Skip to main content

Commentary

The Future Development of Research on Classroom Talk

  • Chapter

Abstract

It is hard to say exactly when the systematic, in-depth study of classroom talk began, but as Edwards and Westgate note in their influential book on methods, “to find verbatim transcripts of classroom talk produced before about 1970 is difficult” (1994, p. 1). After gaining a strong stimulus around that time from the work of pioneers such as Bellack, Kliebard, Hyman and Smith (1966) and Barnes, Britton and Rosen (1969), it has been an active field of endeavour. Although not a unified field in terms of theory and methodology, it presents some interesting and valuable findings. In this commentary, I offer my own views on how this field is developing and might be developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armstrong, V. & Curran, S. (2006). Developing a collaborative mode of research using digital video Computers and Education, 46, 336-347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes D. Exploratory talk for learning. In: Mercer N, Hodgkinson S, editors. Exploring talk in school. London: Sage; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes D, Britton J, Rosen H. Language, the learner and the school. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellack A, Kliebard H, Hyman R, Smith F. The language of the classroom. Columbia: Teachers College Press; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown A, Palincsar AS. Guided, co-operative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In: Resnick L, editor. Knowing, Learning and Instruction. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • ChAT (2010). The Children Articulating Thinking Project. University of Cambridge. Retrieved from http://www.educ.cam.ac.uk/research/academicgroups/psychology/projects/chat.html.

  • Chinn C, Anderson R, Waggoner M. Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion. Reading Research Quarterly. 2001;36:378–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels H. Vygotsky and research. Abingdon: Routledge; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes L. Talk and learning in classroom science. International Journal of Science Education. 2004;26(6):667–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. D., & Westgate, D. (1994). Investigating classroom talk (2nd ed.). London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., & Larkin, S. (2008). Pedagogy or ideological struggle? An examination of pupils' and teachers' expectations for talk in the classroom. Language and Education, 22, 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillen J, Kleine Staarman J, Littleton K, Mercer N, Twiner A. A 'learning revolution'? Investigating pedagogic practice around interactive whiteboards in British primary schools. Learning, Media and Technology. 2007;32:243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy S, Deaney R. The impact of collaborative video analysis by practitioners and researchers upon pedagogical thinking and practice: A follow-up study. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice. 2009;15:617–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe C. Peer Groups and Children's Development. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewitt C, Kress G, Ogborn J, Tsartsarelis C. Exploring learning through visual, actional and linguistic communication: The multimodal environment of science classroom. Educational Review. 2004;1:6–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyriacou, C., & Issitt, J. (2008). What characterizes effective teacher-pupil dialogue to promote conceptual understanding in mathematics lessons in England in Key Stages 2 and 3? EPPI-Centre Report no. 1604R. Social Science Research Unit: Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maybin J. Children's voices: Talk, knowledge and identity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, C. (1999). From thinking skills to thinking classrooms: A review and evaluation of approaches for developing pupils' thinking. London: DFEE Research Report RR115

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer N. The seeds of time: Why classroom dialogue needs a temporal analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2008;17:33–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer N. The analysis of classroom talk: methods and methodologies. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2009;80:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer N, Littleton K. Dialogue and the development of children's thinking: A sociocultural approach. London: Routledge; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer N, Warwick P, Kershner R, Kleine Staarman J. Can the interactive whiteboard provide 'dialogic space' for children's collaborative activity? Language and Education. 2010;24(4):1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuthall G. Learning how to learn: The evolution of students' minds through the social processes and culture of the classroom. International Journal of Educational Research. 1999;31(3):139–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas-Drummond S, Mercer N, Dabrowski E. Collaboration, scaffolding and the promotion of problem solving strategies in Mexican pre-schoolers. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 2001;16:179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder I. Multiple perspectives in literacy research: integrating the quantitative and qualitative. Language and Education. 1995;9:22–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenman M, Wilhelm P, Beishuizen JJ. The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills from a developmental perspective. Learning and Instruction. 2004;14:89–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang MC, Haertel GD, Walberg HJ. What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature. Journal of Educational Research. 1990;84:30–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb N, Nemer K, Ing M. Small-group reflections: Parallels between teacher discourse and student behavior in peer-directed groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2006;15:63–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitebread D, Anderson H, Coltman P, Page C, Pino Pasternak D, Mehta S. Developing independent learning in the early years. Education. 2005;3–13(33):40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., Crosson, A., & Resnick, L. (2006). Accountable talk in reading comprehension instruction. CSE Technical Report 670. Learning and Research Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Baljit Kaur

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mercer, N. (2012). Commentary. In: Kaur, B. (eds) Understanding Teaching and Learning. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-864-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics