The Impact of Visual Design Quality on Game-Based Learning

  • Nicola Whitton
  • Peter Whitton
Part of the Contemporary Approaches to Research in Learning Innovations book series (CARL, volume 5)

Abstract

Computer games have the potential to provide an engaging and pedagogically-sound alternative to traditional teaching (e.g. Connolly et al, 2007; Ebner & Holzinger, 2007; Akkerman et al, 2009). They can support exploration, interaction and providean immersive experience in which learners can collaborate with others to solve problems and learn from their mistakes. However, a major limitation on their use is the ability for educators to obtain or create games that meet the desired learning outcomes for a particular context and are appropriate for their learners. Commercialoff-the-shelf (COTS) games have the advantage of being professionally produced but are designed primarily for entertainment – so even if an appropriate game can be found there are still the challenges of steep learning curves, time-consuming play, and expense to overcome before they could be deployed in an educational context. Designing games from scratch requires expertise in game design, graphics and programming and, while games produced in this way may meet their educational objectives, the limited time, know-how and budgets available mean that the look-andfeel of the game is less likely to be professionally executed than a commercial game.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akkerman, S. Admiraal, W., & Huizenga, J. (2009). Storification in history education: A mobile game in and about medieval Amsterdam. Computers & Education, 52(2), 449–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, E. (2009). Fundamentals of game design. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.Google Scholar
  3. Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bellotti, F., Berta, R., De gloria, A., & Primavera, L. (2009). Enhancing the educational value of video games. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 7(2).Google Scholar
  5. Benyon, D., Turner, P., & Turner, S. (2005). Designing interactive systems. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  6. Bloch, P. (1995). Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. The Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buckingham, D., & Scanlon, M. (2003). Interactivity and pedagogy in ‘Edu-tainment’ software. Information technology, Education and Society, 4(2), 107–126.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, C. C., & Lyons, C. (2004). Graphics for learning: proven guidelines for planning, designing and evaluating visuals in training materials. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
  9. Connolly, T. M., Stansfield, M., & Hainey, T. (2007). An application of games-based learning within software engineering. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 416–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crossly, R. (2010). Study: Average dev costs as high as $28m. Retreived April 12, 2010, from http://www.develop-online.net/news/33625/Study-Average-dev-cost-as-high-as-28m
  11. Dormans, J. (2008, July 22–27). Beyond iconic simulation. In Proceedings of gaming 2008: Designing for engaging experience and social interaction. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  12. Ebner, M., & Holzinger. A. (2007). Successful implementation of user-centered game based learning in higher education: An example from civil engineering. Computers & Education, 49(3), 873–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Egenfeldt Nielsen, S., Heide Smith, J., & Pajares Tosca, S. (2008). Understanding video games: The essential introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Hayward, D. (2005). Videogame aesthetics: The future! Gamasutra. Retrieved April 12, 2010, from www.gamasutra.com/features/20051014/hayward_01.shtml
  15. Kirsh, D. (2005). Metacognition, distributed cognition and visual design. In P. Gardenfors & P. Johansson, Eds.), Cognition, education, and communication technology (pp. 147–180). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Korhonen, H., & Koivisto, E. M. I. (2006). Playability heuristics for mobile games. In Proceedings of the 8th conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services. New York: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series.Google Scholar
  17. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, Learning and Instruction: III. Conative and affective process analyses. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Miller, D. J., & Robertson, D. P. (2010). Using a games console in the primary classroom: Effects of ‘Brain Training’ programme on computation and self-esteem. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 242–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moseley, A., Whitton, N., Culver, J., & Piatt, K. (2009, October 12–13). Motivation in alternate reality gaming environments and implications for education. In Proceedings of the 3rd European conference on game-based learning. Graz.Google Scholar
  21. Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Nielsen, J. (2003). Usability Website. Retrieved January 9, 2010, from http://www.useit.com/
  23. Oxland, K. (2004). Gameplay and design. Harlow: Addision Wesley.Google Scholar
  24. Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Hayward, E. O. (2009). Design factors for educationally effective animations and simulations. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21(1), 31–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ruecker, S., Sinclair, S., & Radzikowska, M. (2007). Confidence, visual research, and the aesthetic function. Partnership: the Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 2(1).Google Scholar
  26. Ringuette-Angrignon, P. (2009). Why “Next-Gen Games” went Gray, Brown, And Grey. Retreived April 10, 2010, from http://www.gamasutra.com/blogs/PhilippeRinguetteAngrignon/20090606/1708/Why_quotNextGen_Gamesquot_Went_Gray_Brown_And_Grey.php[Retrieved April 1, 2010].
  27. Robins, D., & Holmes, J. (2008). Aesthetics and credibility in web site design. Information Processing and Management, 44(1), 386–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sánchez, J. L. G., Zea, N. P., & Gutiérrez, F. L. (2009). From usability to playability: Introduction to player-centred video game development process. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on human centered design. San Diego, CA: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Schell, J. (2008). The art of game design: a book of lenses. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufman.Google Scholar
  30. Shedroff, N. (2001). Experience design. Thousand Oaks, CA: New Riders Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. Taylor, M. J., & Baskett, M. (2009). The science and art of computer games development for undergraduate students. Computers in Entertainment, 7(2).Google Scholar
  32. Thompson, J., Berbank-Green, B., & Cusworth, N. (2007). The computer game design course: Principles, practices and techniques for the aspiring game designer. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  33. Vanderdonckt, J. (2003). Visual design methods in interactive applications. In M. Albers & B. Mazur (Eds.), Content and complexity: Information design in technical communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  34. Virvou, M., & Katsionis, G. (2008). On the usability and likeability of virtual reality games for education: The case of VR-ENGAGE. Computers & Education, 50(1), 154–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Whitton, N. (2007). An investigation into the potential of collaborative computer game-based learning in higher education. Retrieved on April 14, from http://playthinklearn.net/?page_id=8
  36. Whitton, N. (2010). Learning with digital games. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sense Publishers 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicola Whitton
    • 1
  • Peter Whitton
    • 2
  1. 1.Manchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK
  2. 2.University of SalfordSalfordUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations