Skip to main content

Understanding the Complexity of Technology Acceptance by Higher Education Students

  • Chapter
Technology Acceptance in Education

Abstract

It is often claimed that all young people are highly adept with the digital technologies that infuse their lives, and that the way they think and behave has created a new gap between them and their teachers. It is suggested that to bridge this gap and ensure that young people are fully engaged, educators must incorporate digital technology more effectively into teaching and learning. This is problematic, however, because technology has had limited impact on education and has failed to be widely adopted as a learning support across many aspects of school and university education. More needs to be known about how technology is seen by young people and their teachers in order to understand the true nature of the problem that has been identified. This chapter will report on recent research investigating the reasons why digital technologies are adopted by university students in their everyday and academic lives. The findings provide insights into how the ‘rules of the game’ in different contexts influence the ways in which individuals perceive the utility of a technology and the ways in which they use it. This research draws on sociological concepts as an orienting theoretical framework to investigate and conceptualise these differences and consider what they mean for the integration of digital technologies in education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Barnes, K., Marateo, R., & Pixy Ferris, S. (2007). Teaching and learning with the Net Generation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innovate, 3(4). Retrieved September 5, 2009, from http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=382&action=article

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, S. (2007). Places to go: Google’s search results for the “Net Generation”. Innovate, 3(4). Retrieved June 27, 2007, from http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=455

  • Jones, C., Ferreday, D., & Hidgson, V. (2008). Networked learning a relational approach: Weak and strong ties. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Ramanaua, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G. (in press). Net generation or digital natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers and Education. (Accepted 15 September 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Gray, K., Waycott, J., Judd, T., et al. (2009). Educating the Net Generation - A handbook of findings for practice and policy. Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Retrieved October 19, 2009, from http://www.altc.edu.au/system/files/resources/CG6-25_Melbourne_Kennedy_Handbook_July09.pdf

  • Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Gray, K., Judd, T., Waycott, J., Bennett, S., et al. (2007). The Net Generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: Preliminary findings from a large crossinstitutional

    Google Scholar 

  • study. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, S. K. A. Soong, & C. Cheers (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th annual conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 517–525). Singapore: ascilite.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., & Christie, P. (2003). Leading theory: Bourdieu and the field of educational leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 6(4), 317–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzo, G., Oblinger, D., & Dziuban, C. (2007). How choice, co-creation, and culture are changing what it means to be net savvy. Educause Quarterly, 30(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. (2008). Habitus. In M. Grenfell (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts (pp. 49–65). London: Acumen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prenksy, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salaway, G., & Caruso, J. (2007). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and technology. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52, 302–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toledo, C. (2007). Digital culture: Immigrants and tourists responding to the natives’ drumbeat. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(1), 84–92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maton, S.B.K., Carrington, L. (2011). Understanding the Complexity of Technology Acceptance by Higher Education Students. In: Teo, T. (eds) Technology Acceptance in Education. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-487-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships