Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Technology Education Studies ((ITES,volume 8))

Abstract

I have always been suspicious of the agendas that accompany a proposed link between technology and other curriculum areas. When Science and Technology as a subject is offered in primary schools, science is prioritized and consequently technology is not delivered well (Williams, 2001). This is a function of both inadequate primary school facilities and deficient primary teacher training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Barlex, D. (2008). STEM: Can we still be cheerful? D&T News (38). Warwickshire, UK: The Design and Technology Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board of Studies. (2009). Engineering studies, Stage 6. Sydney: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge Engineering Design Centre. (2009). Improving the design process. Retrieved on July 7, 2009 from http://www-edc.eng.cam.ac.uk/

  • Cross, N. (2000). Engineering design methods. Chichester, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Council. (2001). Our youth, our future. Perth: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Council. (2008). Engineering studies. Perth: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing, B.M., & Daugherty, M.K. (2004). Delivering engineering content in technology education. The Technology Teacher, 64(3), 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J., Iversen, E., & Kalyandurg, C. (2004). Engineering in the K-12 classroom: An analysis of current practices and guidelines for the future. Washington: ASEE Engineering K12 Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugger, W. (1988). Technology – the discipline. The Technology Teacher, 48(1), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggert, R. (2005). Engineering design. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gattie, D., & Wicklein, R. (2007). Curricular value and instructional needs for infusing engineering design into K-12 technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 19(1), 6–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Technology Education Association. (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimbell, R., & Perry, D. (1991). Design and technology in a knowledge economy. Goldsmiths University of London: Technology Education research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaPorte, J., and Sanders, M. (1993). The T/S/M integration project: Integrating technology, science, and mathematics in the middle school. The Technology Teacher, 52(6), 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. (2005). Coming to terms with engineering design as content. Journal of Technology Education, 16(2), 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpas, R. (2000). The universe of engineering. London: The Royal Academy of Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCade, J. (2006). Is design a right-brain or left-brain activity? Journal of Technology Education, 17(2), 72–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petroski, H. (1996). Invention by design. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petroski, H. (1998). Polishing the gem: A first-year design project. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 445–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primary Engineer. (2009). Retrieved on July 9, 2009 from http://www.primaryengineer.com/

  • Project Lead The Way. (2005). Curriculum Philosophy. Retrieved on July 6, 2009 from http://www.pltw.org

  • Queensland Studies Authority. (2004). Engineering Technology. Brisbane: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, G. (2005). Pre-engineering’s place in technology education and its effect on technological literacy as perceived by technology education teachers. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 41(3), 6–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, G. (2006). The effectiveness of project lead the way curricula in developing pre-engineering competencies as perceived by Indiana teachers. Journal of Technology Education, 18(1), 66–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, D. (2003). The mechanical design process (3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicklein, R.C. (2006). 5 Good reasons for engineering design as the focus for technology education. The Technology Teacher, 65(7), 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P.J., & Williams, A. (Eds.) (1996). Technology education for teachers. Melbourne: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P.J. (2001). The Teaching and Learning of Technology in Australian Primary and Secondary Schools. Department of Education, Science and Technology Working Report, Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, P.J., Williams, P.J. (2011). Engineering. In: Vries, M.J.d. (eds) Positioning Technology Education in the Curriculum. International Technology Education Studies, vol 8. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-675-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships