Abstract
This paper opens with a critique of the majoritarian, post-Enlightenment, scientific worldview, the assumptions it makes about human cosmologies and lifestyles and how, in turn, these assumptions influence the nature of educational systems. The critique focuses on how the experiences of minority cultures, particularly those cultures that are nomadic or pastoralist, challenge some of the fundamental premises of majoritarian education. There follows a cultural ecological framing which compares the ways in which western (majoritarian) cultures and minoritarian cultures contextualise education. In western educational situations, structures, contexts and schemata are substantially pre-defined, and we talk about things as ‘context-dependent’, since context is something that can be described as the backdrop to behaviour. In minoritarian cultures both meaning and context emerge from people’s interactions with their environments and may subsequently be described. These are respectively relational and co-constitutional manifestations of situations. The manifestations are different, not oppositional or mutually exclusive. We present an ecological framework in an attempt to simultaneously embrace both interpretations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Referencess
Atleo, R. (2004). Tsawalk – a Nuu-chah-nulth Worldview. Vancouver: UBC press.
Bayliss, P. (2009). Mongolian Education in a time of change: cosmologies, history and cultural formations. Paper submitted to Journal of Mongol Studies (under review)
Benham, M.K.P., & Heck, R.H. (1998). Culture and Educational Policy in Hawai’i. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Carnoy, M. (1999). Globalization and educational reform: what planners need to know. Paris: UNESCO/IIEP.
Damasio, A. (2000). The Feeling of What Happens: body, emotion and the making of consciousness. London: Vintage.
Dillon, P. (2008a). A pedagogy of connection and boundary crossings. Methodological and epistemological transactions in working across and between disciplines. Innovations in Teaching and Education International, 45(3), 255–262.
Dillon, P. (2008b). Creativity, wisdom and trusteeship – niches of cultural production. In A. Craft, H. Gardner & G. Claxton (Eds), Creativity and Wisdom in Education (pp. 105–118). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Dillon, P., Bayliss, P., Stolpe, I., & Bayliss, L.(2009). What constitutes ‘context’ in sociocultural research. How the Mongolian experience challenges theory. Transtext(e)s Transcultures, 3, forthcoming.
Edelman, G.M., & Tononi, G. (2000). Consciousness. How matter becomes imagination. London: Penguin.
Dyer, C. (2001). Nomads and Education For All: education and development or dometsication? Comparative Education, 37(3), 315–327.
Foucault, M. (1971). Discipline and Punish. London: Harmondsworth.
Humphrey, C., & Urgunge, O. (1996). Shamans and Elders. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University press.
Jones, P. (1998). Globalisation and Internationalism: democratic prospects for world education. Comparative education, 34(2), 143–155.
Khazanov, A. M. (1994). Nomads and the Outside World. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Kratli, S. (2000). The bias behind nomadic education. UNESCO Courier. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1310/is_2000_Oct/ai_66495261/pg_2/?tag=artBody;col1.Downloaded.15thMarch.2009.
Kratli, S. (2001a). Educating Nomadic Herders Out of Poverty? Culture, education and pastoral livelihood in Turkana and Karamoja. Washington, DC.: World Bank.
Kratli, S. (2001b). Education provision to nomadis pastoralists: a literature review. IDS Working Paper 126. Washington. DC.: World Bank
Latour, B. (1991). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Levitt, H. (1999). The development of wisdom an analysis of Tibetan Buddhist experience. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 39(2), 86–105.
McGuinness, C. (2005). Behind the acquisition metaphor: conceptions of learning and learning outcomes in TLRP school-based projects. Curriculum Journal, 16(1), 31–47.
Meyer, W. (1996). Towards a global culture: Human Rights, group rights and cultural relativism. International Journal on Group Rights, 3, 169–195.
Ong, W. (1982). Orality and Literacy. London: Routledge.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(1), 4–13.
Steiner-Khamsi, G., & Stolpe. I. (2004). Decentralization and recentrailzation reform in Mongolia: tacing the swing of the pendulum. Compariative Education, 40(1), 29–53.
Stolpe, I. (2008). Schule versus Nomadismus? Interdependenzen von Bildung und Migration in der modernen Mongolei. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
UNESCO, (2009). Education for All. Downloaded at: http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.php-URL_ID=47077&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html.(April,2009)
WECFA, (1990). World declaration on Education For All and Framework for action to meet basic learning needs. New York: WECFA
World Bank, (1995). Policies and strategies for Education: a World Bank Review. Washington. DC.: World Bank.
Ze, D (1995). Walter Ong’s paradigm and Chinese literacy. Canadian Journal of Communication, 20(4), 1–16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bayliss, P., Dillon, P. (2011). Cosmologies And Lifestyles: A Cultural Ecological Framework and its Implications for Education Systems. In: Lauriala, A., Rajala, R., Ruokamo, H., Ylitapio-Mäntylä, O. (eds) Navigating in Educational Contexts. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-522-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-522-2_13
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-522-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)