Skip to main content

The Impact of Exhibit-Based Professional Development on Teachers’Pck

  • Chapter
Book cover Understanding Interactions at Science Centers and Museums

Abstract

Many university graduate programs have come to recognize the value of teacher interactions and have systematically planned these networking opportunities in their courses of study. Throughout the United States, and many locations internationally, primary and middle level teachers are being required to pursue discipline specific endorsements for subjects they are assigned to teach exclusively. This chapter will provide a detailed description of a science professional development program that is collaboratively administered by a science centre and a university and targets the learning of subject matter, pedagogy and curriculum within subject specific museum exhibits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Allen, S. (2002). Looking for learning in visitor talk: A methodological exploration. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning Conversations in Museums (pp. 259–303). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R.D. (2007). Inquiry as an organizing theme for science curricula. In S.K. Abell & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 807–830). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D., Kisiel, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2006). Understanding teachers’ perspectives on field trips: Discovering common ground in three countries. Curator: The Museum Journal, 49 (3), 365–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birman, B. F., Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., & Garet, M. S. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 57 (8), 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox-Peterson, A.M., Marsh, D.D., Kisiel, J., & Melber, L.M. (2003). Investigation of guided school tours, student learning, and science reform recommendations at a museum of natural history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (2), 200–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J.H., & Dierking, L.D. (1992). The museum experience. Washington, DC: Whalesback.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J.H., & Dierking, L.D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitors experiences and their making of meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferry, B. (1993). Science centers and outdoor education centers provide valuable experience for preservice teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 4 (3), 85–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferry, B. (1995). Science centers in Australia provide valuable training for preservice teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4 (3), 255–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38 (4), 915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. (1994). Learning to learn in informal settings. Research in Science Education, 24, 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. (1999). An exploration of learning in informal settings. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J., & Symington, D. (1997). Moving from task-oriented to learning-oriented strategies on school excursions to museums. Science Education, 81 (6), 763–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illinois State Board of Education (1997). Illinois learning standards for science. Springfield, IL: Illinois State Board of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2005). Factors influencing elementary school children’s attitudes toward science before, during, and after a visit to the UK national space centre. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42 (1), 53–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hein, G.E. (1998). Learning in the museum. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hein, G.E. (1999). The constructivist museum. In Hooper-Greenhill, E. (Ed.), The Educational Role of the Museum (pp. 73–79). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. (2000). Rethinking the elementary science methods course: A case for content, pedagogy, and informal science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22 (7), 755–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisiel, J. (2005). Understanding elementary teacher motivations for science fieldtrips. Science Education, 89, 936–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, F. (1973). Everyone is you…or me. In M. Quinn (Ed.), Sharing science: Issues in the development of interactive science and technology centres (p. 1). London: Nuffield Foundation in Association with the Committee on the Public Understanding of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orion, N., and Hofstein, A. 1994. Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (8): 1097–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M., Finkelstein, D., & Wever-Frerichs, S. (2007). School site to museum floor: How informal science institutions work with schools. International Journal of Science Education, 29 (12), 1489– 1507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, R.L. (1996). The role of science museums in teacher education. Informal Science Review, 19, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15 (2), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1997). Seeing Tornado: How video traces mediate visitor understandings of (natural?) phenomena in a science museum. Science Education, 81 (6), 735–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storksdieck, M. 2001. Differences in teachers’ and students’ museum field-trip experiences. Visitor Studies Today 4 (1): 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, A. J., Yoon, K. S., Zhu, P., Cronen, S., & Garet, M. S. (2008). Experimenting with teacher professional development: Motives and methods. Educational Researcher, 37 (8), 469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Eva Davidsson Anders Jakobsson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lederman, J.S., Hollyday, G.M., Lederman, N. (2012). The Impact of Exhibit-Based Professional Development on Teachers’Pck. In: Davidsson, E., Jakobsson, A. (eds) Understanding Interactions at Science Centers and Museums. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-725-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships