Abstract
There has been a long debate about how research contributes to theoretical knowledge (episteme) about practice and to the development of technique in the professions (poiesis). There has also been debate about how research can contribute to praxis as ‘right conduct’ (on a neo-Aristotelian view of praxis) and as ‘socially responsible, history-making action’ (on a post-Marxian view) in the professions, and also to phronesis, the disposition that Aristotle described as guiding and informing praxis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aristotle. (2003). Ethics. (J. A. K. Thompson, Trans., 1953) (revised with notes and appendices by Hugh Tredennick, 1976; with an introduction by Jonathon Barnes, 1976, 2003; and with a preface by A. C. Grayling, 2003). London: The Folio Society.
Bernstein RJ (1971) Praxis and action: Contemporary philosophies of human activity. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia
Bradley B (2009) Rethinking "experience" in professional practice: Lessons from clinical psychology. In: Green W (ed) Understanding and researching professional practice. Sense, Rotterdam, pp 65–82
Dunne J (1993) Back to the rough ground: "Phronesis" and "techne" in modern philosophy and Aristotle. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN
Eraut M (1994) Developing professional knowledge and competence. Falmer, London
Fitzgerald E (1872) The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, London
Gadamer, H. (1983). Reason in the age of science (F. G. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Green B (ed) (2009) Understanding and researching professional practice. Sense, Rotterdam
Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests (Jeremy J. Shapiro, Trans.). Boston: Beacon.
Higgs J, Titchen A, Neville V (2001) Professional practice and knowledge. In: Higgs J, Titchen A (eds) Practice knowledge and expertise in the health professions. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 3–9
Hindess B (1977) Philosophy and methodology in the social sciences. Harvester Press, Hassocks, England
Joyce, J. (1998). Ulysses (introduced by J. Johnson). London: Oxford University Press (contains a reprinting of the original 1922 Paris edition published by Shakespeare and Company, available as a Google book from: http://books.google.com/books?id=WVofz29Hx9UC&printsec=frontcover#PRA1-PR73,M1)
Kemmis S (2005) Knowing practice: Searching for saliences. Pedagogy, Culture and Society 13(3):391–426
Kemmis, S. (2008). Practice and practice architectures in mathematics education. In M. Goos, R. Brown, & K. Makar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 17-28). Wahroonga, Australia: MERGA Inc. Available at: http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED503747&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED503747
Kemmis, S. (2009). Understanding professional practice: A synoptic framework. Chapter 2 in W. Green (Ed.), Understanding and researching professional practice. Rotterdam: Sense.
Kemmis S (2010) What is professional practice? In: Kanes C (ed) Elaborating professionalism: Studies in practice and theory. Springer, London, pp 130–166
Kemmis S, Grootenboer P (2008) Situating praxis in practice. In: Kemmis S, Smith TJ (eds) Enabling praxis: Challenges for education. Sense, Rotterdam, pp 37–64
Kemmis, S., & Smith, T. J. (2008). Personal praxis: Learning from experience. Chapter 2 in S. Kemmis & T. J. Smith (Eds.), Enabling praxis: Challenges for education. Rotterdam: Sense.
MacIntyre A (1983) After virtue: A study in moral theory. Duckworth, London
Reid WA (1978) Thinking about the curriculum: The nature and treatment of curriculum problems. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London
Schatzki T (2002) The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University of Pennsylvania Press, University Park, PA
Schwab JJ (1969) The practical: A language for curriculum. School Review 78:1–24
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kemmis, S. (2012). Phronesis, Experience, and the Primacy of Praxis. In: Kinsella, E.A., Pitman, A. (eds) Phronesis as Professional Knowledge. Professional Practice and Education: A Diversity of Voices, vol 1. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-731-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-731-8_11
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-731-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)