Advertisement

Introduction to the Theme

  • Wynne Harlen
  • Pierre Léna
Part of the International Technology Education Studies book series (ITES, volume 9)

Abstract

There is concern in many countries of the world and throughout Europe that there is a decline in young people’s interest in studying science, technology and mathematics (European Commission 2007, OECD 2008a). The blame for this state of affairs is laid mainly at the door of teaching methods which have presented science as being a matter of facts and theories that seem to have little relevance to students’ everyday lives. It is not surprising that alternative areas of study, in the arts and humanities for instance, appear more attractive to students living in a fastmoving, media-rich world.

Keywords

Professional Development Primary School Science Education Small Idea Primary Child 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberts, B. (2009). Refining science education, Science, 323, 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allende, J. (2008). Academies active in education, Science, 321, 1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Artigue, M. (2010). Les défis de l’enseignement des mathématiques dans l’éducation de base (2010), UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  4. Berthélémy, J-C. (2007). Globalization and challenges for education in least developed countries. In Malinvaud, E., Léna, P., Sanchez Sorondo, M. (Eds) (2007) Globalisation and Education, Pontifical Academies of Sciences & of Social Sciences, Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  5. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning, Assessment in Education 5(1): 7–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bransford, J., Brown, A. & Cocking, R. (Eds) How People Learn. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  7. Centre Jean Lagarde (2006). Expérimentation sur la démarche d’investigation, DVD, CNDP-Scéren, Paris.Google Scholar
  8. Charpak, G., Léna, P. & Quéré, Y. (2005). L’enfant et la Science, O. Jacob.Google Scholar
  9. Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Hertz-Pannier, L., Dubois, J., & Dehaene, S. (2008). How does early brain organization promote language acquisition in humans? European Review, 16(4), 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Driver, R. (1983). The pupil as scientist? Milton Keynes: Open University PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Driver, R. (1973). The representation of conceptual frameworks in young adolescent science students. PhD thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinios.Google Scholar
  12. Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H.A. Shouse, A.W. (Eds) (2007). Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8 Washington DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  13. European Commission (2007). Science Education Now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe, (The Rocard report), Brussels: EC.Google Scholar
  14. Fleer, M. (2007). Young children: Thinking about the scientific world. Watson, ACT; Early Childhood Australia.Google Scholar
  15. Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A. N. & Kuhl, P.K. (1999). The Scientist in the Crib. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
  16. Goshwami, U. & Bryant, P. (2007). Children’s Cognitive Development and Learning. (Primary Review Research Survey 2/1a), Cambridge: University of Cambridge Faculty of Education.Google Scholar
  17. Guesne, E. (1978). Lumière et vision des objets: un example de représentation des phénomènes physiques pré-existant à l’enseignement. In G. Delacôte (Ed) Physics teaching in schools, London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  18. Guichard, F. (2007). Comment devient-on scientifique? Enquête sur la naissance d’une vocation, Paris: EDP Sciences.Google Scholar
  19. Harlen, W. & Holroyd, C. (1997). Primary teachers' understanding of concepts in science: impact on confidence and teaching. International Journal of Science Education 19(1) 93-105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harlen, W. & Allende, J. (Eds) (2009). Teacher Professional Development in Pre-Secondary School Inquiry-Based Science Education (IBSE), InterAcademyPanel Report,http://www.iap.org
  21. Harlen, W. & Allende, J. (Eds) (2006). International Colaboration in the Evaluation of Inquiry-Based Science Education (IBSE), InterAcademyPanel Report,http://www.iap.org
  22. Haworth, C., Dale, P. & Plomin, R. (2008). A twin study into the genetic and environmental influences on academic performance in science in nine-year-old boys and girls, International Journal of Science Education, 30(8): 1003-1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Howard-Jones, P., Pollard, A., Blakemore, S-J., Rogers, P. Goshwami, U., Butterworth, B., Taylor, E., Williamon, A., Morton, J. & Kaufmann, L. (2007). Neuroscience and Education: Issues and Opportunities, London: TLRP/ESRC.Google Scholar
  24. James, M. & Pedder, D. (2006). Professional learning as a condition for assessment for learning, in J. Gardner (ed) Assessment and Learning. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. La main à la pâte (2010).http://www.lamap.fr
  26. Léna, P. (2009). Europe rethinks education, Science, 324, 501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin, A (2010). Building Classroom Success: Eliminating Academic Fear and Failure. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  28. Michaels, S., Shouse, A. and Schweingruber, H. (2008) Ready, Set, Science Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science classrooms. Washington DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  29. Murphy, C., Neil, P. and Beggs, J. (2007). Primary science teacher confidence revisited: ten years on, Educational Research, 49 (4): 415-430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. National Science Foundation (NSF) (1997). The Challenge and Promise of K-8 Science Education Reform. Foundations 1. Arlington:VA: NSF.Google Scholar
  31. National Science Foundation (NSF) (1999). Inquiry Foundations 2. Arlington: VA: NSF.Google Scholar
  32. OECD (2003) The Pisa 2003 Assessment Framework Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  33. OECD/CERI (2005). Students with Disabilities. Difficulties and disadvantages: Statistics and Indicators, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  34. OECD/CERI (2007). Understanding the Brain: the Birth of a Learning Science. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  35. OECD (2008a). Encouraging Student Interest in science and technology Studies, Global Science Forum, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  36. OECD (2008b). Policies and Practices Supporting the Educational Achievement and Social Integration of First and Second generation Migrants: A systemic Review. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  37. OECD (2008c). Trends Shaping Education, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  38. Ormerod, M.B. & Duckworth, D. (1975). Pupils’ Attitudes to Science, Windsor: NFER.Google Scholar
  39. Osborne, R.J & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in Science: the Implications of ‘Children’s Science’, Auckland: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  40. Peer Learning Activity Report (2006). Schools as learning communities for their teachershttp://www.cilo.europeesplatform.nl/files/habermehl_teachers.doc
  41. Pollen project (2009). Seed Cities for Science.http://www.pollen-europa.net
  42. Royal Society (2006). Taking a leading role. London: The Royal Society.Google Scholar
  43. Royal Society (2010). Science and mathematics education 5–14. London: The Royal Society.Google Scholar
  44. Russell, T., Black, P., Harlen, W., Johnson, S. & Palacio, D. (1988). Science at Age 11. A review of APU Survey Findings 1980–84. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  45. Saltiel, E. and Duclaux, M. (2010). submitted.Google Scholar
  46. Sarmant, J.-P., Saltiel, E. Léna, P. (2010). La main à la pâte. Implementing a plan for science education reform in France, in G.E. de Boer (Ed) The role of public policy in K-12 science education Charlotte, USA: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  47. SPACE (Science Processes and Concepts Exploration) Research Reports. Evaporation and Condensation (1990), Growth (1990), Light (1990), Sound (1990), Electricity (1991), Materials (1991), Processes of Life (1992), Earth in Space (1992) Rocks, Soil and Weather (1992), Forces 1998). Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Tiberghien, A., and Delacôte, G. (1978). Conception de la chaleur chez les enfants de 1 à 12 ans. In G. Delacote (Ed) Physics teaching in schools, London: Taylor and Francis, 275–82.Google Scholar
  49. Wei Yu (2010) Key Laboratory of Child Development and Learning Science, http://rcls.seu.edu.cn/en/rd_1.html
  50. Zull, J.E. (2004). The art of changing the brain. Educational Leadership 62(1): 68–72.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wynne Harlen
    • 1
  • Pierre Léna
    • 2
  1. 1.University of BristolUK
  2. 2.Université Paris DiderotFrance

Personalised recommendations