Skip to main content

Students’ Trends and Attitudes on Exam Cheating in Greek Primary and Secondary School Settings

  • Chapter
Changes in Teachers’ Moral Role

Abstract

The research pertaining to all forms of cheating, namely exam cheating, homework cheating, plagiarism, academic dishonesty, is extensive. Since 1970 a number of studies have been carried out to investigate cheating, as well as the students’ attitudes and beliefs on this issue (Anderman, Griesinger, & Westerfield, 1998; DePalma, Madey, & Bornschein 1995; Eisenberg, 2004; Evans & Craig, 1990a, 1990b; Hutton, 2006; Miller, Staub, & Visser, 2005; Murdock, 1999; Nath & Lovaglia, 2009; Passow, Mayhew, Finelli, Harding, & Carpenter, 2006; Pnevmatikos & Makris, 2006; Strom & Strom, 2007).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50:179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I. Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2002;32:665–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderman E, Griesinger T, Westerfield G. Motivation and cheating during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1998;60:84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronowitz, H., & Giroux, H. (1986). Teaching and the role of the transformative intellectual. In H. Aronowitz & H. Giroux (Eds.), Education under siege. The conservative, liberal and radical debate over schooling (pp. 100-121). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister RF, Leary MR. The need to belong: Desire for attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin. 1995;117:497–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi RA, Metzger RL, Bruno RGS, Hoogkamp MAW, Reyes LE, Barnaby GH. Examining the decision process of students' cheating behavior: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics. 2004;50(4):397–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer M. Research design and issues of validity. In: Reis H, Judd C, editors. Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. p. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy J, Good T. Teacher behavior and student achievement. In: Wittrock MC, editor. Handbook of research on teaching. 3rd ed. New York: McMillan; 1986. p. 328–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell E. Professional ethics in teaching: Towards the development of a code of practice. Cambridge Journal of Education. 2007;30(2):203–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chriss JJ. The functions of the social bond. The Sociological Quarterly. 2007;48(4):689–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePalma MT, Madey SF, Bornschein S. Individual differences and cheating behavior: Guilt and cheating in competitive situations. Personality and Individual Differences. 1995;18:761–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg J. To cheat or not to cheat: Effects of moral perspective and situational variables on students' attitudes. Journal of Moral Education. 2004;33:163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster J. Explaining social behavior. More nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans ED, Craig D. Adolescent cognitions for academic cheating as a function of grade level and achievement status. Journal of Adolescent Research. 1990a;5:325–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans ED, Craig D. Teacher and student perceptions of academic cheating in middle and senior high schools. Journal of Educational Research. 1990b;84:44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs JP. Norms, deviance, and social control: conceptual matters. New York: Elsevier; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harker P. Cheating: The new epidemic. Global Agenda. 2005;3:193–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton PA. Understanding student cheating and what educators can do about it. College Teaching. 2006;54:171–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce B, Weil M. Models of teaching. London: Prentice-Hall; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang MJ, Glassman M. Moral action as social capital, moral thought as cultural capital. Journal ofMoral Education. 2010;39(1):21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiser AIT, Morrison EE, Craven A. The application of Kohlberg's moral development model to college students' technology ethic decisions. Journal of College Teaching & Learning. 2009;6(5):89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development (Vol. 1). New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg L. The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco: Harper and Row; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis R. Classroom discipline and student responsibility: The students' view. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2001;17:307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CHS, Wen ZLYM. Academic dishonesty in higher education - a nationwide study in Taiwan. Higher Education. 2007;54:85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe DL, Trevino LK, Butterfield KD. Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior. 2001;11(3):219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe DM, Trevino LK. Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education. 1993;64:522–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller DT, Staub BD, Visser PS. How surveillance begets perceptions of dishonesty: The case of the counterfactual sinner. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2005;89:117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock TB. The social context of risk: Predictors of alienation in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1999;91:62–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath, L., & Lovaglia, M. (2009). Cheating on multiple choice exams. Monitoring, assessment, and an optional assignment. College Teaching, 57, 3-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings N. The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. New York: Teachers' College Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passow HJ, Mayhew MJ, Finelli CJ, Harding TS, Carpenter DD. Factors influencing engineering students' decisions to cheat by type of assessment. Research in Higher Education. 2006;47:643–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne SL, Nantz KS. Social accounts and metaphors about cheating. College Teaching. 1994;42:90–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pnevmatikos, D., & Makris, N. (2006). Cheating during childhood. In D. Hatzidimou, K. Mpikos, K. Stravakou, & K. Hatzidimou (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5 th Pan-hellenic conference ofpedagogical society of Greece (pp. 377-344). Thessaloniki: Kyriakidis Bros (in Greek).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettinger DA, Kramer Y. Situational and personal causes of student cheating. Research in Higher Education. 2008;50:293–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab F. Schooling without learning: Thirty years of cheating in high school. Adolescence. 1991;26:839–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon D, Snow CJ, Read SJ. The redux of cognitive consistency theories: Evidence judgments by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2004;86(6):814–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg L. Beyond the classroom: Why school reform has failed and what parents need to do. New York: Simon & Schuster; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strom PS, Strom RD. Cheating in middle school and high school. The Educational Forum. 2007;71:104–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teodorescu D, Andrei T. Faculty and peer influences on academic integrity: College cheating in Romania. Higher Education. 2009;57:267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon Thomas Sarver J. Ajzen and Fishbein's 'Theory of reasoned action': A critical assessment. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 1983;13(2):155–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss T, Abraham M. Rational choice theory in sociology: A survey. In: Quah SR, Sales A, editors. The international handbook of sociology. London: Sage; 2000. p. 50–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yüksel S. Kohlberg and hidden curriculum in moral education: An opportunity for students' acquisition of moral values in the new Turkish primary education curriculum. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. 2005;5(2):329–338.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dimitriadou, C., Gakoudi, A., Kalaitzidou-Leontaki, A., Kousaridis, K. (2012). Students’ Trends and Attitudes on Exam Cheating in Greek Primary and Secondary School Settings. In: Alt, D., Reingold, R. (eds) Changes in Teachers’ Moral Role. Moral Development and Citizenship Education, vol 6. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-837-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships