Skip to main content

The Special Educational Needs and Disability Act (Senda) 2001

A Neoliberal Appraisal.

  • Chapter
Policy, Discourse and Rhetoric

Part of the book series: Educational Futures Rethinking Theory and Practice ((EDUFUT,volume 52))

  • 663 Accesses

Abstract

On either side of the Atlantic, neoliberalism is engulfing schools with a tsunamic magnitude. In the United States under certain provisions of the 2001 No Child Left Behind there is a pernicious government disinvestment in public schools on the one hand, and an insurgency of capitalist private take overs, on the other. In the United Kingdom, under provisions of the largely controversial Academies Act 2010, the coalition government is continuing with New Labour's structural transformation of schools. It should be noted that this brutish transformation is backed by certain legislation and that other previous legislation while still active will need to be interpreted in a way that is responsive to current trends. In terms of policy and practice, special/inclusive education has been left basking in the bashing climate of neoliberalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Anonymous. (2002). Have you seen this? SENDA 2001 and DDA 1995 legislation checklist: implications for higher education. MSOR Connections, 2(4), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple M. Freire, neoliberalism and education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. 1999;20(1):5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong F, Barton L, editors. Disability, Human Rights and Education: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball S. Education Reform: A Critical and Poststructural Approach. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball S. Policy sociology and the critical social research: A personal review of recent education policy and policy research. British Educational Research Journal. 1997;23(3):257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball S. The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy. 2003;18(2):215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball S. Education PLC. London: Routledge; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton L, Armstrong F. Engaging with disabling policies: Troubles and contests in a local education authority in England. Research in Education. 2003;70:37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bines H. Inclusive standards? Current developments in policy for special educational needs in England and Wales. Oxford Review of Education. 2000;26(1):21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campoverde, C. Frameworks for Policy Analysis, FAU, 297–324. Retrieved June 01, 2009, from http://www.fau.edu/~campover/framework.doc.

  • Clark C, Dyson A, Millward A, editors. Theorising Special Education. London: Routledge; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colebatch H. Policy analysis, policy practice and political science. Research and Evaluation. 2005;64(3):14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driessen G. The limits of educational policy and practice? The case of ethnic minorities in the Netherlands. Comparative Education. 2000;36(1):55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser N. Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In: Calhoun C, editor. Habermas and the Public Sphere (pp. 109–142).: MIT Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman T. The World is Flat: The Globalised World in the Twenty-First Century. London: Penguin Books; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall K. An analysis of primary literacy policy in England using Barthe's Notion of 'Readerly' and 'Writerly' Texts'. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy. 2001;1(2):153–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanberger A. What is the policy problem?: Methodological challenges in policy evaluation. Evaluation. 2001;7:45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard C. The Policy Cycle: A model of post-Machiavellian policy making. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 2005;64(3):3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmel Committee, Report. (1973, May). Schools in Australia: Report of the Interim Committee for the Australian Schools Commission. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly A. Globalisation and education: A review of conflicting perspectives and their effect on policy and professional practice in the UK. Globalisation, Societies and Education. 2009;7(1):51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lall M, Vickers E, editors. Education as a Political Tool in Asia. London: Routledge; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall M. Education in Myanmar – the interplay of state, civil society and business. In: Skidmore M, Wilson T, editors. Dictatorship, Disorder and Decline in Myanmar. Canberra: ANU E- Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark O, Michael P. Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy. 2005;20(3):313–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye Jr J. Bridging the gap between theory and policy. Political Psychology. 2008;29(4):593–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver M. The Individual and Social Models of Disability. Thames Polytechnic: Paper presented at joint workshop of the living options and the research unit of the Royal College of Physicians; 1990, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozga J, Gewirtz S. Sex, lies and audiotape: Interviewing the education policy elite. In: Haplin D, Troyna B, editors. Researching Education Policy: Ethical and Methodological Issues. London: Falmer Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts P, Armstrong F, Marsterton M, editors. Equality and Diversity in Education: National and International Contexts. London: Routledge; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rix J, Simmons K, Nind M, Sheehy K, editors. Policy and Power in Inclusive Education: Values into Practice. Oxon: RoutledgeFalmer; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse M, Florian L. Inclusive education in the market-place. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 1998;1(4):323–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SENDA. (2001). Retrieved May 17, 2009, from http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts2001/ukpga_20010010.

  • Shaw K. The Politics of higher education. In: Robins L, editor. Politics and Policy-Making in Britain. England: Longman Group UK Ltd.; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevlin M, Rose R. Pupils as partners in education decision-making: Responding to the legislation in England and Ireland. European Journal of Special Needs Education. 2008;23(4):423–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tee N. Education policy rhetoric and reality gap: A reflection. International Journal of Educational Management. 2008;22(6):595–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, J. (2001). Segregated special schools must close. In Greater Manchester of Disabled People's Magazine, Coalition (pp. 12–16).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tambi, T.M. (2012). The Special Educational Needs and Disability Act (Senda) 2001. In: Lall, M. (eds) Policy, Discourse and Rhetoric. Educational Futures Rethinking Theory and Practice, vol 52. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-817-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships