Skip to main content

Phronesis, Experience, and the Primacy of Praxis

  • Chapter
Phronesis as Professional Knowledge

Part of the book series: Professional Practice and Education: A Diversity of Voices ((PPAE,volume 1))

Abstract

There has been a long debate about how research contributes to theoretical knowledge (episteme) about practice and to the development of technique in the professions (poiesis). There has also been debate about how research can contribute to praxis as ‘right conduct’ (on a neo-Aristotelian view of praxis) and as ‘socially responsible, history-making action’ (on a post-Marxian view) in the professions, and also to phronesis, the disposition that Aristotle described as guiding and informing praxis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aristotle. (2003). Ethics. (J. A. K. Thompson, Trans., 1953) (revised with notes and appendices by Hugh Tredennick, 1976; with an introduction by Jonathon Barnes, 1976, 2003; and with a preface by A. C. Grayling, 2003). London: The Folio Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein RJ (1971) Praxis and action: Contemporary philosophies of human activity. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley B (2009) Rethinking "experience" in professional practice: Lessons from clinical psychology. In: Green W (ed) Understanding and researching professional practice. Sense, Rotterdam, pp 65–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne J (1993) Back to the rough ground: "Phronesis" and "techne" in modern philosophy and Aristotle. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraut M (1994) Developing professional knowledge and competence. Falmer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald E (1872) The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. (1983). Reason in the age of science (F. G. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green B (ed) (2009) Understanding and researching professional practice. Sense, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests (Jeremy J. Shapiro, Trans.). Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs J, Titchen A, Neville V (2001) Professional practice and knowledge. In: Higgs J, Titchen A (eds) Practice knowledge and expertise in the health professions. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 3–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindess B (1977) Philosophy and methodology in the social sciences. Harvester Press, Hassocks, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, J. (1998). Ulysses (introduced by J. Johnson). London: Oxford University Press (contains a reprinting of the original 1922 Paris edition published by Shakespeare and Company, available as a Google book from: http://books.google.com/books?id=WVofz29Hx9UC&printsec=frontcover#PRA1-PR73,M1)

  • Kemmis S (2005) Knowing practice: Searching for saliences. Pedagogy, Culture and Society 13(3):391–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. (2008). Practice and practice architectures in mathematics education. In M. Goos, R. Brown, & K. Makar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 17-28). Wahroonga, Australia: MERGA Inc. Available at: http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED503747&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED503747

  • Kemmis, S. (2009). Understanding professional practice: A synoptic framework. Chapter 2 in W. Green (Ed.), Understanding and researching professional practice. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis S (2010) What is professional practice? In: Kanes C (ed) Elaborating professionalism: Studies in practice and theory. Springer, London, pp 130–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis S, Grootenboer P (2008) Situating praxis in practice. In: Kemmis S, Smith TJ (eds) Enabling praxis: Challenges for education. Sense, Rotterdam, pp 37–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & Smith, T. J. (2008). Personal praxis: Learning from experience. Chapter 2 in S. Kemmis & T. J. Smith (Eds.), Enabling praxis: Challenges for education. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre A (1983) After virtue: A study in moral theory. Duckworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid WA (1978) Thinking about the curriculum: The nature and treatment of curriculum problems. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki T (2002) The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University of Pennsylvania Press, University Park, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab JJ (1969) The practical: A language for curriculum. School Review 78:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kemmis, S. (2012). Phronesis, Experience, and the Primacy of Praxis. In: Kinsella, E.A., Pitman, A. (eds) Phronesis as Professional Knowledge. Professional Practice and Education: A Diversity of Voices, vol 1. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-731-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships