Skip to main content

A Visualisation Tool for Experiential Learning in Environmental Science

Using Football Fields, Agricultural Fields and Waterways to Illustrate the Implication of Different Water Allocation Decisions

  • Chapter
Biology Education for Social and Sustainable Development
  • 1123 Accesses

Abstract

Environmental education challenges educators to provide students with activities that cover complex societal issues, enhance critical thinking and to promote interdisciplinary and holistic learning. A further challenge is to convey this information so that it provides a solid foundation for participatory decision making. For example, effective management of water resources requires consideration of the social, economic and environmental consequences of various water allocation decisions together with an understanding of the possible conflicts that arise from these decisions, particular under scenarios of limited water supply. Well designed visualisation tools can enhance teaching and understanding of difficult concepts. For example, they can be designed to allow students to participate in hypothetical decision making and to visualise the potential implications of their decisions under a range of scenarios. A review of the published literature revealed that several visualisation tools have been developed for use in science education, but few provide the option for students to participate in integrated environmental decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amershi, S., Arksey, N., Carenini, G., Conati, C., Mackworth, A., Maclaren, H. & Poole, D. (2005) Fostering student learning and motivation: an interactive educational tool for AI. Tech. Rep. TR-2005-06, University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich C (2004) Simulations and the future of learning: An innovative (and perhaps revolutionary) approach to e-learning. Pfeiffer Publishing, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker TR, White SH (2003) The effects of GIS. on student’s attitudes, self-efficacy, and achievement in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Geography 102:243–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball J, Capanni N, Watt S (2007) Virtual reality for mutual understanding in Landscape planning. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences 2(2):78–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop ID, Rohrmann B (2003) Subjective responses to computer simulations of urban environments - a comparison. Landscape and Urban Planning 65:261–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell S (2001) Landscape pattern, perception and visualisation in the visual management of forests. Landscape and Urban Planning 54:201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boese, M.J., Sheng, H. & Salam, M.A. (2009) Evaluating the use of 3D visualisation technology in geology education. AMCIS 2009 Proceedings, Paper 7. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2009/7 accessed 28/02/2011.

  • Bowe, M., Jensen, D., Feland, J. & Self, B. (2000) When multimedia doesn’t work: an assessment of visualisation modules for learning enhancement in mechanics. Institute for Information Technology Applications (IITA) research publication 3: education series. June 2000 - HQ USAFA/DFPS, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunch RL, Lloyd RE (2006) The cognitive load of geographic information. The Professional Geographer 58(2):209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burch S, Sheppard RSJ, Shaw A, Flanders D (2010) Planning for Climate Change in a flood-prone community: municipal barriers to policy action and the use of visualizations as decision-support tools. Journal of Flood Risk Management 3:126–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen RL (1991) Justice and negotiation. Research in Negotiation in Organizations 3:259–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Crews T, Biswas G, Goldman S, Bransford J (1997) Anchored Interactive Learning Environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 8(2):46–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman BJ, D’Amico LM (1994) Which way will the wind blow? Networked computer tools for studying the weather. Paper presented at the conference on Educational Multimedia and Telecommunications - Vancouver, B.C, pp 209–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, P. (2000) Water conflict chronology. Internet electronic text. http://worldwater.org/conflict.html accessed 25/02/2011.

  • Gopalakrishnan C, Levy J, Li KW, Hipel KW (2005) Water allocation among multiple stakeholders: conflict analysis of the Waiahole water project, Hawaii. Water Resources Development 21(2):283–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpine SM (2004) Introducing molecular visualization to primary schools in California: the STArt! teaching science through art program. Journal of Chemical Education 81(10):1431–1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrower M, MacEachren A, Griffin AL (2000) Developing a geographic visualization tool to support earth science learning. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 27(4):279–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He C (2003) Integration of geographic information systems and simulation model for watershed management. Environmental Modelling & Software The Modelling of Hydrologic Systems 18(8–9):809–813

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks D (1996) Envisioning the future. Environmental Education Research 2(1):101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlimann AC (2009) Responding to environmental challenges: an initial assessment of higher education curricula needs by Australian planning professionals. Environmental Education Research 15(6):643–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski P (2009) Towards participatory geographic information systems for community-based environmental decision making. Journal of Environmental Management 90:1966–1971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalawsky RS (1993) The Science of Virtual Reality and Virtual Environments Addison-Wesley. Wokingham, Berks, p 432

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H.S. (2005) Learning with computer modelling software in a high school chemistry class: a study of conceptual growth and transfer. In: C.-K Looi et.al (eds.), Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Towards Sustainable and Scalable Educational Innovations Informed by the Learning Sciences:Sharing Good Practices of Research, Expermentation and Innovation IOS Press Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Larson, K.L. & Edsall, R.M (2010) The impact of visual information on perceptions of water resource problems and management alternatives. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 53(3):335–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Looi, C., Jonassen, D.H., & Ikeda, M. (2005) Towards Sustainable and Scalable Educational Innovation Informed by the Learning Sciences, pp. 740-743. IOS Press, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, J.G. & Coppola, R. (1996) Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment (GLOBE): an international environmental science research and science education program. Proceedings of Eco-Informa '96, 10, 503-507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin MC, Chang CY (2005) The development of a 3D visualisation tool on the topic of cold front. In: Looi C, Jonassen DH, Ikeda M (eds) Towards Sustainable and Scalable Educational Innovations Informed by the Learning Sciences. IOS Press, Netherlands, pp 740–743

    Google Scholar 

  • Mak, A., Lai, P., Kwong, R. & Leung, S. (2005) To much or too little: visual consideration of public engagement tools in environmental impact assessment. In: S. Bres & R. Laurini (eds). VISUAL 2005, lecture notes in computer science. LNCS 3736, pp. 189-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus RR, Onjala J (2008) Exit the state: decentralization and the need for local social, political, and economic considerations in water resource allocation in Madagascar and Kenya. Journal of Human Development 9(1):23–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Means B (1998) Melding authentic science, technology, and inquiry-based teaching: Experiences of the GLOBE program. Journal of Science Education and Technology 7(1):97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molle F, Berkoff J (2007) River basin development and management. In: Molden D (ed) Water for food - Water for life, Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. EarthScan, London, pp 585–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Molle F, Berkoff J (2009) Cities vs. agriculture: a review of intersectoral water re-allocation. Natural Resources Forum 33:6–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandalal KD, Hipel KW (2007) Strategic decision support for resolving conflict over water sharing among countries along the Syr Darya River in the Aral Sea Basin. Journal of Water Resources Planning & Management 133(4):289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newhouse, C.P. (2002) The impact of ICT on learning and teaching. A literature review for the Department of Education, Western Australia.Environment and Urban System, 29:255-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson-Cole S (2005) Representing climate change futures: a critique on the use of images for visual communication. Computers, Environment and Urban System 29:255–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill S, Nicholson-Cole S (2009) Fear won’t do it: promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication 30(3):355–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orland, B. (1994) Smart forest: a 3-D interactive forest visualisation and analysis system. Proceedings of Decision Support - 2001. Combined events of the 17th Annual Geographic Information Seminar and the Resource Technology '94 symposium, Toronto: pp. 181-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R.D. (2002) Learning science through collaborative visualization over the internet. Nobel Symposium: Virtual museums and oublic understanding of science and culture, May 26-29, 2002, Stockholm: Sweden (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit C, Nelson A, Cartwright W (2004) Using on-line geographical visualisation tools to improve land use decision-making with a bottom-up community participatory approach. In: van Leeuwen JP, Timmermans HJP (eds) 53-68. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrmann B, Bishop I (2002) Subjective responses to computer simulations of urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 22:319–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland M (2005) A framework for resolving the transboundary water allocation conflict conundrum. Ground Water 43(5):700–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroth O, Wissen U, Schmid WA (2006) Developing New Images of Rurality - Interactive 3D Visualizations for Participative Landscape Planning Workshops in the Entlebuch UNESCO Biosphere Reserve. DISP 166(3):26–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman C, Syme GJ, Gilchrist R (1994) The role of values and ethical principles in judgements of environmental dilemmas. Journal of Social Issues 50(3):105–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard SR (2005) Landscape visualisation and climate change: the potential for influencing perceptions and behaviour. Environmental Science & Policy 8:637–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard K, Mann S, Smith N, Deaker L (2009) Benchmarking the environmental values and attitudes of students in New Zealand’s post-compulsory education. Environmental Education Research 15(5):571–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, S.R., Shaw, A., Flanders, D. & Burch, S. (2008) Can visualisation save the world? - Lessons for landscape architects from visualizing local climate change. In Procs. Digital Design in Landscape Architecture 2008, 9th International Conference on IT in Landscape Architecture. Dessau/Bernburg, Germany: Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, May 29-31 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syme, G.J. & Nancarrow, B.E. (2006) Perceptions of fairness and social justice in the allocation of water resources in Australia. Perth, CSIRO, Division of Water Resources, Consultancy Report 92/38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syme GJ, Nancarrow BE (2006b) Achieving sustainability and fairness in water reform. Water International 31(1):23–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syme GJ, Nancarrow BE, McCreddin JA (1999) Defining the components of fairness in the allocation of water to environmental and human uses. Journal of Environmental Management 57:51–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan P (2006) Legislating for Adequate Public Participation in Allocating Water in Australia. Water International 31(4):455–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) (2008) Education for sustainable development. United Nations Decade (2005-2014). UNESCO, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, A., Block, J., Graymore, M.L.M., Vamplew, P., O’Toole, K., McRae-Williams, P. & Mitchell, B. (In Press) WINDSCREEN: A tool for assessing community water allocation trade-offs?

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis A, Laurenson L (2004) Environment, resource sustainability and sustainable behaviour: exploring perceptions of students in south-west Victoria. Asian Journal of Biology Education 2:39–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Wals AE, Jickling B (2002) Sustainability in higher education: from doublethink and newspeak to critical thinking and meaningful learning. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 3(3):221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegerich K (2007) A critical review of the concept of equity to support water allocation at various scales in the Amu Darya basin. Irrigation Drainage Systems 21:185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf AT (1999) Criteria for equitable allocations: the heart of international water conflict. Natural Resources Forum 23:3–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf AT, Natharius JA, Danielson JJ, Ward BS, Pender JK (1999) International river basins of the world. International Journal of Water Resources Development 14(4):387–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wurbs RA (2004) Water allocation systems in Texas. Water Resources Development 20(2):229–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusoff MF, Zulkifli AN, Mohamed NF (2010) Virtual environment as aids in persuading users in learning process. Proceedings of Regional Conference on Knowledge Integration in ICT, Putrajaya, Malaysia, June 1:2010

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wallis, A., Graymore, M., Matthews, T., Byrne, S. (2012). A Visualisation Tool for Experiential Learning in Environmental Science. In: Kim, M., Diong, C.H. (eds) Biology Education for Social and Sustainable Development. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-927-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships