Abstract
This chapter advocates for the study of new research methods that allow researchers a more unbounded-responsive approach to qualitative – interpretivist studies of visitor learning in informal settings. The focus is on the utility and merits of research methods that evolve during the course of interpretive research studies; such methods have considerable potential for researchers to more deeply understand emergent experiential visitor learning in informal contexts. Many research studies, typically situated within a positivist paradigm, often establish methods and hold them fixed throughout data collection. This static approach to data collection has historically been seen a virtue, and is celebrated for the scientific rigor it brings to research design. This chapter looks critically at traditional positivist research, arguing that a repetitive, dialectic, hermeneutici approach may be more effective when research questions seek understanding of the nature of learning in informal settings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson CW, Lee O. Will students take advantage of opportunities for meaningful science learning? Phi Delta Kappan. 1997;78(9):720–724.
Anderson D. The development of science concepts emergent from science museum and post- visit activity experiences: Students’ construction of knowledge. Brisbane, Australia: Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Queensland University of Technology; 1999.
Anderson D. (2008). Metacognition and reflective inquiry, final grant report. Unpublished report. Ottawa, Canada: Social Sciences Research Humanities Council.
Anderson D, Ellenbogen KM. Learning science in informal contexts—Epistemological perspectives and paradigms. In: Fraser BJ, Tobin K, McRobbie C, editors. Second international handbook of science education. New York, NY: Springer; 2012. p. 1179–1187.
Anderson D, Nashon S. Predators of knowledge construction: Interpreting students’ metacognition in an amusement park physics program. Science Education. 2007;91(2):298–320.
Anderson, D., Storksdieck, M., & Spock, M. (2007). The long-term impacts of museum experiences. In J. Falk, L. Dierking, & S. Foutz (Eds.), In principle, in practice — New perspectives on museums as learning institutions (pp. 197–215). Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Pres.
Anderson D, Nashon SM, Thomas GP. Social barriers to engaging in meaningful learning in biology field trip group work. Science Education. 2009a;93(3):511–534.
Anderson D, Thomas GP, Nashon SM. Evolution of research methods for probing and understanding metacognition. Research in Science Education. 2009b;39(2):181–195.
Baird JR, Mitchell IJ. Improving the quality of teaching and learning: An Australian case study – The PEEL Project. Melbourne, Australia: Monash University; 1987.
Borun M, Chambers M, Cleghorn A. Families are learning in science museums. Curator. 1996;39(2):124–138.
Brewer MB, Collins BE. Models of knowing. In: Brewer MB, Collins BE, editors. Scientific enquiry and the social sciences. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1981. p. 11–17.
Falk JH, Dierking LD. Learning from museums. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press; 2000.
Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Fourth generation evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1989.
Hein GE. Learning in the museum. London, England: Routledge; 1998.
McRobbie CJ, Tobin KG. Restraints to reform: The congruence of teacher and student actions in a chemistry classroom. Journal of research in Science Teaching. 1995;32(4):373–385.
Nielson W, Nashon S, Anderson D. Metacognitive engagement during field-trip experiences: A case study of students in an amusement park physics program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2009;46(3):265–288.
Nelson TO, Narens L. Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. 1990;26:125–141.
Popkewitz T. Paradigms and ideologies in educational research. London: The Falmer Press; 1984.
Thomas GP. Student restraints to reform: Conceptual change issues in enhancing students’ learning processes. Research in Science Education. 1999;19(1):89–109.
Thomas GP, Anderson D, Nashon SM. Development and validity of an instrument designed to investigate elements of science students’ metacognition, self-efficacy and learning processes: The SEMLI-S. International Journal of Science Education. 2008;30(13):1701–1724.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Anderson, D. (2012). A Reflective Hermeneutic Approach to Research Methods Investigating Visitor Learning. In: Ash, D., Rahm, J., Melber, L.M. (eds) Putting Theory into Practice. New Directions in Mathematics and Science Education, vol 25. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-964-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-964-0_2
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-964-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)