Abstract
The role of school psychologists in Western Australia has been reviewed a number of times since the establishment of services to schools. Current practice whereby school psychologist allocation to a range of schools is achieved, continues to rely on school student population figures, its socioeconomic index and an appraisal of the school’s ‘difficulty’ level. Psychological services are then allocated accordingly, the decision-making mechanism based on an ad hoc conception of school need. The research reported in this paper concentrates on the issue of trying to establish what aspects or characteristics of learning environments constitute a greater or esser level of need for services and then attempts to measure this need in an objective evidence-based manner. The various elements of school need for psychological services are posited to cluster around constructs extrapolated from the domains of service reported in the international professional literature. These are characteristics of students, characteristics of schools and teacher expertise. The three constructs constitute the preliminary conceptual framework for the study upon which the empirical investigation was based. The study was conducted in three phases: First, item development, theoretical framework refinement utilising data collected from a questionnaire; second, development of a pool of appropriate items, piloting and trialling; and third, utilising the refined linear scale to measure a sample of schools need for psychological services. Data were obtained from samples of principals, teachers and school psychologists working in two Department of Education and Training (DET) school districts. Data analysis employed the Rasch Rating Scale Model and Analyses of Variance. Data fitting the model confirmed that a uni-dimensional trait was measured. Data-to-model fit was estimated by item difficulty thresholds, individual item fit statistics, the person Separation Index and Principal Components Factors loadings of residuals. The results demonstrated that the linear scale instrument developed in the research provided an authentic measure of school need and that the measures of the phase three schools differed significantly from each other. The empirical findings of the study are discussed in the context of their application in informing decisions about the level of psychological services that should be provided to schools congruent with the psychological needs of their students.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alaie, A. (2008). High-Achieving post baccalaureate-student teaching assistants: Effective instruction in introductory laboratory classrooms. Journal of College Science Teaching, 37(4), 60–64.
Bedford, D., Jackson, C. R., & Wilson, E. (2008). New partnerships for learning: Teachers’ perspectives on their developing professional relationships with teaching assistants in England. Journal of In-service Education, 34(1), 7–25.
Blatchford, P., Russell, A., Bassett, P., Brown, P., & Martin, C. (2007). The role and effects of teaching assistants in English Primary Schools (Years 4 to 6) 2000–2003. Results from the Class Size and Pupil-Adult Ratios (CSPAR) KS2 Project. British Educational Research Journal, 33(1), 5–26.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Downer, A. C. (2007). The national literacy strategy sight recognition programme implemented by teaching assistants: A precision teaching approach. Educational Psychology in Practice, 23(2), 129–143.
Linacre, J. M. (2004). Optimising rating scale category effectiveness. In E. V. Smith & R. M. Smith (Eds.), Introduction to Rasch measurement: Theory, models and application (pp. 258–278). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.
Minondo, S., Meyer, L. H., & Xin, J. F. (2001). The role and responsibilities of teaching assistants in inclusive education: What's appropriate? Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps (JASH), 26(2), 114–119.
Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2003). Student background and teacher effects on achievement and attainment in mathematics: A longitudinal study. Educational Research and Evaluation, 9(3), 289–314.
O’Neal, C., Wright, M., Cook, C., Perorazio, T., & Purkiss, J. (2007). The impact of teaching assistants on student retention in the sciences: Lessons for TA training. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(5), 24–29.
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedagogiske Institut.
Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (Expanded ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rasch, G. (1993). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (Reprint ed.). Chicago: MESA Press.
Savage, R., & Carless, S. (2008). The impact of early reading interventions delivered by classroom assistants on attainment at the end of year 2. British Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 363–385.
Wilson, E., & Bedford, D. (2008). “New partnerships for learning”: Teachers and teaching assistants working together in Schools–The way forward. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 34(2), 137–150.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Young, A., Cavanagh, R.F. (2011). An Investigation of Differential Need for Psychological Services Across Learning Environments. In: Cavanagh, R.F., Waugh, R.F. (eds) Applications of Rasch Measurement in Learning Environments Research. Advances in Learning Environments Research, vol 2. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-493-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-493-5_10
Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-493-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)