Abstract
The social multiaccentuality of the ideological sign is a very crucial aspect. By and large, it is thanks to this intersecting of accents that a sign maintains its vitality and dynamism and the capacity for further development. A sign that has been withdrawn from the pressures of the social struggle – which, so to speak, crosses beyond the pale of the class struggle – inevitably loses force, degenerating into allegory and becoming the object not of live social intelligibility but of philological comprehension.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
REFERENCES
Ashton, P., & Simons, M. (Eds.). (1979). Our lives: Young people’s autobiographies. London: ILEA English Centre.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Barthes, R. (1977). Image music text. London: Fontana.
Barton, J. (1984). Playing Shakespeare. London: Methuen.
Britzman, D. P. (2003). Practice makes practice a critical study of learning to teach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. New York & London: RoutledgeFalmer.
DfEE (Department for Education and Employment). (2001). Key stage 3 national strategy: Framework for teaching English: Years 7, 8 and 9. London: DfEE.
Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Jones, K. (2003). Education in Britain: 1944 to the present. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Miller, S. M. (2003). How literature discussion shapes thinking: ZPDs for teaching/learning habits of the heart and mind. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. Ageyev, & S. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 289–316.
Moger, R. & Richmond, J. (Eds.). (1985). Say what you think: Argument and discussion writing by London school students. London: ILEA English Centre.
Moll, L. C. (2000). Inspired by Vygotsky: Ethnographic experiments in education. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research (pp. 256–268). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Naidoo, B. (1985). Journey to Jo’burg: A South African story. London: Longman.
QCDA [Qualifications and Curriculum Development Authority]. (2009). National curriculum. Retrieved January 6, 2010, from http://www.curriculum.qcda.gov.uk/key-stages-3–and-4/subjects/key-stage-4/english/programme-of-study/index.aspx?tab=1
Said, E. W. (1984). The World, the text, and the critic. London: Faber and Faber.
Searle, C. (Ed.). (1971). Stepney words. London: Reality Press (reprinted 1973, by Centerprise Press).
Simons, M., Raleigh, M., & Ashton, P. (Eds.). (1982). City lines: Poems by London school students. London: ILEA English Centre.
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the Subaltern speak?. In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Urbana, IL, & Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Thompson, P. (2008). Learning through extended talk. Language and Education, 22(3), 241–256.
Turvey, A. (1992). Interrupting the lecture: Cox seen from a classroom. In K. Jones (Ed.), English and the national curriculum: Cox’s revolution? (pp. 32–61). London: Kogan Page.
Volosinov, V. N. (1929/1986). Marxism and the philosophy of language. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Problems of general psychology, including the volume thinking and speech. New York & London: Plenum.
Wesker, A., & Thacker, D. (1994, April 13). The trial of Shylock. Guardian.Williams, R. (1958). Culture is ordinary. In N. MacKenzie (Ed.), Conviction (pp. 74–92). London: MacGibbon & Kee.
Yandell, J. (1997). “Sir Oracle”: The merchant of Venice in the classroom. Changing English, 4(1), 105–122.
Yandell, J. (2008a). Embodied readings: Exploring the multimodal social semiotic resources of the English classroom. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 7(1), 36–56.
Yandell, J. (2008b). Exploring multicultural literature: The text, the classroom and the world outside. Changing English, 15(1), 25–40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Turvey, A., Yandell, J. (2011). Difference in the Classroom. In: Ven, PH.v.d., Doecke, B. (eds) Literary Praxis. Pedagogy, Education and Praxis, vol 5. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-586-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-586-4_10
Publisher Name: SensePublishers
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-586-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)
