Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Moral Development and Citizenship Education ((MORA,volume 5))

Abstract

The Multiple Intelligences Profiling Questionnaire VII (MIPQ VII, see Tirri & Komulainen, 2002; Tirri, Nokelainen & Ubani, 2006; Tirri & Nokelainen, 2007) is a five-point Likert scale(Likert, 1932) self-rating questionnaire that is based on Howard Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences (MI) theory (1983, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2000, 2006).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Albrecht, K. (2006). Social intelligence. The new science of success. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1970). Essentials of psychological testing. Third edition. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind. London: Fontana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1995). Reflections on multiple intelligences. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 200–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (2000). A case against spiritual intelligence. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 10, 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (2006). Development and education of the mind. The selected works of Howard Gardner. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (2006). Social Intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis. Fourth edition. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relationships. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, B. (1994). Smart girls: A new psychology of girls, women and giftedness. Revised edition. Scottsdale, AZ: Gifted Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubinger, K. D., Rasch, D., & Simeckova, M. (2007).Testing a correlation coefficient's significance: Using H0:0 <p<λ is preferable to H0:p=0.Psychology Science, 49(2),74–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S. (1998). Work left undone. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R., Hubner, J., & Stanton, G. (1996). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegle, D., & Reis, S. (1998). Gender differences in teacher and student perceptions of gifted students’ ability and effort. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42(1), 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (1991). Death, taxes, and bad intelligence tests. Intelligence, 15(3), 257–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirri, K., & Komulainen, E. (2002). Modeling a self-rated intelligence-profile for virtual university. In H. Niemi & P. Ruohotie (Eds.), Theoretical understandings for learning in virtual university (pp. 139–168). Hämeenlinna: RCVE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirri, K., Komulainen, E., Nokelainen, P., & Tirri, H. (2002). Conceptual Modeling of Self-Rated Intelligence Profile. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Self-Concept Research Conference. Sydney: University of Western Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirri, K., Komulainen, E., Nokelainen, P., & Tirri, H. (2003, April). Gardner's Theory Applied to Model a Self-Rated Intelligence Profile. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Multiple Intelligences SIG, Chicago, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirri, K., & Nokelainen, P. (2007, August). Empirical Investigation of the Multiple Intelligences Profiling Questionnaire's Environmental Sensitivity Scale. Paper presented at the 12th biennal conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Budapest, Hungary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirri, K., Nokelainen, P., & Ubani, M. (2006). Conceptual Definition and Empirical Validation of the Spiritual Sensitivity Scale. Journal of Empirical Theology, 19(1), 37–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirri, K., & Ubani, M. (2007). The differences in the intelligence profiles of Finnish 12–13-year old academically gifted girls and boys. In K. Tirri & M. Ubani (Eds.), Holistic education and Giftedness (pp. 8–15). Helsinki: University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, T. L., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrica, 38, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tirri, K., Nokelainen, P. (2011). Multiple Intelligences Profiling Questionnaire. In: Tirri, K., Nokelainen, P. (eds) Measuring Multiple Intelligences and Moral Sensitivities in Education. Moral Development and Citizenship Education, vol 5. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-758-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships