Advertisement

Concept Learning in Professional Development

  • Marja-Ilona Koski
  • Marc J. de Vries
Part of the International Technology Education Studies book series (ITES, volume 9)

Abstract

In this chapter an exploratory, qualitative study into primary school teachers’ preconceptions in science and technology is presented. The purpose of this study was to get a first impression of the effect professional development activities in the VTBPro project had on primary teachers’ knowledge of concepts. Learning concepts is one of the aims of the professional development programs, next to attitude development and the development of pedagogical skills in teaching science and technology. To be able to assess the effects of these programs, it is necessary to know the ideas with which the teachers enter the program, also in terms of their scientific and technological preconceptions.

Keywords

Professional Development Conceptual Change System Thinking Professional Development Program Primary Teacher 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Appleton, K. (2003). How Do Beginning Primary School Teachers Cope with Science? Toward an Understanding of Science Teaching Practice. Research in Science Education 33(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bencze, J. (2001). 'Technoscience' Education: Empowering Citizens Against the Tyranny of School Science. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 11(3), 273–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davis, R., S., Ginns, I., S. and McRobbie, C., J. (2002). Elementary School Students' Understandings of Technology Concepts. Journal of Technology Education 14(1), 35–50.Google Scholar
  4. Hand, B. & Treagust, D. (1988). Application of a conceptual conflict teaching strategy to enhance student learning of acids and bases. Research in Science Education 18(1), 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harlen, W. & Holroyd, C. (1997). Primary teachers’ understanding of concepts of science: impact on confidence and teaching. International Journal of Science Education 19(1), 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hestenes, D., Wells, M. & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. Physics Teacher 30(3), 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jarvis, T. & Pell, A. (2004). Primary teachers’ changing attitudes and cognition during a two-year science in-service programme and their effect on pupils. International Journal of Science Education 26(14). 1787–1811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Knowles, M. (1980). The Modern Practice of Adult Education, from Pedagogy to Andragogy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall..Google Scholar
  9. Kruger, C., J., Summers, M., K. & Palacio, D., J. (1990). An Investigation of Some English Primary School Teachers’ Understanding of the Concepts Force and Gravity. British Educational Research Journal 16(4), 383–397.Google Scholar
  10. Lewis, T. (1999). Research in Technology Education--Some Areas of Need. Journal of Technology Education 10(2), 41–56.Google Scholar
  11. Loverude, M., E., Kautz, C., H. & Heron P., R., L. (2003). Helping students develop an understanding of Archimedes' principle. I. Research on student understanding. American Journal of Physics 71(11), 1178–1187.Google Scholar
  12. Posner, G., J., Strike, K., A., Hewson, P., W. & Gertzog, W., A. (1982). Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change. Science Education 66(2), 211–227.Google Scholar
  13. Rollnick, M. & Rutherford, M. (1990). African primary school teachers-what ideas do they hold on air and air pressure? International Journal of Science Education 12(1), 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. She, H.,-C. (2002). Concepts of a higher hierarchical level require more dual situated learning events for conceptual change: a study of air pressure and buoyancy. International Journal of Science Education 24(9), 981–996.Google Scholar
  15. Taylor, A., R., Jones, M., G., Broadwell, B. & Oppewal, T. (2008). Creativity, inquiry, or accountability? Scientists' and teachers' perceptions of science education. Science Education 92(6), 1058–1075.Google Scholar
  16. Vosniadou, S. & Ioannides, C. (1998). From conceptual development to science education: a psychological point of view. International Journal of Science Education 20(10), 1213–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Yin, Y., Tomita, M., K. & Shavelson R. (2008). Diagnosing and Dealing with Student Misconceptions: Floating and Sinking. Science Scope 31(8), 34–39.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marja-Ilona Koski
  • Marc J. de Vries
    • 1
  1. 1.Delft University of TechnologyThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations