Skip to main content
  • 1060 Accesses

Abstract

This research is a preliminary model/theory building based on Pandit’s process of building grounded theory from case studies and is qualitative in nature. The purpose of the study is to describe, analyze, and categorize what makes an excellent science teacher. Science teachers who were recipients of Teaching Excellence Award in Biology, Chemistry and Physics (in the Philippines) were selected using purposive sampling. Multiple methods of data collection were used, including, interviews, classroom observations and students’ evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baiocco SA, DeWaters JN. Successful College Teaching- Problem Solving Strategies of Distinguished Professors. USA: A Viacom Company; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balsicas, N., (2005). Teaching Practices of the National Science Teacher Awardees. Unpublished Dissertation. University of the Philippines, Quezon City. M

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair TR. Emerging Patterns of Teaching. London: Merill Publishing Company; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batomalaque, http://www.criced.tsukuba.ac.jp/pdf/09

  • Borgatti. S. (2005). Introduction to grounded theory. RetrievedDecember, 2007, from http://www.analytictech.com

  • Charmaz K. Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, editors. Strategies of qualitative inquiry. London: Sage; 2003. p. 265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin J, Strauss A. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology. 1990;13:3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank R, Bainer SL, Metcalf K. The Act of Teaching. Boston: Mcgraw- Hill College; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith M, Thorpe R, Lowe A. Management research: An introduction. London: Sage; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review. 1989;14:532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandit, N. R. (1996). The creation of a theory. A recent application of the grounded theory method. The Qualitative Report, 2(4). Retrieved September 11, 2007, from http://www.nova.edu.sss/QR/QR2-4/pandit.htmlSalandanan, G. (2000). Stauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA:Sage

  • Wiles J, Bondi J. Curriculum Development. USA: McMillan Publishing Co; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin R. Case study research: Design and Methods. London: Sage; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paez-Quinto, M. (2012). What Makes a Science Teacher Excellent. In: Kim, M., Diong, C.H. (eds) Biology Education for Social and Sustainable Development. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-927-5_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships