Skip to main content

Using Sociocultural Frameworks to Understand the Significance of Interactions at Science and Technology Centers and Museums

  • Chapter
Book cover Understanding Interactions at Science Centers and Museums

Abstract

A possible approach in order to explore and increase the understanding of the role of interactions at Science and Technology Centres (STCs) and museums is to focus on and discuss what implications these interactions may have in relation to learning and human development. One explicit aim with such a focus is to take the rich flora of sociocultural or cultural-historical frameworks as a point of departure in order to begin to develop a theoretical model, which aims to describe and explain the significance of interactions in these contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Allen, S. (2002). Looking for learning in visitor talk: a methodological exploration. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums. (pp. 259–303). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, S., & Gutwill, J. (2004) Designing science museum exhibits with multiple interactive features: Five common pitfalls. Curator, 47 (2), 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ash, D. (2004). Reflective scientific sense-making dialogues in two languages: The science in the dialogue and the dialogue in science. Science Education, 88(6), 855–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ash, D. (2004b).How families use questions at dioramas: Ideas for exhibit design. Curator 47(1), 84–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky´s poetics, Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Borun, M. (2002).Object-Based Learning and Family Groups.In S. G. Paris (Ed.) Perspectives on Object-Centered Learning in Museums (pp. 245–260). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiozzi, G., & Andreotti, L. (2001). Behavior vs. time: Understanding how visitors utilize the Milan natural history museum. Curator, 44(2), 153–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology. A once and future discipline. Harward: Harward University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition, in G. Salomon (Ed). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations 1–46, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Jipson, J. L., Galco, J., Topping, K., & Shrager, J. (2001). Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent–child activity. Science Education 85, 712–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, K. Callanan, M, Terebaum, H., & Allen, E. (2001). Parents explain more often to boys and girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science. 12 (3), 258–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, K. & Jacobs, M. (2002).Building islands of expertice in everyday family activity.In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley & K. Knutson (Eds.) Learning conversations in museums (pp. 333–356). New Jersey, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, H. (2008). Vygotsky and research. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, E. (2008). Different images of science – A study of how science is constituted in exhibitions. Phd thesis. Malmö, Sweden: Holmbergs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, E., & Jakobsson, A. (2009). Staff members’ ideas about visitors’ learning at science and technology centres. International Journal of Science Education 31 (1), 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, E & Sørensen. H. (2010). Sponsorship and exhibitions at Nordic science centers and

    Google Scholar 

  • museums. Museum management and curatorship. 25(4), 345–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J- (1981). The experimental theory of knowledge. In J. McDermot (Ed). The philosophy of John Dewey. 136–177. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Orginal work 1910)

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt, J., & Osborne, J. (2007). Supporting teachers on science-focused school trips: towards an integrated framework of theory and practice. International Journal of Science Education, 29 (6), 685–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenbogen, K., Luke, J., & Dierking, L. (2004).Family learning research in museums: An emerging disciplinary matrix? Science Education, 88 (S1), S48-S58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y Engeström, R. Miettinen and R-L. Punamäki (Eds). Perspectivies on activity theory.(pp. 19–38).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fors, V. (2006). The missing link in learning in science centres. Luleå, Sweden: Luleå University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J., Meehan, C. & Jay, D. (2003).The other side of evaluating student learning in museums: Separating the how from what. Paperpresented at the Museum Australia Conference, Perth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M.A.K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold. (Revised by Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohenstein, J., & Tran, L. (2007). Use of questions in exhibit labels to generate explanatory conversation among science museum visitors. International Journal of Science Education 29 (12), 1557–1580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutschins, E. (1995). How a cockpit remember its speed. Cognitive science. 19, 265–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological tools, a sociocultural approach to education. Massachusets, US: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozulin, A. (2003). Psychological Tools and Mediated Learning. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev & S. Miller. (Eds). Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context. (pp. 15–38). US: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korn, R., & Jones, J. (2000). Visitor behavior and experiences in the four permanent galleries at the Tech museum of innovation. Curator, 43 (3), 261–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: the grammar of visual design. London Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehn, wom D. (2006). Embodying experience: A video-based examination of visitors’ conduct and interaction in museums. European Journal of Marketing. 40 (11/12), 1340–1359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke. J. (2004). The literacies of science. In E. Wendy Saul (Ed). Crossing boarders in literacy and science instructions (pp 33–47). VA: NSTA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinhardt G, Knutson K (2004) Listening in on museum conversations. AltaMira Press, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality.Engelwood Cliffs, NJ, US: Prentice- Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann-Matthies, P., & Kamer, T. (2006). The influence of an interactive educational approach on visitors’ learning in a Swiss zoo. Science Education. 90 (2), 296–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linell, P. (2001). Approaching dialogue. Amsterdam: J, Benjamins Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäkitalo, Å & Säljö, R. (2002). Talk in institutional context and institutional context in talk: Categories as situated practices. Text 22 (1), 57–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A. (1993). Things that make us smart: defending human attributes in the age of the

    Google Scholar 

  • machine. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novey, L., & Hall, T. (2007). The effect of audio tours on learning and social interaction: An evaluation at Carlsbad caverns national park. Science Education, 91 (2), 260–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quistgaard, N. (2006). 1.g elever på et science center: Engageres de? – Påvirkes de? [Upper secondary students at a science centre: Are they engaged? Are they influenced?] Ph.D.-dissertation. Denmark, University of Southern Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahm, J. (2004). Multiple modes of meaning-making in a science center. Science Education 88 (2), 223–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context New York: US: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process, in D. Kuhn and R.S. Siegler (Eds) Handbook of ChildPsychology: Vol. 2, Cognition, Perception, and Language, 5 thedn, 679–744, New York; Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (2008). Observing sociocultural activity on three plans; Participatory appropriation, guided participation and apprenticeship. In K. Hall, P Merphy and J. Soler (eds). Pedagogy and practice; Culture and identities. London: Sage Publications Ldt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. R., Esterly, J., Callanan, M. A., Wright, R., & Navarro. (2007). Conversations about science across activities in Mexican-decent families. International Journal of Science education 29 (12), 1447–1466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanagan, J. S. (2000). Factors influencing zoo visitors’ conservation attitudes and behaviour. The Journal of Environmental Education 31 (4), 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, R.A. (1990). Cultural psychology – what is it?, In J, Stigler, R. Shweder and G, Herdt (Eds) Cultural Psychology: Essays on Comparative Human development. 1–43, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Säljö, R. (2005). Lärande och kulturella verktyg: Om lärpocesser och det kollektiva minnet. [Learning and cultural tools: About learning processes and the collective memory] Falun, Sweden: Nordstedts Akademiska Förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenenbaum, H., Prior, J., Dowling, C., & Frost, R. (2010). Supporting parent–child conversations in a history museum. British journal on educational psychology. 80, 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wartofsky, M. (1979). Models. Representation and the scientific understanding. The Netherlands, Dordrecht: Riedel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky,L.S. (1978). Mind in society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman (Eds and trans), Cambridge, MA: Harward

    Google Scholar 

  • University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1981). Instrumental method in psychology.In J. Wertsch (Ed.).The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. (pp. 134–143).NewYork, US: Shape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky,L.S. (1986). Thought and language Cambridge, MA MIT Press. (Orginal, work 1934).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky,L.S. (1997). The collected work of L.S Vygotsky. Vol 3: Problems of the theory and history of psychology R. Rieber and Wollock (Eds). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J.V. (1991). Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action Cambridge, MA: Harward University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J.V. (1994). The primacy of mediated action in sociocultural studies. Mind, Culture and Activity 1, 4:202–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J.V. (1998). Mind as action. New York, US: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (2002). Voices of Collective Remembering. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (2007). Mediation. In H. Daniels, M. Coles and J. Wertsch (Eds) The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky. US: Canbridge Univesity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. & Stone. C.A. (1985). The concept of internalization in Vygotsky’s account og the genesis of higher mental functions. In J. Wertsch (Ed) Culture, Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectivies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Eva Davidsson Anders Jakobsson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jakobsson, A., Jakobsson, A., Davidsson, E., Davidsson, E. (2012). Using Sociocultural Frameworks to Understand the Significance of Interactions at Science and Technology Centers and Museums. In: Davidsson, E., Jakobsson, A. (eds) Understanding Interactions at Science Centers and Museums. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-725-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships