Skip to main content

Gaming to Learn

A Promising Approach Using Educational Games to Stimulate STEM Learning

  • Chapter
Fostering Human Development Through Engineering and Technology Education

Part of the book series: International Technology Education Studies ((ITES,volume 6))

Abstract

This chapter addresses how playing and developing educational games are instructional strategies that could add immeasurably to the contribution ETE programs make to contemporary STEM education. The introduction to this chapter presents a rationale for game-based learning that addresses the changing perceptions and capabilities of youth in the present era and provides research-based support for the high-interest learning that gaming has the potential to promote. The promise of playing and designing/developing thoughtfully conceived games is described in terms of increasing student engagement, promoting inquiry-based learning, the effect on self-efficacy, attitudes toward further ETE study and stimulating interest in related STEM careers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Adams, E., & Rollings, A. (2007). Fundamentals of game design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, J. (2004, March 7–18). Open modules: A proposal for modular reasoning in aspect-oriented programming. In C. Clifton, R. L¨ammel, & G. T. Leavens (Eds.), Proceedings of the Foundations of Aspect-Oriented Languages Workshop at AOSD. Available at http://www.eecs.ucf.edu/FOAL/papers-2004/aldrich.pdf

  • Barab, S., Hay, K., & Hickey, D. (Eds.). (2006). Proceedings of the seventh International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS). Bloomington, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartle, R. (1996). Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs. Journal of Virtual Environments, 11(1). Available athttp://www.brandeis.edu/pubs/jove/HTML/v1/bartle.html

  • Bayliss, J., & In Microsoft PressPass – Information for Journalists. (2008). More than fun and games: New computer science courses attract students with educational games. Available athttp://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2005/sep05/09-12CSGames.mspx

  • Blikstein, P., & Wilenski, U. (2006). ‘Hybrid modeling’: Advanced scientific investigations linking realworld sensing and multi-agent computer-based models. In S. Barab, K. Hay, & D. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) (pp. 890–891). Bloomington, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • E-Line Media, & Institute of Play. (2010). Gamestar Mechanic Software. Available athttp://www.gamestarmechanic.com

  • El-Nasr, M. S., & Smith, B. K. (2006). Learning through game modding. Computers in Entertainment, 4(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entertainment Software Association. (2009). Essential facts about the computer and video game industry. Available at http://www.theesa.com/facts/pdfs/ESA_EF_2009.pdf

  • Federation of American Scientists (FAS). (2010). Immune Attack Software. Available athttp://www.immuneattack.org

  • Hacker, M., & Crismond, D. (2008). Virtual vs. physical modeling. Hempstead, NY: Hofstra University Center for Technological Literacy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, M. (2009, March 26–28). A transformative model for technology education. Paper presented at the International Technology Education Association (ITEA) conference, Louisville, KY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, M. (2008). Survey of technology education state supervisors. Hempstead, NY: Hofstra University Center for Technological Literacy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, M. (2010). Informed design. Hempstead, NY: Hofstra University Center for Technological Literacy. Retrieved June 11, 2010, fromhttp://www.hofstra.edu/pdf/Academics/Colleges/SOEAHS/ctl/ctl_informeddesign_003.pdf

  • I Support Learning, Inc. Curriculum at-a-glance: Web game design. Retrieved June 1, 2010, fromhttp://www.isupportlearning.com/PDF/Web.pdf

  • Junco, R., & Mastrodicasa, J. (2007). Connecting to the Net.Generation: What higher educationprofessionals need to know about today’s students. Washington, DC: NASPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kebritchi, M., Hirumi, A., & Bai, H. (2010). The effects of modern mathematics computer games on mathematics achievement and class motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 427–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiggens, J. (2009). Report on Defoe’s. A journal of the plague year. Unpublished report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, E., & Johnson, K. (2000). Land of plenty: Diversity as America’s competitive edge in science, engineering and technology (NSF 02–107). Washington, DC: Congressional Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science, Engineering and Technology Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Microsoft PressPass – Information for Journalists. (2008). More than fun and games: New computer science courses attract students with educational games. Available athttp://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2005/sep05/09-12CSGames.mspx

  • Lenhart, A., Kahne, J., Middaugh, E., Macgill, A., Evans, C., & Vitak, J. (2008). Teens, video games and civics. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Available athttp://www.pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2008/PIP_Teens_Games_and_Civics_Report_FINAL.pdf

  • Moskal, B., Lurie, D., & Cooper, S. (2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of a new instructional approach. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 36(1), 75–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (NSF). (2003). New formulas for America’s workforce: Girls in science and engineering. Arlington, VA. Available athttp://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2003/nsf03207/nsf03207_1.pdf

  • Powers, W. T. (1973). Behavior: The control of perception. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Survival Master game. Available athttp://www.gaming2learn.org

  • Sawyer, B., & Smith, P. (2008). Serious games taxonomy. San Francisco: Game Developer’s Conference, Serious Games Summit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starkweather, K. (2007). Letter of support. Simulations and modeling for technology education. A proposal to the US National Science Foundation (NSF).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarbrough, C., & Fleischman, J. (2009). ‘Shoot-em up’ video game increases teenagers’ science knowledge. EurekAlert. Available athttp://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-12/asfc-v112609.php

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hacker, M., Kiggens, J. (2011). Gaming to Learn. In: Barak, M., Hacker, M. (eds) Fostering Human Development Through Engineering and Technology Education. International Technology Education Studies, vol 6. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-549-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships