Abstract
The use of video recordings as data in research studies in science education began in the 1970s. After almost thirty years, this use is widespread among researchers; video is included in regular research practice. However as any “new instrument”, video has modified researchers’ practice to the extent that the nature of information given to researchers is different from that of written data, direct observation and even audio recordings. In this chapter, our aim is mainly to give insight into the characteristics of video data and the complex nature of video. In part one we present specific characteristics, mainly the physical ones, then in part two we discuss to what extent one main characteristic of the video is its analogy with the recorded part of the situation in terms of events kept or transformed in the analyses, and in part three we present an actual research study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ash D. Using video data to capture discontinuous science meaning making in non school settings. In: Goldman R, Pea R, Barron B, Derry S, editors. Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007. p. 207–226.
Ash D. Thematic continuities: talking and thinking about adaptation in a socially complex classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2008;45(1):1–30.
Barron B. Video as a tool to advance understanding of learning and development in peer, family and other informal learning contexts. In: Goldman R, Pea R, Barron B, Derry S, editors. Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007. p. 159–187.
Brousseau G. Théorie des situations didactiques. Grenoble: La pensée sauvage; 1998.
Bruner JS. The Narrative Construction of Reality. Critical Inquiry. 1991;18(1):1–21.
Bruner JS. The culture of education. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 1996.
Chevallard Y. La transposition didactique. 2nd ed. Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage; 1991.
Clarke D, Keitel C, Shimizu Y, editors. Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries: the insider’s perspective. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers; 2006.
Cobb P, Gresalfi M, Hodge LL. A design research perspective on the identities that students are developing in mathematics classrooms. In: Schwarz B, Dreyfus T, Hershkovitz R, editors. Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction. New York: Routledge; 2009. p. 223–243.
Cross, D., Khanfour-Armalé, R., Badreddine, Z., Malkoun, L., & Seck, M. (2009). Méthodologie de mise au point d’un consensus entre chercheurs: le cas du thème, 1er colloque international de l’ARCD Où va la didactique comparée. Université de Genève.
Derry SJ, Pea RD, Barron B, Engle RA, Erickson F, Goldman R, et al. Conducting Video Research in the Learning Sciences: Guidance on Selection, Analysis, Technology, and Ethics. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2010;19(1):3–53.
Descombes V. Les institutions du sens. Paris: Minuit; 1996.
Engle RA. Framing interactions to foster generative learning: a situative explanation of transfer in a community of learners classroom. The journal of the learning sciences. 2006;15(4):451–498.
Engle RA, Conant FR, Greeno JG. Progressive refinement of hypotheses in video-supported research. In: Goldman R, Pea R, Barron B, Derry SJ, editors. Video research in the learning sciences. Mawah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007. p. 239–254.
Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2000). The influence of an historically oriented course on students’ content knowledge in optics evaluated by means of facets-schemes analysis. American Journal of Physics, 68 (Supplement)(7), S3–S15.
Goldman-Segall, R. (1998). Points of viewing children’s thinking. Mahaw, New jersey: LEA.
Goldman R, Pea R, Barron B, Derry S. Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007.
Goldman S, McDermott R. Staying the course with video analysis. In: Goldman R, Pea R, Barron B, Derry S, editors. Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007. p. 101–113.
Hacking, I. (1983/2005). Representing an Intervening. Cambridge: University Press Cambridge.
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, J. H. R., Garnier, H., Bogard, K., Hollingsworth, G. H., Jacobs, J., Chui, A. M.-Y., Wearne, D., Smith, M., Kersting, N., Manaster, A., Tseng, E., Etterbeek, W., Manaster, C., Gonzales, P., & Stigler, J. (2003). Teaching Mathematics in Seven Countries. Results from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study: National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) U.S. Department of Education.
Latour B. Reassembling the Social- An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
Lemke JL. The long and the short of it: comments on multiple timescale studies of human activities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2001;10(1&2):17–26.
Lemke JL, Sabelli NH. Complex Systems and Educational Change: Towards a new research agenda. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2008;40(1):118–129.
Ligozat, F. (2008). Un point de vue de didactique comparée sur la classe de mathématiques. Unpublished doctorate, Université de Genève et université de Provence.
MacWhinney B. A transcript-video database for collaborative commentary in the learning sciences. In: Goldman R, Pea R, Barron B, Derry S, editors. Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007. p. 537–546.
Malkoun, L. (2007). De la caractérisation des pratiques de classes de physique à leur relation aux performances des élèves: étude de cas en France et au Liban. Unpublished Doctorate, Université Lyon 2 / Université libanaise, Lyon/Beyrouth.
Malkoun, L., & Tiberghien, A. (2008). Objets de savoir et processus scientifiques en jeu dans les productions discursives en classe de physique de lycée. In L. Filliettaz & M.-L. Schubauer-Leoni (Eds.), Processus interactionnels et situations éducatives, coll. Raisons éducatives (pp. 67–88). Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Marlot, C. (2008). Caractérisation des transactions didactiques : Deux études de cas en découverte du monde vivant au cycle II de l’école élémentaire. Doctorat en sciences de l’éducation, Université Rennes 2, Rennes.
Mead, M., & Bateson, G. (1976) For God’s Sake, Margaret: A Conversation with Gregory Bateson and Margaret Mead, edited by Stewart Brand. CoEvolution Quarterly (Summer), pp. 32–44. Reprinted in part as Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson on the Use of the Camera in Anthropology. Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication, Vol. 4, no. 2, (Winter 1977), pp. 78–80.
Mercier A, Schauber-Leoni ML, Sensevy G. Vers une didactique comparée. Revue Française de Pédagogie. 2002;141:5–16.
Miller K, Zhou X. Learning from classroom video: what makes it compelling and what makes it hard. In: Goldman R, Pea R, Barron B, Derry S, editors. Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007. p. 321–334.
Minstrell J. Facets of students’ knowledge and relevant instruction. In: Duit R, Goldberg F, Niedderer H, editors. Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies. Kiel: IPN; 1992. p. 110–128.
Mondada L. Video Recording as the Reflexive Preservation and Configuration of Phenomenal Features for Analysis. In: Knoblauch H, Raab J, Soeffner H-G, Schnettler B, editors. Video Analysis. Bern: Lang; 2006. p. 51–68.
Petri J, Niedderer H. A Learning pathway in high-school level quantum atomic physics. International Journal of Science Education. 1998;20(8):1075–1088.
Powel AB, Francisco JM, Maher CA. An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. The journal of mathematical behavior. 2003;22:405–435.
Quéré L. L’environnement comme partenaire. In: Barbier J-M, Durand M, editors. Sujets, activités, environnements. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; 2006. p. 6–29.
Roth, K. J., Druker, S. L., Garnier, H. E., Lemmens, M., Chen, C., Kawanaka, T., Rasmussen, D., Trubacova, S., Warvi, D., Okamoto, Y., Gonzales, P., Stigler, J., & Gallimore, R. (2006). Teaching Science in Five Countries: Results From the TIMSS 1999 Video Study Statistical Analysis Report (NCES 2006–011). Washington: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Roth W-M, Tobin KG, Ritchie SM. Time and temporality as mediators of science learning. Science Education. 2008;92(1):115–140.
Seidel, T., & Prenzel, M. (2006). Stability of teaching patterns in physics instruction: findings from a video study. Learning and Instruction, 228–240.
Sensevy, G., Mercier, A., Schubauer-Leoni, M-L., Ligozat, F. Perrot, G (2005). An attempt to model the teacher’s action in mathematics, Educational Studies in mathematics, 59(1), 153–181.
Sensevy, G. (2007). Des catégories pour décrire et comprendre l’action didactique. In G. Sensevy & A. Mercier (Eds.), Agir ensemble : Eléments de théorisation de l’action conjointe du professeur et des élèves (pp. 13–49). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes (PUR).
Sensevy G, Tiberghien A, Santini J, Laubé S, Griggs P. Modelling, an epistemological approach: cases studies and implications for science teaching. Science Education. 2008;92(3):424–446.
Sensevy, G. (2011a). Le sens du savoir. Éléments pour une théorie de l’action conjointe en didactique. Bruxelles: de Boeck.
Sensevy, G. (2011b) Overcoming fragmentation: towards a joint action theory in didactics. In Hudson, B. & Meyer, M. A. (Eds.) Beyond Fragmentation: Didactics, Learning, and Teaching (pp. 60–76). Leverkusen, Germany, Barbara Budrich Publishers.
Tiberghien A. Learning and teaching: differentiation and relation. Research in Science Education. 1997;27(3):359–382.
Tiberghien A, Malkoun L. Différenciation des pratiques d’enseignement et acquisitions des élèves du point de vue du savoir. Education et Didactique. 2007;1:29–54.
Tiberghien A, Malkoun L. Construction of physics knowledge in a classroom community: analysies from teacher’s, students’ and the community perspectives. In: Schwarz B, Dreyfus T, Hershkovitz R, editors. Transformation of knowledge in classroom interaction. New York: Routledge; 2009. p. 42–55.
Tiberghien A, Vince J, Gaidioz P. Design-based Research: Case of a teaching sequence on mechanics. International Journal of Science Education. 2009;31(17):2275–2314.
Tiberghien, A., & Malkoun, L. (2010). Analysis of classroom practices from the knowledge point of view: how to characterize them and relate them to students’ performances. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 10(1).
Tiberghien A, Vince J, Gaidioz P, Coince D. Professional development of teachers and researchers in a collaborative development of teaching resources. In: Linder C, Ostman L, Roberts DA, Wickman P-O, Erickson G, MacKinnon A, editors. Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy. New York: Routledge; 2011. p. 255–271.
Veillard L, Tiberghien A. Instrumentation de la recherche en Education. Le cas du développement d’une base de vidéos de situation d’enseignement et d’apprentissage ViSA. Paris: Maison des Sciences de l’Homme; 2012.
Veyne P. Comment on écrit l’histoire. Paris: Seuil; 1971.
Wilder C. Being analog. In: Berger AA, editor. The postmodern presence: Readings on postmodernism in American culture and Society. Walnut Creek, California: Rowman AltaMira; 1998. p. 239–253.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
TIberghien, A., Sensevy, G. (2012). The Nature of Video Studies in Science Education. In: Jorde, D., Dillon, J. (eds) Science Education Research and Practice in Europe. Cultural Perpectives in Science Education, vol 5. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-900-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-900-8_7
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-900-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)