Skip to main content

Selecting History

What Elementary Educators Say about Their Social Studies Textbook

  • Chapter
  • 969 Accesses

Part of the book series: Constructing Knowledge ((CKCS,volume 2))

Abstract

Education is not neutral. As McLaren (1989) serves to remind us, schools are contested spaces where social, economic, and curricular inequities exist, often to the detriment of student learning. The idealistic notion of education for education’s sake runs counter to a more insidious, more layered educational construct that promotes the prominent while dismissing the marginalized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen VS. An analysis of textbooks relative to the treatment of Black Americans. Journal of Negro Education. 1971;49(2):140–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson B. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London, England: Verso; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anyon J. Elementary social studies textbooks and legitimating knowledge. Theory and Research in Social Education. 1979;6(3):40–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin P, Baldwin D. The portrayal of women in classroom textbooks. Canadian Social Studies. 1992;26(3):110–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks JA. Multicultural education: Historical development, dimension, and practice. In: Banks JA, Banks CAM, editors. The handbook of multicultural education. New York, NY: Macmillan; 1995. p. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks JA. A content analysis of the Black American in textbooks. Social Education. 1969;33(8):954–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg RL. The invisible obstacle to educational equality: Gender bias in textbooks. Prospects: Quarterly Review of Comparative Education. 2008;38(3):345–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown AL, Brown KD. Strange fruit indeed: Interrogating contemporary textbook representations of racial violence toward African Americans. Teachers College Record. 2010;112(1):31–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Building a Nation. (2005). Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell-Wood N, Mitten L. I is not for Indian: The portrayal of Native Americans in books for young people. Multicultural Review. 1992;1(2):26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson D. Legitimation and delegitimation: American history textbooks and the Cold War. In: DeCastell S, Luke A, Luke C, editors. Language authority and criticism: Readings on the school textbook. Philadelphia, PA: The Palmer Press; 1989. p. 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commeyras M, Alverman DE. Messages that high school world history textbooks convey. Social Studies. 1994;85(6):268–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz BC. Stereotypes of Latin Americans perpetuated in secondary school history textbooks. Latino Studies Journal. 1994;1(1):51–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVoogd G. Critical comprehension of social studies texts. RHI: Promoting Active Citizenship. 2007;7(1):21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhand, H. (1998). Bias in social studies textbooks: New research findings. The History and Social Science Teacher, 24(1), 23, 25-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finchum M. “I” is for Indian?: Dealing with stereotypes in the classroom. Social Studies and the Young Learner. 2006;18(4):4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster SJ. The struggle for American identity: Treatment of ethnic groups in United States history textbooks. History of Education. 1999;28(3):251–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freebody P, Luke A, Glibert P. Reading positions and practices in the classroom. Curriculum Inquiry. 1991;21(4):435–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon P. Democracy’s untold story: What world history textbooks neglect. Sacramento, CA: State Department of Education, Bureau of Adult Education; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannangelo, D. M., & Kaplan, M. B. (1992). An analysis and critique of selected social studies textbooks. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED353173).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux H. Critical literacy and student experience: Donald Graves’ approach to literacy. Language Arts. 1987;64(2):175–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Growth of a Nation. (2005). Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julian, N. N. (1979). Treatment of women in United States history textbooks. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED178371).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemp R, McBride B, Ogle D. Building literacy in social studies: Strategies for improving comprehension and critical thinking. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine LW. The opening of the American mind: Canons, culture, and history. Boston, MA: Beacon Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewen J. Lies my teacher told me: Everything your American history textbook got wrong. New York, NY: Touchtone; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke A, Freebody P. The social practices of reading. In: Muspratt S, Luke A, Freebody P, editors. Constructing critical literacies: Teaching and learning textual practice. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton; 1997. p. 185–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren P. Life in schools. New York: Longman, Inc.; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS). (2010). National curriculum standards for social studies: A framework for teaching, learning, and assessment. Silver Spring, MD: NCSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson MR. Merl R. Eppse and studies of Blacks in American history textbooks. International Journal of Social Education. 1988;3(3):84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa M. Building multiple historical perspectives: An investigation of how middle school students are influenced by different perspectives. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association. WA: Seattle; 2001, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JC. Textbooks: Guardians of nationalism. Education. 1981;102(1):37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riis J. How the other half lives. New York, NY: Dover Inc.; 1901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanowski MH. Problems of bias in history textbooks. Social Education. 1996;60(3):170–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez TR. The depiction of Native Americans in recent (1991-2004) secondary American history textbooks: How far have we come? Equity & Excellence in Education. 2007;40(4):311–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soares LB, Wood K. A critical literacy perspective for teaching and learning social studies. The Reading Teacher. 2010;63(6):486–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Sledright B. In search of America’s past: Learning to read history in elementary school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills JS. Missing in interaction: Diversity, narrative, and critical multicultural social studies. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association. LA: New Orleans; 2000, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wineburg S, Martin D. Reading and rewriting history. Educational Leadership. 2004;62(1):42–45.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lintner, T., Macphee, D. (2012). Selecting History. In: Hickman, H., Porfilio, B.J. (eds) The New Politics of the Textbook. Constructing Knowledge, vol 2. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-930-5_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships