Abstract
A possible approach in order to explore and increase the understanding of the role of interactions at Science and Technology Centres (STCs) and museums is to focus on and discuss what implications these interactions may have in relation to learning and human development. One explicit aim with such a focus is to take the rich flora of sociocultural or cultural-historical frameworks as a point of departure in order to begin to develop a theoretical model, which aims to describe and explain the significance of interactions in these contexts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
REFERENCES
Allen, S. (2002). Looking for learning in visitor talk: a methodological exploration. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums. (pp. 259–303). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Allen, S., & Gutwill, J. (2004) Designing science museum exhibits with multiple interactive features: Five common pitfalls. Curator, 47 (2), 199–212.
Ash, D. (2004). Reflective scientific sense-making dialogues in two languages: The science in the dialogue and the dialogue in science. Science Education, 88(6), 855–884.
Ash, D. (2004b).How families use questions at dioramas: Ideas for exhibit design. Curator 47(1), 84–100.
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky´s poetics, Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press
Borun, M. (2002).Object-Based Learning and Family Groups.In S. G. Paris (Ed.) Perspectives on Object-Centered Learning in Museums (pp. 245–260). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chiozzi, G., & Andreotti, L. (2001). Behavior vs. time: Understanding how visitors utilize the Milan natural history museum. Curator, 44(2), 153–165.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology. A once and future discipline. Harward: Harward University Press.
Cole, M. & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition, in G. Salomon (Ed). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations 1–46, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Jipson, J. L., Galco, J., Topping, K., & Shrager, J. (2001). Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent–child activity. Science Education 85, 712–732.
Crowley, K. Callanan, M, Terebaum, H., & Allen, E. (2001). Parents explain more often to boys and girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science. 12 (3), 258–261.
Crowley, K. & Jacobs, M. (2002).Building islands of expertice in everyday family activity.In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley & K. Knutson (Eds.) Learning conversations in museums (pp. 333–356). New Jersey, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Daniels, H. (2008). Vygotsky and research. New York: Routledge.
Davidsson, E. (2008). Different images of science – A study of how science is constituted in exhibitions. Phd thesis. Malmö, Sweden: Holmbergs.
Davidsson, E., & Jakobsson, A. (2009). Staff members’ ideas about visitors’ learning at science and technology centres. International Journal of Science Education 31 (1), 129–146.
Davidsson, E & Sørensen. H. (2010). Sponsorship and exhibitions at Nordic science centers and
museums. Museum management and curatorship. 25(4), 345–360.
Dewey, J- (1981). The experimental theory of knowledge. In J. McDermot (Ed). The philosophy of John Dewey. 136–177. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Orginal work 1910)
DeWitt, J., & Osborne, J. (2007). Supporting teachers on science-focused school trips: towards an integrated framework of theory and practice. International Journal of Science Education, 29 (6), 685–710.
Ellenbogen, K., Luke, J., & Dierking, L. (2004).Family learning research in museums: An emerging disciplinary matrix? Science Education, 88 (S1), S48-S58.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y Engeström, R. Miettinen and R-L. Punamäki (Eds). Perspectivies on activity theory.(pp. 19–38).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fors, V. (2006). The missing link in learning in science centres. Luleå, Sweden: Luleå University of Technology.
Griffin, J., Meehan, C. & Jay, D. (2003).The other side of evaluating student learning in museums: Separating the how from what. Paperpresented at the Museum Australia Conference, Perth.
Halliday, M.A.K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold. (Revised by Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen).
Hohenstein, J., & Tran, L. (2007). Use of questions in exhibit labels to generate explanatory conversation among science museum visitors. International Journal of Science Education 29 (12), 1557–1580.
Hutschins, E. (1995). How a cockpit remember its speed. Cognitive science. 19, 265–288.
Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological tools, a sociocultural approach to education. Massachusets, US: Harvard.
Kozulin, A. (2003). Psychological Tools and Mediated Learning. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev & S. Miller. (Eds). Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context. (pp. 15–38). US: Cambridge University Press.
Korn, R., & Jones, J. (2000). Visitor behavior and experiences in the four permanent galleries at the Tech museum of innovation. Curator, 43 (3), 261–281.
Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: the grammar of visual design. London Routledge.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lehn, wom D. (2006). Embodying experience: A video-based examination of visitors’ conduct and interaction in museums. European Journal of Marketing. 40 (11/12), 1340–1359.
Lemke. J. (2004). The literacies of science. In E. Wendy Saul (Ed). Crossing boarders in literacy and science instructions (pp 33–47). VA: NSTA Press.
Leinhardt G, Knutson K (2004) Listening in on museum conversations. AltaMira Press, Lanham
Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality.Engelwood Cliffs, NJ, US: Prentice- Hall.
Lindemann-Matthies, P., & Kamer, T. (2006). The influence of an interactive educational approach on visitors’ learning in a Swiss zoo. Science Education. 90 (2), 296–315.
Linell, P. (2001). Approaching dialogue. Amsterdam: J, Benjamins Pub.
Mäkitalo, Å & Säljö, R. (2002). Talk in institutional context and institutional context in talk: Categories as situated practices. Text 22 (1), 57–82.
Norman, D.A. (1993). Things that make us smart: defending human attributes in the age of the
machine. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Novey, L., & Hall, T. (2007). The effect of audio tours on learning and social interaction: An evaluation at Carlsbad caverns national park. Science Education, 91 (2), 260–277.
Quistgaard, N. (2006). 1.g elever på et science center: Engageres de? – Påvirkes de? [Upper secondary students at a science centre: Are they engaged? Are they influenced?] Ph.D.-dissertation. Denmark, University of Southern Denmark.
Rahm, J. (2004). Multiple modes of meaning-making in a science center. Science Education 88 (2), 223–247.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context New York: US: Oxford University Press.
Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process, in D. Kuhn and R.S. Siegler (Eds) Handbook of ChildPsychology: Vol. 2, Cognition, Perception, and Language, 5 thedn, 679–744, New York; Wiley.
Rogoff, B. (2008). Observing sociocultural activity on three plans; Participatory appropriation, guided participation and apprenticeship. In K. Hall, P Merphy and J. Soler (eds). Pedagogy and practice; Culture and identities. London: Sage Publications Ldt.
Siegel, D. R., Esterly, J., Callanan, M. A., Wright, R., & Navarro. (2007). Conversations about science across activities in Mexican-decent families. International Journal of Science education 29 (12), 1447–1466.
Swanagan, J. S. (2000). Factors influencing zoo visitors’ conservation attitudes and behaviour. The Journal of Environmental Education 31 (4), 26–31.
Shweder, R.A. (1990). Cultural psychology – what is it?, In J, Stigler, R. Shweder and G, Herdt (Eds) Cultural Psychology: Essays on Comparative Human development. 1–43, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Säljö, R. (2005). Lärande och kulturella verktyg: Om lärpocesser och det kollektiva minnet. [Learning and cultural tools: About learning processes and the collective memory] Falun, Sweden: Nordstedts Akademiska Förlag.
Tenenbaum, H., Prior, J., Dowling, C., & Frost, R. (2010). Supporting parent–child conversations in a history museum. British journal on educational psychology. 80, 241–254.
Wartofsky, M. (1979). Models. Representation and the scientific understanding. The Netherlands, Dordrecht: Riedel.
Vygotsky,L.S. (1978). Mind in society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman (Eds and trans), Cambridge, MA: Harward
University Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1981). Instrumental method in psychology.In J. Wertsch (Ed.).The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. (pp. 134–143).NewYork, US: Shape.
Vygotsky,L.S. (1986). Thought and language Cambridge, MA MIT Press. (Orginal, work 1934).
Vygotsky,L.S. (1997). The collected work of L.S Vygotsky. Vol 3: Problems of the theory and history of psychology R. Rieber and Wollock (Eds). New York: Plenum Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J.V. (1991). Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action Cambridge, MA: Harward University Press.
Wertsch, J.V. (1994). The primacy of mediated action in sociocultural studies. Mind, Culture and Activity 1, 4:202–208.
Wertsch, J.V. (1998). Mind as action. New York, US: Oxford University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (2002). Voices of Collective Remembering. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (2007). Mediation. In H. Daniels, M. Coles and J. Wertsch (Eds) The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. US: Canbridge Univesity Press.
Wertsch, J. V. & Stone. C.A. (1985). The concept of internalization in Vygotsky’s account og the genesis of higher mental functions. In J. Wertsch (Ed) Culture, Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectivies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jakobsson, A., Jakobsson, A., Davidsson, E., Davidsson, E. (2012). Using Sociocultural Frameworks to Understand the Significance of Interactions at Science and Technology Centers and Museums. In: Davidsson, E., Jakobsson, A. (eds) Understanding Interactions at Science Centers and Museums. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-725-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-725-7_2
Publisher Name: SensePublishers
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-725-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)