Skip to main content

Reflections From A ‘Dutch’ Perspective

  • Chapter
A Practicum Turn in Teacher Education

Part of the book series: Pedagogy, Education and Praxis ((PEDA,volume 6))

Abstract

A ‘practicum turn’ is a well-known phenomenon in my Dutch context. In the Netherlands this turn is formulated in the new concept of werkplekleren (‘workplace learning’), indicating that preservice teachers learn at and from the workplace. This concept replaces earlier concepts like stage (apprenticeship), hospitium (apprenticeship, but with some connotation towards hospitality, the trainee being a guest in the school) and simply praktijk (practice, indicating the importance of action). At present werkplekleren is considered a means to bridge the long-standing gap between theory and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ball, S. (1991). Case Study Methodology in Research on Mother Tongue Education: Theorising the Object. In Haueis, E. & W. Herrlitz (Eds.) (1991), Comparative studies in European Standard Language Teaching. Methodological problems of an interpretative approach. Studies in Mother Tongue Education 5, Enschede: VALO-M.p. 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodin, H. (2011). Exploring the Self as Part of Practice. Reflections on students´ practical learning from the social work perspective.In M. Mattsson.T.V. Eilertsen & D. Rorrison, (Eds.), A Practicum Turn in Teacher Education. This edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderhead, J. (2001), International Experiences of Teaching Reform. In V. Richardson (Ed) (2001), Handbook of Research on Teaching (4th ed.). Washington DC: American Educational Research Association, 777–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W. &Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: education, knowledge and action research. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collès, L., Dufays, J.L., Maeder, C. (2003). Enseigner le français, l’espangol et l’italien. Les langues romanes à l’heure des competences. Bruxxelles: De Boeck Duculot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilertsen, T.V., Furu, E.M. & Rørnes, K (2011). Learning beyond the Traditional: Preservice Teachers as Partners in School development. In M. Mattsson, T.V Eilertsen, & D. Rorrison, (Eds.),A Practicum Turn in Teacher Education. This edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emsheimer, P. & Ljunggren de Silva, N. (2011).Preservice Teachers´ Reflections on Practice in relation to Theories. In M. Mattsson, T.V. Eilertsen & D. Rorrison, (Eds.), A Practicum Turn in Teacher Education. This edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englund, T. (1996). The public and the text. Journal of Curriculum Studies 28(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fried, R (1995). The Passionate Teacher: A Practical Guide. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. (1999). Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. (2007). How Do I Apply This To My Classroom, Relating Theory to Practice? In Gordon & O’Brian (Eds.), Bridging Theory and Practice in Teacher Education. Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and Human Interests. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedegaard-Sørensen, L. & Tetler, S. (2011). Situated Professionalism in Special Education Practice. In M. Mattsson, T.V. Eilertsen & D. Rorrison, (Eds.), A Practicum Turn in Teacher Education.This edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkinen, H., Tynjälä, P. & Kiviniemi, U. (2011). Integrative Pedagogy in Practicum. Meeting the Second Order Paradox of Teacher education. In M. Mattsson, T.V. Eilertsen & D. Rorrison, (Eds.), A Practicum Turn in Teacher Education. This edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrlitz, W. & Van de Ven, P.H. (2007). Comparative research on mother tongue education In: Herrlitz, W., Ongstad, S. & Van de Ven, P.H. (Eds.), (2007). Research on mother tongue/L1-education in a comparative perspective: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi, p. 13–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. (1974), Knowledge and the curriculum, a collection of philosophical papers.London: Toutledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultman, G. (1987), Kan skolan styras med forskning och utvärdering? [Can the school be steered by research and evaluation?] Forskning om Utbildning 14(2), 28–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jönsson, A. & Mattsson, M. (2011). Assessing Teacher Competency during Practicum. In M. Mattsson, T.V. Eilertsen & D. Rorrison, (Eds.), A Practicum Turn in Teacher Education. This edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F. (2001). Linking practice and theory: the pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Mahwah N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F. & Wubbels, T. (1998). Wat is een reflectieve leraar? Naar een betekenisvolle invulling van het begrip reflectie. [What is a reflective teacher? Towards a meaningful conception of reflection]. Velon Tijdschrift voor lerarenopleiders 19(4), 6–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (1985), Linguistic processes in sociocultural practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvernbekk, T. (2001). Erfaring, praksis og teori i Pedagogikk og laererprofesjonalitet. Kvernbekk, T. ed. Gyldendal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Männikkö-Barbutiu, S. & Rorrison, D. (2011). Memorable Encounters. In M. Mattsson, T.V. Eilertsen & D. Rorrison, (Eds.), A Practicum Turn in Teacher Education. This edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansvelder-Longayroux, D. (2006). The learning portfolio as a tool for stimulating reflection by teachers. Leiden: ICLON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthijssen, M. (1982), De elite en de mythe. Een sociologische analyse van strijd om onderwijsverandering. [The elite and the myth. A sociological analysis of the battle on educational change].Deventer: Van Loghum Slaterus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattsson, M, Eilertsen, T. V. & Rorrison, D. (2011). What is Practice in Teacher Education? In M. Mattsson, T.V. Eilertsen & D. Rorrison, (Eds.), A Practicum Turn in Teacher Education. This edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miedema, S. (1986). Kennen en handelen. Bijdragen aan het theorie-praktijk-debat in de opvoedingswetenschap. [Knowing and acting. Contributions to the theory-practice debate in pedagogical sciences]. Leuven/Amersfoort: ACCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ongstad, S. (1997), Sjanger, posisjonering og oppgaveideologier. En teortisk-empirisk bidrag til et tverrfaglig, semiotisk og didaktisk sjangerbegrepp. [Genres, positionings and tasks´ ideologies. A theoretical and empirical contribution to a interdisciplinary, semiotic and didactic conception of ‘genre’]. Trondheim: NTNU (Diss. NTNU)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr, G. (2010). Inquiry-based Professional Learning: Speaking Back to Standard-based Reforms. Teneriffe Qld:Post Pressed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauw, I. (2007). De kunst van het navelstaren. De didactische implicaties van de retorisering van refelctieverslagen op de pabo. [The art of navel gazing. The didactic implications of rhetorising reflection accounts at teacher training institutes for primary education]. s Zwolle: KPZ in druk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, L. (1991). Practical Wisdom and the Geography of Knowledge in Composition. College English 53(8), 863–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remington Smith, E. (2007). Integrating theory and practice in an English methods course. Developing a Teaching Stance, in Gordon & O’Brian (ed). Bridging Theory and Practice in teacher education. Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorrison, D. (2011). Border Crossing in Practicum Research. In M. Mattsson, T.V. Eilertsen & D. Rorrison, (Eds.), A Practicum Turn in Teacher Education. This edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of Pragmatism. Brighton: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, W. & van de Ven, P.H. (2007). Starting points: paradigms in mother tongue education. In: L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature 7(1), 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholes, R. (1989). The Rise and Fall of English: reconstructing English as a Discipline. New Haven/Conn.: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D.A. (1983/2000). The Reflective Practitioner; How professionals think in action. Aldershot; Arena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, D. (2003). Language and thought online: cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In: D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge MA: MIT press. 157–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snoek, M. (2011). Teacher education in The Netherlands: Balancing between Autonomous Institutions and a Steering Government. In M. Valenčič Zuljan & J. Viogrinc (Eds.). European Dimensions of Teacher Education – Similarities and Differences. Ljubljana: faculty of Education; Kranj: The National School of Leadership and Education. P. 53–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thavenius, J. (1981), Modersmål och fadersarv.Svenskämnets traditioner i historien och nuet. [Mother tongue and fatherly heritage. Traditions of the school subject Swedish in present and past]. Stockholm: Symposion Bokförlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Leeuw, B. (2006). Schrijftaken in de lerarenopleiding. Een etnografie van onderwijsvernieuwing. [Writing assignments in teacher education. An ethnography of educational innovation]. Heeswijk-Dinther: Esstede.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, P.H. (2001). Curriculum as D/discourse – an exploration from the perspective of teachers´ learning. In G. Khruslov & S. Kroon (Eds.).Languages of family and school.Institute for Problems of Education, Moskou, 2001, 120–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, P.H. (2009). Leren van registreren. Verslag van een in-companytraject voor opleiders in de school. [Learning from registrering. Report on an in-company trajectory for mentors in school]. In Th. Bergen e.a. (Red.). Perspectieven op samen leraren opleiden. Antwerpen/Apeldoorn: Garant, p. 71–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, P.H., Martens, J. & Imants, J. (2005).Praktijkgericht onderzoek bij de ontwikkeling van actief en zelfstandig leren binnen het schoolvak Nederlands. [Practice related research during the development of active and autonomous learning in the school subject Dutch]Pedagogische Studiën 82(4), 293–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, P.H. & Oolbekkink, H. (2008). Pragmatic and politically neutral: The Image of the Academic Secondary School Teacher in the Discourse of Teacher Education. In: Ax, J. & Ponte, P. (Eds.). Critiquing Praxis: Conceptual and Empirical Trends in the Teaching Profession. Rotterdam, Taipei: Sense, 21–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Veen, K. & Van de Ven, P.H. (2008).Integrating Theory and Practice.Learning to teach L1 language and literature. L1 – Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 8(4), 39–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K. & Tabachnich, B. (1991). Reflections on Reflective Teaching. In B. Tabachnich & K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner (Eds.) (1991). Issues and Practices in Inquiry-Oriented Teacher Education. London: The Falmer Press, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ven, PH.v.d. (2011). Reflections From A ‘Dutch’ Perspective. In: Mattsson, M., Eilertsen, T.V., Rorrison, D. (eds) A Practicum Turn in Teacher Education. Pedagogy, Education and Praxis, vol 6. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-711-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships