Abstract
On the surface it would seem that being a researcher and being creative are at opposite ends of a spectrum. However, closer scrutiny of these words and their associated practises/processes lends a different perspective. Research can be defined as the systematic investigation into and study of materials and sources in order to establish facts and reach new conclusions (n.d). This presupposes that the researcher has systems in place to address all features of the research necessary in order to reach valid and credible conclusions and establish theory that resonates with the reader.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ackermann, E., Gauntlett, D., & Weckstrom, C. (2009). Defining systematic creativity: Explaining the nature of creativity and how the LEGO® System of Play relates to it. LEGO® Learning Institute.Available: http://learninginstitute.lego.com/en-us/Research/Systematic%2BCreativity.aspx,accessed 31 August 2010.
Amabile, T.M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76(5): 76–87.
Banaji, S., & Burn, A., with Buckingham, D. (2006). The rhetorics of creativity: A review of the literature. London: Institute of Education, University of London and the Arts Council England.
Bohm, D. (1998). On creativity. London: Routledge.
Bulman, C. (2004). An introduction to reflection. In C. Bulman & S. Schutz (Eds.), Reflective practice in nursing (pp. 1–24). Oxford: Blackwell.
Creative. (n.d.). In Online Oxford dictionaries. Available: http://oxforddictionaries.com/view/entry/m_en_gb0189370#m_en_gb0189370, accessed 31 August 2010.
Crist, J.D., & Tanner, C.A. (2003). Interpretation/analysis methods in Hermeneutic interpretive phenomenology. Nursing Research, 52(3), 202–205.
de Bono, E. (1992). Sur/petition: Creating value monopolies when everyone else is merely competing. Toronto: Harper Collins.
Eisner, E.W. (1962). A typology of creative behavior in the visual arts. In E.W. Eisner & D.W. Ecker (Eds.), Readings in art education (pp. 323–335). Waltham, MA: Blaisdell Publishing.
Grbich, C. (2010). Interpreting quality in qualitative research. In J. Higgs, N. Cherry, R. Macklin & R. Ajjawi (Eds.), Researching practice. A discourse on qualitative methodologies (pp. 153–164). Rotterdam: Sense.
Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191–216). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Higgs, J., & Trede, F. (2010a). Philosophical frameworks and research communities. In J. Higgs, N. Cherry, R. Macklin & R. Ajjawi (Eds.), Researching practice: A discourse on qualitative methodologies (pp. 31–36). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
Higgs, J., & Trede, F. (2010b). Theoretical frameworks and literature: Framing and supporting qualitative research. In J. Higgs, N. Cherry, R. Macklin & R. Ajjawi (Eds.), Researching practice: A discourse on qualitative methodologies (pp. 57–64). Rotterdam: Sense.
Jarvis. P. (1992). Paradoxes of learning: On becoming an individual in society. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
Koch, T. (1994). Establishing rigour in qualitative research: The decision trail. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(5), 976–986.
Leininger, M. (1994). Evaluation criteria and critique of qualitative research studies. In J.M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 95–115). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Loehle, C. (1990). A guide to increased creativity in research: Inspiration or perspiration? BioScience, 40, 123–129.
Macquarie Online. (n.d.). Available: http://www.macquarieonline.com.au/,accessed 4 December 2010.
Martin, P. (2010). Making space for creativity. Creativity Centre, University of Brighton.
Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2000). Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 320, 50–52.
Negus, K., & Pickering, M. (2004). Creativity, communication and cultural value. London: Sage.
Online etymology dictionary. (n.d.). Available:http://www.etymonline.com/,accessed 21 January 2011.
Polgar, S., & Thomas, S.A. (2008). Introduction to research in the health sciences. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
Policastro, E., & Gardner, H. (1999). From case studies to robust generalizations: An approach to the study of creativity. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 213–25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Research (n.d). In Online etymology dictionary. Available:http://www.etymonline.com/,accessed 21 January 2011.
Rothwell, R. (1998). Philosophical paradigms and qualitative research. In J. Higgs (Ed.), Writing qualitative research (pp. 21–28). Sydney: Hampden Press.
Sanger, J. (1994). Seven types of creativity: Looking for insights in data analysis. British Educational Research Journal, 20(2), 175.
Snappy Words. (n.d.). Available: http://www.snappywords.com/,accessed 31 August 2010.
Steffens, B. (2006). Ibn al-Haytham: First scientist. Greensboro, NC: Morgan Reynolds.
Systematic. (n.d.). In Online Oxford Dictionaries. Available:http://oxforddictionaries.com/view/entry/m_en_gb0839200#m_en_gb0839200,accessed 31 August 2010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coyle, J., Olsen, M. (2011). Learning to Be a Researcher. In: Higgs, J., Titchen, A., Horsfall, D., Bridges, D. (eds) Creative Spaces for Qualitative Researching. Practice, Education, Work and Society, vol 5. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-761-5_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-761-5_17
Publisher Name: SensePublishers
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-761-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)