Skip to main content

Learning to Be a Researcher

Bridging the Gap between Research and Creativity

  • Chapter
Creative Spaces for Qualitative Researching

Part of the book series: Practice, Education, Work and Society ((PEWS,volume 5))

Abstract

On the surface it would seem that being a researcher and being creative are at opposite ends of a spectrum. However, closer scrutiny of these words and their associated practises/processes lends a different perspective. Research can be defined as the systematic investigation into and study of materials and sources in order to establish facts and reach new conclusions (n.d). This presupposes that the researcher has systems in place to address all features of the research necessary in order to reach valid and credible conclusions and establish theory that resonates with the reader.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackermann, E., Gauntlett, D., & Weckstrom, C. (2009). Defining systematic creativity: Explaining the nature of creativity and how the LEGO® System of Play relates to it. LEGO® Learning Institute.Available: http://learninginstitute.lego.com/en-us/Research/Systematic%2BCreativity.aspx,accessed 31 August 2010.

  • Amabile, T.M. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, 76(5): 76–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banaji, S., & Burn, A., with Buckingham, D. (2006). The rhetorics of creativity: A review of the literature. London: Institute of Education, University of London and the Arts Council England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1998). On creativity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulman, C. (2004). An introduction to reflection. In C. Bulman & S. Schutz (Eds.), Reflective practice in nursing (pp. 1–24). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creative. (n.d.). In Online Oxford dictionaries. Available: http://oxforddictionaries.com/view/entry/m_en_gb0189370#m_en_gb0189370, accessed 31 August 2010.

  • Crist, J.D., & Tanner, C.A. (2003). Interpretation/analysis methods in Hermeneutic interpretive phenomenology. Nursing Research, 52(3), 202–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bono, E. (1992). Sur/petition: Creating value monopolies when everyone else is merely competing. Toronto: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E.W. (1962). A typology of creative behavior in the visual arts. In E.W. Eisner & D.W. Ecker (Eds.), Readings in art education (pp. 323–335). Waltham, MA: Blaisdell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grbich, C. (2010). Interpreting quality in qualitative research. In J. Higgs, N. Cherry, R. Macklin & R. Ajjawi (Eds.), Researching practice. A discourse on qualitative methodologies (pp. 153–164). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions and emerging confluences. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191–216). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, J., & Trede, F. (2010a). Philosophical frameworks and research communities. In J. Higgs, N. Cherry, R. Macklin & R. Ajjawi (Eds.), Researching practice: A discourse on qualitative methodologies (pp. 31–36). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, J., & Trede, F. (2010b). Theoretical frameworks and literature: Framing and supporting qualitative research. In J. Higgs, N. Cherry, R. Macklin & R. Ajjawi (Eds.), Researching practice: A discourse on qualitative methodologies (pp. 57–64). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis. P. (1992). Paradoxes of learning: On becoming an individual in society. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, T. (1994). Establishing rigour in qualitative research: The decision trail. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(5), 976–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leininger, M. (1994). Evaluation criteria and critique of qualitative research studies. In J.M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 95–115). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loehle, C. (1990). A guide to increased creativity in research: Inspiration or perspiration? BioScience, 40, 123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macquarie Online. (n.d.). Available: http://www.macquarieonline.com.au/,accessed 4 December 2010.

  • Martin, P. (2010). Making space for creativity. Creativity Centre, University of Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2000). Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 320, 50–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negus, K., & Pickering, M. (2004). Creativity, communication and cultural value. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Online etymology dictionary. (n.d.). Available:http://www.etymonline.com/,accessed 21 January 2011.

  • Polgar, S., & Thomas, S.A. (2008). Introduction to research in the health sciences. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Policastro, E., & Gardner, H. (1999). From case studies to robust generalizations: An approach to the study of creativity. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 213–25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Research (n.d). In Online etymology dictionary. Available:http://www.etymonline.com/,accessed 21 January 2011.

  • Rothwell, R. (1998). Philosophical paradigms and qualitative research. In J. Higgs (Ed.), Writing qualitative research (pp. 21–28). Sydney: Hampden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger, J. (1994). Seven types of creativity: Looking for insights in data analysis. British Educational Research Journal, 20(2), 175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snappy Words. (n.d.). Available: http://www.snappywords.com/,accessed 31 August 2010.

  • Steffens, B. (2006). Ibn al-Haytham: First scientist. Greensboro, NC: Morgan Reynolds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Systematic. (n.d.). In Online Oxford Dictionaries. Available:http://oxforddictionaries.com/view/entry/m_en_gb0839200#m_en_gb0839200,accessed 31 August 2010.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coyle, J., Olsen, M. (2011). Learning to Be a Researcher. In: Higgs, J., Titchen, A., Horsfall, D., Bridges, D. (eds) Creative Spaces for Qualitative Researching. Practice, Education, Work and Society, vol 5. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-761-5_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships