responsibility of an individual or single organization; rather, it likely involves a conglomeration of entities affording connections across and between ideas and interests, past and present (see also Rahm, chapter 7). In some cases, collaborations span several organizations that explicitly support such learning activities across different environments (see Ash & Lombana, chapter 3), including both formal and informal learning environments. In these cases, it becomes critical to understand how (and even whether) different institutions can actually work together to achieve a shared goal of science teaching and learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ash D, Brown C, Kluger-Bell B, Hunter L. Creating hybrid communities using inquiry as professional development for college science faculty. Journal of College Science Teaching. 2009;38(6):68–76.
Gall MD, Borg WR, Gall JP. Educational research: An introduction. 6th ed. White Plains, NY: Longman Publishers; 1996.
Hein GE. The role of museums in society: Education and social action. Curator. 2005;48(4):357–363.
Institute of Museum and Library Services. Charting the landscape, mapping new paths: Museums, libraries and K-12 learning. Washington, DC: Author; 2005.
Isaac S, Michael W. Handbook in research and evaluation. 3rd ed. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Services; 1997.
Lave J. Situated learning in communities of practice. In: Resnick L, Levine J, Teasley S, editors. Perspectives of socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1991. p. 63–82.
Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
Lofland J, Lofland LH. Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing; 1995.
Council NR. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1996.
Ogawa R, Crain R, Loomis M, Ball T. CHAT-IT: Toward conceptualizing learning in the context of formal organizations. Educational Researcher. 2008;37(2):83–95.
Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990.
Wenger E. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
Yin RK. Case study research: Designs and methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1994.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kisiel, J. (2012). Reframing Collaborations with Informal Science Institutions. In: Ash, D., Rahm, J., Melber, L.M. (eds) Putting Theory into Practice. New Directions in Mathematics and Science Education, vol 25. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-964-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-964-0_6
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-964-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)