Skip to main content

The Nature of Video Studies in Science Education

Analysis of Teaching & Learning Processes

  • Chapter
Science Education Research and Practice in Europe

Part of the book series: Cultural Perpectives in Science Education ((CHPS,volume 5))

Abstract

The use of video recordings as data in research studies in science education began in the 1970s. After almost thirty years, this use is widespread among researchers; video is included in regular research practice. However as any “new instrument”, video has modified researchers’ practice to the extent that the nature of information given to researchers is different from that of written data, direct observation and even audio recordings. In this chapter, our aim is mainly to give insight into the characteristics of video data and the complex nature of video. In part one we present specific characteristics, mainly the physical ones, then in part two we discuss to what extent one main characteristic of the video is its analogy with the recorded part of the situation in terms of events kept or transformed in the analyses, and in part three we present an actual research study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ash D. Using video data to capture discontinuous science meaning making in non school settings. In: Goldman R, Pea R, Barron B, Derry S, editors. Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007. p. 207–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash D. Thematic continuities: talking and thinking about adaptation in a socially complex classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2008;45(1):1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron B. Video as a tool to advance understanding of learning and development in peer, family and other informal learning contexts. In: Goldman R, Pea R, Barron B, Derry S, editors. Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007. p. 159–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau G. Théorie des situations didactiques. Grenoble: La pensée sauvage; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner JS. The Narrative Construction of Reality. Critical Inquiry. 1991;18(1):1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner JS. The culture of education. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevallard Y. La transposition didactique. 2nd ed. Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke D, Keitel C, Shimizu Y, editors. Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries: the insider’s perspective. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb P, Gresalfi M, Hodge LL. A design research perspective on the identities that students are developing in mathematics classrooms. In: Schwarz B, Dreyfus T, Hershkovitz R, editors. Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction. New York: Routledge; 2009. p. 223–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, D., Khanfour-Armalé, R., Badreddine, Z., Malkoun, L., & Seck, M. (2009). Méthodologie de mise au point d’un consensus entre chercheurs: le cas du thème, 1er colloque international de l’ARCD Où va la didactique comparée. Université de Genève.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derry SJ, Pea RD, Barron B, Engle RA, Erickson F, Goldman R, et al. Conducting Video Research in the Learning Sciences: Guidance on Selection, Analysis, Technology, and Ethics. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2010;19(1):3–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Descombes V. Les institutions du sens. Paris: Minuit; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle RA. Framing interactions to foster generative learning: a situative explanation of transfer in a community of learners classroom. The journal of the learning sciences. 2006;15(4):451–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle RA, Conant FR, Greeno JG. Progressive refinement of hypotheses in video-supported research. In: Goldman R, Pea R, Barron B, Derry SJ, editors. Video research in the learning sciences. Mawah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007. p. 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2000). The influence of an historically oriented course on students’ content knowledge in optics evaluated by means of facets-schemes analysis. American Journal of Physics, 68 (Supplement)(7), S3–S15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman-Segall, R. (1998). Points of viewing children’s thinking. Mahaw, New jersey: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman R, Pea R, Barron B, Derry S. Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman S, McDermott R. Staying the course with video analysis. In: Goldman R, Pea R, Barron B, Derry S, editors. Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007. p. 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1983/2005). Representing an Intervening. Cambridge: University Press Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., Gallimore, J. H. R., Garnier, H., Bogard, K., Hollingsworth, G. H., Jacobs, J., Chui, A. M.-Y., Wearne, D., Smith, M., Kersting, N., Manaster, A., Tseng, E., Etterbeek, W., Manaster, C., Gonzales, P., & Stigler, J. (2003). Teaching Mathematics in Seven Countries. Results from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study: National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B. Reassembling the Social- An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke JL. The long and the short of it: comments on multiple timescale studies of human activities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2001;10(1&2):17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke JL, Sabelli NH. Complex Systems and Educational Change: Towards a new research agenda. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2008;40(1):118–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligozat, F. (2008). Un point de vue de didactique comparée sur la classe de mathématiques. Unpublished doctorate, Université de Genève et université de Provence.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacWhinney B. A transcript-video database for collaborative commentary in the learning sciences. In: Goldman R, Pea R, Barron B, Derry S, editors. Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007. p. 537–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkoun, L. (2007). De la caractérisation des pratiques de classes de physique à leur relation aux performances des élèves: étude de cas en France et au Liban. Unpublished Doctorate, Université Lyon 2 / Université libanaise, Lyon/Beyrouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkoun, L., & Tiberghien, A. (2008). Objets de savoir et processus scientifiques en jeu dans les productions discursives en classe de physique de lycée. In L. Filliettaz & M.-L. Schubauer-Leoni (Eds.), Processus interactionnels et situations éducatives, coll. Raisons éducatives (pp. 67–88). Bruxelles: De Boeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlot, C. (2008). Caractérisation des transactions didactiques : Deux études de cas en découverte du monde vivant au cycle II de l’école élémentaire. Doctorat en sciences de l’éducation, Université Rennes 2, Rennes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M., & Bateson, G. (1976) For God’s Sake, Margaret: A Conversation with Gregory Bateson and Margaret Mead, edited by Stewart Brand. CoEvolution Quarterly (Summer), pp. 32–44. Reprinted in part as Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson on the Use of the Camera in Anthropology. Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication, Vol. 4, no. 2, (Winter 1977), pp. 78–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercier A, Schauber-Leoni ML, Sensevy G. Vers une didactique comparée. Revue Française de Pédagogie. 2002;141:5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller K, Zhou X. Learning from classroom video: what makes it compelling and what makes it hard. In: Goldman R, Pea R, Barron B, Derry S, editors. Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007. p. 321–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minstrell J. Facets of students’ knowledge and relevant instruction. In: Duit R, Goldberg F, Niedderer H, editors. Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies. Kiel: IPN; 1992. p. 110–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondada L. Video Recording as the Reflexive Preservation and Configuration of Phenomenal Features for Analysis. In: Knoblauch H, Raab J, Soeffner H-G, Schnettler B, editors. Video Analysis. Bern: Lang; 2006. p. 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petri J, Niedderer H. A Learning pathway in high-school level quantum atomic physics. International Journal of Science Education. 1998;20(8):1075–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powel AB, Francisco JM, Maher CA. An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. The journal of mathematical behavior. 2003;22:405–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quéré L. L’environnement comme partenaire. In: Barbier J-M, Durand M, editors. Sujets, activités, environnements. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; 2006. p. 6–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K. J., Druker, S. L., Garnier, H. E., Lemmens, M., Chen, C., Kawanaka, T., Rasmussen, D., Trubacova, S., Warvi, D., Okamoto, Y., Gonzales, P., Stigler, J., & Gallimore, R. (2006). Teaching Science in Five Countries: Results From the TIMSS 1999 Video Study Statistical Analysis Report (NCES 2006–011). Washington: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth W-M, Tobin KG, Ritchie SM. Time and temporality as mediators of science learning. Science Education. 2008;92(1):115–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, T., & Prenzel, M. (2006). Stability of teaching patterns in physics instruction: findings from a video study. Learning and Instruction, 228–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sensevy, G., Mercier, A., Schubauer-Leoni, M-L., Ligozat, F. Perrot, G (2005). An attempt to model the teacher’s action in mathematics, Educational Studies in mathematics, 59(1), 153–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sensevy, G. (2007). Des catégories pour décrire et comprendre l’action didactique. In G. Sensevy & A. Mercier (Eds.), Agir ensemble : Eléments de théorisation de l’action conjointe du professeur et des élèves (pp. 13–49). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes (PUR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sensevy G, Tiberghien A, Santini J, Laubé S, Griggs P. Modelling, an epistemological approach: cases studies and implications for science teaching. Science Education. 2008;92(3):424–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sensevy, G. (2011a). Le sens du savoir. Éléments pour une théorie de l’action conjointe en didactique. Bruxelles: de Boeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sensevy, G. (2011b) Overcoming fragmentation: towards a joint action theory in didactics. In Hudson, B. & Meyer, M. A. (Eds.) Beyond Fragmentation: Didactics, Learning, and Teaching (pp. 60–76). Leverkusen, Germany, Barbara Budrich Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiberghien A. Learning and teaching: differentiation and relation. Research in Science Education. 1997;27(3):359–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiberghien A, Malkoun L. Différenciation des pratiques d’enseignement et acquisitions des élèves du point de vue du savoir. Education et Didactique. 2007;1:29–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiberghien A, Malkoun L. Construction of physics knowledge in a classroom community: analysies from teacher’s, students’ and the community perspectives. In: Schwarz B, Dreyfus T, Hershkovitz R, editors. Transformation of knowledge in classroom interaction. New York: Routledge; 2009. p. 42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiberghien A, Vince J, Gaidioz P. Design-based Research: Case of a teaching sequence on mechanics. International Journal of Science Education. 2009;31(17):2275–2314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiberghien, A., & Malkoun, L. (2010). Analysis of classroom practices from the knowledge point of view: how to characterize them and relate them to students’ performances. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 10(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiberghien A, Vince J, Gaidioz P, Coince D. Professional development of teachers and researchers in a collaborative development of teaching resources. In: Linder C, Ostman L, Roberts DA, Wickman P-O, Erickson G, MacKinnon A, editors. Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy. New York: Routledge; 2011. p. 255–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veillard L, Tiberghien A. Instrumentation de la recherche en Education. Le cas du développement d’une base de vidéos de situation d’enseignement et d’apprentissage ViSA. Paris: Maison des Sciences de l’Homme; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veyne P. Comment on écrit l’histoire. Paris: Seuil; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder C. Being analog. In: Berger AA, editor. The postmodern presence: Readings on postmodernism in American culture and Society. Walnut Creek, California: Rowman AltaMira; 1998. p. 239–253.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

TIberghien, A., Sensevy, G. (2012). The Nature of Video Studies in Science Education. In: Jorde, D., Dillon, J. (eds) Science Education Research and Practice in Europe. Cultural Perpectives in Science Education, vol 5. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-900-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics