Skip to main content

Learning Progressions For Multiple Purposes

Challenges in Using Learning Progressions

  • Chapter
Learning Progressions in Science

Abstract

The using strand addresses the many different ways learning progressions are expected to impact science education. Learning progressions have been proposed as frameworks that can inform the development of standards, large-scale assessments, classroom assessments, curriculum development, and teacher preparation/ professional development. By providing a common framework, learning progressions have the potential to bring coherence to these multiple facets of science education (National Research Council [NRC], 2007). Thus the use of learning progressions may significantly influence other strands of learning progression work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alonzo AC, Benus M, Bennett W, Pinney B. September). Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the European Science Education Research Association, Istanbul, Turkey: A learning progression for elementary school students' understanding of plant nutrition; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonzo AC, Gearhart M. Considering learning progressions from a classroom assessment perspective. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives. 2006;14:99–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barab S, Squire K. Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2004;13:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs DC, Alonzo AC, Schwab C, Wilson M. Diagnostic assessment with ordered multiple-choice items. Educational Assessment. 2006;11:33–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown AL. Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 1992;2:141–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb P, Gravemeijer K. Experimenting to support and understand learning processes. In: Kelly AE, Lesh R, Baek JY, editors. Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching. London, UK: Routledge; 2008. p. 68–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis EA, Krajcik JS. Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher. 2005;34(3):3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duschl R. Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education. 2008;32:268–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gravemeijer K, Cobb P. Design research from a learning design perspective. In: van den Akker J, Gravemeijer K, McKenney S, Nieveen N, editors. Educational design research. New York: Routledge; 2008. p. 17–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (in press). Supporting inquiry about the foundations of evolutionary thinking in the elementary grades. In J. Shrager and S. Carver (Eds.), From child to scientist: Mechanisms of learning and development. Washington, DC: APA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2010, July). A framework for science education: Preliminary public draft. Retrieved from the National Academies website: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/Standards_Framework_Homepage.html

  • National Research Council. A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. A. (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith CL, Wiser M, Anderson CW, Krajcik J. Implications of research on children's learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and atomic- molecular theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives. 2006;4:1–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky LS. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. London, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins G, McTighe J. Understanding by design (expanded. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Alicia C. Alonzo Amelia Wenk Gotwals

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gotwals, A.W. (2012). Learning Progressions For Multiple Purposes. In: Alonzo, A.C., Gotwals, A.W. (eds) Learning Progressions in Science. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-824-7_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships